Warfield inactive for the Redskin game
 

Per 610 sports. They are on a rampage about how Willie Roaf, coming off of an injury, is ready to play while the Chiefs are holding an opinion that Warfield isn't ready to step on the field. This is complete garbage. Vinny Testaverde, who is 42 and out of football, can come in on one week of preparation, and lead his team to a win. But Warfield, who has had the opportunity to be at Arrowhead and be at all of the defensive/position meetings, isn't ready to go.

I'm not sure who to be pissed at here. Is it Vermeil taking a stance ala Joe Gibbs with Lavar Arrington, or did Warfield turn into a couch potato with his month away?

Complete bullshit.

I think this is great.

We'll get to blame to loss on McCleon for at least one more week...

I sure hope that is a "RhondaMossspilledsome chilidog sauce on her editorial" error.

That is UNACCEPTABLE.

You've got to be kidding me. This is ludicrous.

You've got to be fucking kidding me.

It is Dick being a dick

Vermeil has lost it. May the football gods have mercy on us all.

I for one, unlike anyone else posting here, am outraged.

Isn't it a bit early to be announcing inactives for the game? :hmmm:

If the Redskins put 300 yards up on our D through the air this weekend, DV should be run out of town.

:sulk:

I think there will be a big enough CP contigency to do it too.

I'm hoping that this is one of Vermeils' alpha-dog I'll-show-you lessons. Hopefully somebody out there will snap him back to his senses before the inactives are OFFICIALLY announced on gameday.

Insanity! I want back all of the draft picks we surrendered for Vermeil.