ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Positives so far this season? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264954)

Hammock Parties 10-10-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8999780)
He'd be third string?...

He'd be #2 corner. Like Routt.

Right now he's playing #1 corner.

He's only given up six catches.

Rausch 10-10-2012 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999839)
He'd be #2 corner. Like Routt.

Right now he's playing #1 corner.

He's only given up six catches.

We have a left and right CB.

No 1st or 2nd...

SAUTO 10-10-2012 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999839)
He'd be #2 corner. Like Routt.

Right now he's playing #1 corner.

He's only given up six catches.

why not just say where he's rated?

This is the type of thing that makes you look petty and childish
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 10-10-2012 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 8999806)
Charles is back.
Cassel's moat has been breached.
Bowe keeps getting better.
That other guy has a few catches this year.
Winston is better than Richardson.
Houston is half man, half monster.
I think the Powe-Poe platter has shown promise.

I'd love to see Poe move to DE and keep Powe at NT...

Hammock Parties 10-10-2012 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8999847)
why not just say where he's rated?

This is the type of thing that makes you look petty and childish
Posted via Mobile Device

I already told you he was rated higher than Routt.

Is that not good enough for you?

He's 48th, Routt is 65th.

Carr > Routt.

durtyrute 10-10-2012 06:55 PM

Cassel is on the bench.

SAUTO 10-10-2012 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999857)
I already told you he was rated higher than Routt.

Is that not good enough for you?

He's 48th, Routt is 65th.

Carr > Routt.

I agree carr is better than routt.

Always thought so.
Just making an observation
Posted via Mobile Device

Ceej 10-10-2012 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999837)
FACTS:

Routt sucks.

Carr is playing better.

Carr would be playing better than Routt in KC because he'd be a #2.

You suck.

So does Scott Pioli.

No, you suck!

Neener, neener.

MeatRock 10-10-2012 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999839)
He'd be #2 corner. Like Routt.

Right now he's playing #1 corner.

He's only given up six catches.

LMAO To say that Routt is garbage because of 2 illegal contact penalties against Torrey Smith is laughable. Torrey ****ing Smith is more of a #1 receiver than Anquan ****ing Boldin, whom Flowers was covering most of the day.

I'm not sold on Routt as being better than Carr, but he has held his own against good receivers that are #1's in my book. The Atlanta game is a wash as both receivers are #1's and could eat up Carr in any game.

BTW **** Carr in his cowboy ass. He can lick my taint.

-King- 10-10-2012 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999857)
I already told you he was rated higher than Routt.

Is that not good enough for you?

He's 48th, Routt is 65th.

Carr > Routt.

LMAO Looks like they both suck. And if they both suck, I'll take the one that doesn't cost 50MM.

Hammock Parties 10-10-2012 07:09 PM

Routt is garbage.

Carr was better in this system.

Don't care what he's doing somewhere else.

His numbers are also slightly skewed right now because he had one awful game.

-King- 10-10-2012 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999911)
Routt is garbage.

Carr was better in this system.

Don't care what he's doing somewhere else.

His numbers are also slightly skewed right now because he had one awful game.

Routts numbers are skewed also by his worst game.

MeatRock 10-10-2012 07:13 PM

48th - 65th? Who has Carr covered that's a better receiver than Torrey Smith or Julio Jones?

Hammock Parties 10-10-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8999912)
Routts numbers are skewed also by his worst game.

You know I'm right.

And because Carr is MUCH better than Routt, at the end of the season there's going to be a huge gap between them.

Guessing Routt stays put, Carr will be top 20.

Suck it, Pioli.

-King- 10-10-2012 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8999926)
You know I'm right.

And because Carr is MUCH better than Routt, at the end of the season there's going to be a huge gap between them.

Guessing Routt stays put, Carr will be top 20.

Suck it, Pioli.

LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.