If *YOU* were a first round draft pick...
Would you want to be one of the first 5 picks for the money but you play for a terrible team... or would you rather be a 30-32nd pick and get less money but play for a Super Bowl contending team?
Personally, I would much rather be a late 1st rounder and play for a team that is going to be a contender. As long as I play well, I am still going to get paid on my next contract... assuming I don't get hurt. |
I would choose the latter as well. Of course there's always the chance you could be Brady Quinned and get nabbed by a sucky team trading up, getting less pay and being on a bad team. So it might be best to go for the money.
|
interesting pov but i think the higher you go the better off you are
|
Quote:
I think you just coined a new CP draft term. LMFAO |
Quote:
|
I would rather be in the top 4 and get the money. If you are good the team will get better. If you suck you still have the cash.
|
There's too much parity to guarantee success, so along with the challenge of being part of a rebuilding process, I'd take the money to be on a bad team.... outside of the Lions and Raiders.
|
I'd choose Top 5. Get the money, and be a catalyst for change. Plus, it probably means I am super-talented, and could be one of the keys to turning things around and establishing myself as an NFL legend.
|
The chance of going to last years superbowl teams
and going back to the SB is not good if not the Patriots bottom dwelers have a better chance if not Lions or Cards |
Gimme the $ and I'll take my chances... look at teams like OAK in their last SB appearance. What happened the next year? Steelers? Nothing is a sure thing.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.