Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cassel can restructure to show Foles the ropes.
|
Quote:
Of course, teams don't do what the Skins did last year either. So maybe we're looking at the start of a new trend... |
Quote:
|
unfortunately, I've been indoctrinated/conditioned to believe no matter what the Chiefs decided to do...
I'll be wrong. |
I'd swap 1st and 2nd round picks and give up our 3rd for Foles...
|
Quote:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rdAv2t0oJx...ious_meme.jpeg |
Quote:
They dedicated a reasonable FA contract and a 3rd round pick to the position - that's it. And who the hell would complain about that? That's not what some folks are suggesting. They're suggesting using 2 of our first 3 picks on the position. No, the Seahawks would've never done that. And frankly, the Seahawks are an outlier. If you're going to cite them as your model, then I guess we need to draft a bunch of 3rd and 4th round QBs, right? They got lucky. |
The 49ers traded a 2nd and a 4th for Steve Young back in the day.
I don't agree that if we give up a 3rd round pick he's automatically our starter. That high 2nd, maybe. But not the third. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because we have an extra 3rd, we could walk away from the draft with: 1.1 QB 2.2 WR 3.1 Nick Foles 3.whatever SS etc. And like you pointed out, teams have been able to find quality starters at the safety position deeper in the draft, so there is still a very good chance you could find a quality player with 3.-whatever it's going to be. |
Quote:
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4949/matt-flynn |
Quote:
I like signing a vet FA, AND drafting the best QB available, and if the damned world league wouldn't have gone tits up I'd look there as well. The Niners didn't quit looking for QB's because they had Montana. Packers kept drafting and adding guys behind good QB's. You should be looking to improve your starter or depth every single year at that position... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.