ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Would you support drafting McClain? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=226739)

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-19-2010 11:50 AM

Would you support drafting McClain?
 
If the Chiefs pass on Berry and Clausen, do you find that selection defensible if the Chiefs draft McClain at #5, or trade down to #7 to make that pick, perhaps acquiring a third in the process?

Reaper16 04-19-2010 11:51 AM

No. I don't hate McClain, I like some aspects of his game actually, but I don't want to spend a top 10 pick on him.

ChiefsCountry 04-19-2010 11:51 AM

I like McClain alot but man its tough passing on Berry or Clausen.

The Franchise 04-19-2010 11:51 AM

I would rather them ****ing take Dan Williams instead of McClain.

cabletech94 04-19-2010 11:51 AM

If it make the team better, yea.

The Bad Guy 04-19-2010 11:52 AM

Nope.

If you aren't going to take Aaron Curry at 3 in a shallow draft, you can't take McClain at 5 in a tremendously deep one.

talastan 04-19-2010 11:52 AM

Trade down would be preferable, I'd be dissapointed if we got him at #5, but not angry. Anything but a d@mn linemen IMO.

Rain Man 04-19-2010 11:53 AM

I've got nothing against McClain and think he'll likely be a fine player, but not at the #5 or #7.

The Bad Guy 04-19-2010 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6686076)
I would rather them ****ing take Dan Williams instead of McClain.

There is no scenario where I want Dan Williams on this team.

Monte Kiffin said he needed to be motivated highly to get him to the level he got to last year. What's left to motivate him when he gets 25 million guaranteed.

He's one guy I stay far far away from in this draft.

ChiefsCountry 04-19-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6686080)
Nope.

If you aren't going to take Aaron Curry at 3 in a shallow draft, you can't take McClain at 5 in a tremendously deep one.

McClain is a much better player than Aaron Curry. Curry was just a physical freak. But we could have had a MLB if they didn't make that silly trade last year.

Reaper16 04-19-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6686076)
I would rather them ****ing take Dan Williams instead of McClain.

Hell, I'd rather them take Terrance Cody (which isn't to say that I want them to).

Mr. Flopnuts 04-19-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6686076)
I would rather them ****ing take Dan Williams instead of McClain.

This. And I don't want shit to do with Williams. Now, if we traded down to the teens and picked up a 2nd or more, then I would be okay with it if he was BPA.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-19-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6686080)
Nope.

If you aren't going to take Aaron Curry at 3 in a shallow draft, you can't take McClain at 5 in a tremendously deep one.

That's about the best way one could put it.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-19-2010 11:56 AM

I'm just trying to get a gauge on the pulse of the board. If this happens (somewhat unlikely, but who the **** really knows?) it will be interesting to see how many do an about face.

Huffman83 04-19-2010 11:57 AM

I'd hope for further down in the draft and more/ higher picks. But overall..yeah.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.