ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Clark is on 610 right now (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268760)

The Franchise 01-11-2013 12:38 PM

There is no scenario where not taking a QB at #1 would be justifiable.

If you stick with the 3-4.....you've got Hali and Houston....no Jarvis Jones. Poe is your NT....no Star. ILBs and CBs don't go #1 overall.

If you re-sign Albert.....no OT. If you don't re-sign Albert...you drafted Donald Stephenson last year.....****ing play him.

Coogs 01-11-2013 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 9305712)
I still think the Chiefs take a QB with the #1 pick despite Clark's comments.

They absolutely have to. There is no other option. It's clearly the most glaring weakness and need on the team. There is no better way to improve the position than the draft.

He is just stating that there is no blue chip for sure prospect thats a guarantee to pick at #1 for QB. Doesn't mean the Chiefs won't draft a QB though. Nothing to fret over really.

Absolutely! To pass on a QB in round 1, and have one of the 1st rounders pan out to be a franchise QB... :shake:

If we take a QB in the first, and he turns out to be a bust... :shrug:

Draft another one.

The Bad Guy 01-11-2013 12:51 PM

To me with Andy Reid right now, I think Barkley is going to be the target.

Mr. Kotter 01-11-2013 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 9305800)
Absolutely! To pass on a QB in round 1, and have one of the 1st rounders pan out to be a franchise QB... :shake:

If we take a QB in the first, and he turns out to be a bust... :shrug:

Draft another one.

Exactly. I agree, but the whole value-thing seems to weigh very heavily in the discussion when it comes time to actually pick--because the BAA argument really is compelling given draft history.

However, if they are able to trade down 5-6 spots without jeopardizing choosing one of the three top prospects...I could see them doing that. On the other hand if they are not going to be availble, if there was ever a year Chief's fans will forgive the FO on a "reach" for a QB--this would be it. Either way...our first round pick will most likely be a QB.

Unless they are dead certain that "their" guy will be there when we pick in the second... :spock:

:(

Rausch 01-11-2013 12:53 PM

Clark has never taken a QB in the 1st and he won't this year either.

Too risky...

Mr. Kotter 01-11-2013 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9305828)
Clark has never taken a QB in the 1st and he won't this year either.

Too risky...

Like I said, if there were ever a year he could get away with it....this would be it...:hmmm:

htismaqe 01-11-2013 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9305792)
lol... in ANY round? ROFL

Adjust your sarcasm meter...

ChiefsCountry 01-11-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9305823)
To me with Andy Reid right now, I think Barkley is going to be the target.

PBJ

Rausch 01-11-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 9305834)
Like I said, if there were ever a year he could get away with it....this would be it...:hmmm:

And he still won't...

htismaqe 01-11-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9305828)
Clark has never taken a QB in the 1st and he won't this year either.

Too risky...

Clark is on a whirlwind tour to win back the fans.

I think they take a QB because it gives him something singular to galvanize the fanbase.

Don't think he didn't notice that there were more Joe Montana and Trent Green (and even ELVIS GRBAC) jerseys in the stadium vs. Matt Cassel jerseys.

The Franchise 01-11-2013 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9305840)
PBJ

Honest question...

In what ways is Barkley better than Smith?

Rausch 01-11-2013 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9305823)
To me with Andy Reid right now, I think Barkley is going to be the target.

:spock:








:#












http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-conte...ulking-out.gif

Mr. Kotter 01-11-2013 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9305844)
Clark is on a whirlwind tour to win back the fans.

I think they take a QB because it gives him something singular to galvanize the fanbase.

Don't think he didn't notice that there were more Joe Montana and Trent Green (and even ELVIS GRBAC) jerseys in the stadium vs. Matt Cassel jerseys.

Eh, I think Rausch is just preparing himself for a letdown...that or trying the reverse psychology angle. Heh.

BigMeatballDave 01-11-2013 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9305852)
Honest question...

In what ways is Barkley better than Smith?

I'm not high on Barkley, but considering the offense Reid likes to run, Barkley isn't a bad idea.

I'd still rather have Smith.

I'd be good with Smith, Wilson, or Barkley. In that order.

dirk digler 01-11-2013 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 9305800)
Absolutely! To pass on a QB in round 1, and have one of the 1st rounders pan out to be a franchise QB... :shake:

If we take a QB in the first, and he turns out to be a bust... :shrug:

Draft another one.

Yep. With the way the contracts are setup now for 1st round draft choices it makes no sense to trade back or not pick a QB if you were the Chiefs.

Of course unless they get a king's ransom in return.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.