IMO, if you can hit solidly on 30% of picks, your outstanding.

Yeah the OP is pretty funny...

"Drafts aren't that impressive...hit, hit, hit, hit, bust, hit, hit, hit, hit"

ROFL

According to the OP he hit on 80% of his 1st round picks.

Reid probably should have picked a big ugly instead of McNabb. Thankfully for Reid he ignored the criticisms and took the QB. Paid off for him.

He's not stupid. He'll pick the QB

Funny how when you hit on drafting your QB, drafting becomes alot easier.

Since Montana was under center he has 15 playoff wins and we have zip.

Did you even read...or look at the history. 1 stud from your first round picks in 14 years is not very good. Yes his first round picks have produced some NFL starting caliber players more than not, but they are AVERAGE, AVERAGE at best.

If you look at all the picks it even gets worse.

Which one would he pick, anyway. It's not like Joe Thomas or Ndomukong Suh are anywhere in this draft. The linemen are no more top heavy than the QBs are.

That's not even taking some of his second rounders into account like Jackson and McCoy

The thing you are missing, is that the position they were drafting, isn't a spot where you are gonna get top notch studs for the most part. There will be from time to time, but outside say the top 10 give or take, you're looking for solid players with ability to get better and become something.

LMAO

Does he realize where he was picked?

So the draft is only one round now?

14 years and 1 stud?

That's ****ing lunacy.

How has he done in other rounds? Off the top of my head, DeSean Jackson was 2nd rounder and Westbrook was 3rd rounder?

Ive stated this alot: Not every 1st rounder is going to be a stud or a HoFer. But if you get a solid contributor for several years, its still a good pick.

"By far the cream of the crop."

LMAO. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!/Eagles fans.

Ummm I acknowledged this fact. You should still have better quality than this. Compare it to the Patriots 1st rounders. Patriots >>>>>>> Eagles