ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   New Wizard of OZ trailer is out (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261358)

Bambi 07-12-2012 08:23 PM

New Wizard of OZ trailer is out
 
hahaha....lets go!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yyywumlnhdw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

QuikSsurfer 07-12-2012 08:38 PM

I'll see it. I've always been a fan of Sam Raimi (even without Bruce Campbell).
I thought his last movie was ****ing fantastic:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...agmetohell.jpg

QuikSsurfer 07-12-2012 08:40 PM

Mila Kunis, Michelle Williams and Rachel Weisz???
My penis will be tortured.

petegz28 07-12-2012 08:47 PM

looks pretty cool

kysirsoze 07-12-2012 08:53 PM

If only there was a subforum for this.

Bambi 07-12-2012 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 8736115)
If only there was a subforum for this.

I considered it but this is what we've all been waiting for for years. Besides... it's Kansas City.

Bambi 07-12-2012 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSsurfer (Post 8736094)
Mila Kunis, Michelle Williams and Rachel Weisz???
My penis will be tortured.

Yea, a bit overloaded. But if anyone can handle it it's my boy Franco.

kysirsoze 07-12-2012 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8736120)
I considered it but this is what we've all been waiting for for years. Besides... it's Kansas City.

LMAO

KcMizzou 07-12-2012 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSsurfer (Post 8736088)
I'll see it. I've always been a fan of Sam Raimi (even without Bruce Campbell).
I thought his last movie was ****ing fantastic:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...agmetohell.jpg

Bought the DVD. After I pirated it.

listopencil 07-12-2012 09:47 PM

This could be a great movie if they use more of the source material than the Judy Garland movie. I already saw a bit of that in the trailer. I'll take the kids to this.

RunKC 07-12-2012 10:45 PM

This is going to piss a lot of old people off.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-12-2012 10:48 PM

No way I'm seeing this. You don't **** with the classics.

007 07-12-2012 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736437)
No way I'm seeing this. You don't **** with the classics.

This is all pre- Wizard of Oz. I don't see the issue.

Dante84 07-12-2012 10:54 PM

**** yes. That looks awesome.

And what a cool idea, to do a prequel!

Chiefs Pantalones 07-12-2012 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8736443)
This is all pre- Wizard of Oz. I don't see the issue.

It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

007 07-12-2012 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736459)
It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

Eh. I love the original but my kids don't at all. I have no problem with freshing it up to bring in a new generation.

Maybe it will be horrible. Then again, maybe it will be great. They have a good set of actors so who knows. I'm looking forward to it.

buddha 07-12-2012 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736459)
It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

ROFL Yeah...good luck with that! ROFL

Chiefs Pantalones 07-12-2012 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8736470)
Eh. I love the original but my kids don't at all. I have no problem with freshing it up to bring in a new generation.

Maybe it will be horrible. Then again, maybe it will be great. They have a good set of actors so who knows. I'm looking forward to it.

Franco did get it right with what he said in the trailer... "Kansas is full of great men." :)

Chiefs Pantalones 07-12-2012 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8736479)
ROFL Yeah...good luck with that! ROFL

I know tall order lol

007 07-12-2012 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736502)
Franco did get it right with what he said in the trailer... "Kansas is full of great men." :)

LMAO Queue Frazod.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-12-2012 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8736506)
LMAO Queue Frazod.

LMAO uh oh.

I'll probably see it too. It doesn't look too bad after watching it a second time.

Otter 07-12-2012 11:55 PM

Judging by the trailer it's far from a re-make which is good. Is that dude supposed to become Oz, the bumbling fat dude behind the curtain?

007 07-13-2012 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 8736616)
Judging by the trailer it's far from a re-make which is good. Is that dude supposed to become Oz, the bumbling fat dude behind the curtain?

that is what I took away from it. I would imagine, if this does well, we will see a remake of the original.

Deberg_1990 07-13-2012 06:08 AM

Love me sum Sam Raimi....althought this looks a little "Tim Burton" like.


Love the effect of how it starts out boxy 1:37 to 1 then opens up wide once they get to Oz. A few other movies that used this effect were Galaxy Quest and Horse Whisperer if you saw them in theaters. The home video versions took it out.

Bambi 07-13-2012 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736459)
It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

The Wheelie dudes don't care...

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_kRuD6zV4Fq.../ishot-365.jpg

durtyrute 07-13-2012 07:44 AM

What's the need for the dramatic ass music in a Wizard of Oz trailer? See kids, Oz is badass. Get the **** outta here with that noise.








Well watch........................................













































































on netflix

CoMoChief 07-14-2012 07:53 AM

When I was little I used to have re-occurring nightmares about those flying monkeys snatching me up to take me away.

Fire Me Boy! 07-14-2012 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 8739533)
When I was little I used to have re-occurring nightmares about those flying monkeys snatching me up to take me away.

When I was little, the entrance of the flying monkeys was when we'd shut the show off and watch The Dukes of Hazzard.

listopencil 07-15-2012 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 8736433)
This is going to piss a lot of old people off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736437)
No way I'm seeing this. You don't **** with the classics.

If they get pissed it's only because they didn't read any of the books, and the original movie already ****ed with a classic. If anything this looks like an attempt to be more true to the source material.

listopencil 07-15-2012 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736459)
It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

Hollywood ****ed up the story to begin with. You fell in love with a Judy Garland vehicle. Maybe now you can see and appreciate the actual story.

Hammock Parties 07-16-2012 02:46 AM

**** disney!! freaking horrible idea to try to do something with the best movie ever made!! god damnit i hate the way movies are being done these days... There hasnt been an epic movie that will be remembered, other than avatar, for the past 10-15 years if feels like, jesus...

007 07-16-2012 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001 (Post 8743916)
**** disney!! freaking horrible idea to try to do something with the best movie ever made!! god damnit i hate the way movies are being done these days... There hasnt been an epic movie that will be remembered, other than avatar, for the past 10-15 years if feels like, jesus...

Avatar?

Hammock Parties 07-16-2012 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8743922)
Avatar?

aka dances with smurfs

Agent V 07-16-2012 09:57 AM

If you're outraged by this, chill the **** out. While it's derivative of the original source material for Oz (L. Frank Baum's work), it's clearly not a remake of the first film. It's an exploration of that same universe. Looks like an origin story of the Wizard, which I'm very interested in seeing. Are you pissed that Wicked exists, too?

The Franchise 07-16-2012 10:02 AM

Can I still watch this and listen to Pink Floyd?

Fire Me Boy! 07-16-2012 10:05 AM

There's several of these coming out soon. ABC is working on a miniseries based on the book Wicked, while there's a film in the words for the musical version of Wicked (and they are remarkably different stories).

007 07-16-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 8744242)
There's several of these coming out soon. ABC is working on a miniseries based on the book Wicked, while there's a film in the words for the musical version of Wicked (and they are remarkably different stories).

Not surpised. Once Upon a Time has hoped the door for a lot more fantasy on television.

sd4chiefs 11-15-2012 12:04 AM

Trailer 2 looks bad ass.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Qy2fJsCkUn4?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Sorter 11-15-2012 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001 (Post 8743916)
**** disney!! freaking horrible idea to try to do something with the best movie ever made!! god damnit i hate the way movies are being done these days... There hasnt been an epic movie that will be remembered, other than avatar, for the past 10-15 years if feels like, jesus...

Really? You chose a Pocahontas/Dances with Wolves ripoff?LMAOLMAO

Jenson71 11-15-2012 12:37 AM

Looks awesome.

Silock 11-15-2012 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001 (Post 8743916)
**** disney!! freaking horrible idea to try to do something with the best movie ever made!! god damnit i hate the way movies are being done these days... There hasnt been an epic movie that will be remembered, other than avatar, for the past 10-15 years if feels like, jesus...

Along with what everyone else said, "best movie ever made" was The Wizard of Oz? REALLY?

DJ's left nut 11-15-2012 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 8736459)
It shouldn't be touched in any way. Prequel, sequel, I don't care. Hollywood needs to stop.

Stop what?

Stealing ideas? The Wizard of Oz was taken from a book. The 'original' was stolen. And it's not like they're removing guns and replacing them with radios, ala Spielberg here. This is a genuinely 'new' story.

This isn't touching a classic. Hell, it's not even expounding on it.

This is a freakin' cool idea and has been put in the hands of some very qualified people (both the director and the actors).

To not make this movie just because the first one was great is nuts. This appears to be a very good movie in its own right.

I'll probably go see it.

listopencil 11-15-2012 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 8739700)
When I was little, the entrance of the flying monkeys was when we'd shut the show off and watch The Dukes of Hazzard.

When I was little the Dukes of Hazzard had flying monkeys in it.

vailpass 11-15-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 9120296)
Along with what everyone else said, "best movie ever made" was The Wizard of Oz? REALLY?

Don Corleone just put a stop to this talk. Apparently he made the Wizard an offer he couldn't refuse.

BigCatDaddy 11-15-2012 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9120745)
Stop what?

Stealing ideas? The Wizard of Oz was taken from a book. The 'original' was stolen. And it's not like they're removing guns and replacing them with radios, ala Spielberg here. This is a genuinely 'new' story.

This isn't touching a classic. Hell, it's not even expounding on it.

This is a freakin' cool idea and has been put in the hands of some very qualified people (both the director and the actors).

To not make this movie just because the first one was great is nuts. This appears to be a very good movie in its own right.

I'll probably go see it.

Plus there was already a sequel made in 85.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_Oz

vailpass 11-15-2012 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slick (Post 9120801)
Plus there was already a sequel made in 85.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_Oz

When I was a kid in Catholic junior high we had to sing songs for one of our recitals from another Oz remake: The Qiz.

"Ease on down, ease on down, ease on down the ro-oad!"

Fire Me Boy! 11-15-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9120745)
Stop what?

Stealing ideas? The Wizard of Oz was taken from a book. The 'original' was stolen. And it's not like they're removing guns and replacing them with radios, ala Spielberg here. This is a genuinely 'new' story.

This isn't touching a classic. Hell, it's not even expounding on it.

This is a freakin' cool idea and has been put in the hands of some very qualified people (both the director and the actors).

To not make this movie just because the first one was great is nuts. This appears to be a very good movie in its own right.

I'll probably go see it.

I just want to stick up for Spielberg. He's gone on the record saying he regrets doing that, and the Blu-Ray that was recently released is the original theatrical cut, not digital enhancements, no CGI added.

Quote:

For myself, I tried [changing a film] once and lived to regret it. Not because of fan outrage, but because I was disappointed in myself. I got overly sensitive to [some of the reaction] to E.T., and I thought if technology evolved, [I might go in and change some things]…it was OK for a while, but I realized what I had done was I had robbed people who loved E.T. of their memories of E.T. [...] If I put just one cut of E.T. on Blu-ray and it was the 1982, would anyone object to that? [The crowd yells "NO!" in unison.] OK, so be it.
We're not talking about the diabolical evil of Lucas making Greedo shoot first. We're talking about a guy who got caught up in the moment and made a mistake.

A Salt Weapon 11-15-2012 11:55 AM

Awesome can't wait to see this.

vailpass 11-15-2012 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9120903)
I just want to stick up for Spielberg. He's gone on the record saying he regrets doing that, and the Blu-Ray that was recently released is the original theatrical cut, not digital enhancements, no CGI added.



We're not talking about the diabolical evil of Lucas making Greedo shoot first. We're talking about a guy who got caught up in the moment and made a mistake.

I just have no idea what you guys are talking about but it seems like you mean it.

DJ's left nut 11-15-2012 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9120903)
I just want to stick up for Spielberg. He's gone on the record saying he regrets doing that, and the Blu-Ray that was recently released is the original theatrical cut, not digital enhancements, no CGI added.



We're not talking about the diabolical evil of Lucas making Greedo shoot first. We're talking about a guy who got caught up in the moment and made a mistake.

Guns.
Radios.

Apologize away, Steven. I'm sure Dahmer felt bad about that whole 'eating people' thing as well.

Deberg_1990 03-04-2013 09:24 AM

reviews filtering out. 75% on RT

Some like it, others not so much.....


http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/oz_t..._and_powerful/

Deberg_1990 03-09-2013 05:04 PM

Just watched it today with the kids. It was pretty good. I thought Raimi would water down his style, but was pleasantly surprised how much of a true Raimi movie it was. It had a few intense scenes that would scare younger children.

Fat Elvis 03-09-2013 05:27 PM

We saw it this afternoon and thoroughly enjoyed it. One thing to consider if you see it (or any movie) in 3D; sit back farther from the screen than you normally would. I think the 3D effect is better than if you sit too close to the screen.

(FTR, I'm someone who likes to sit in the lower third of a theater because I like for a screen to fill my entire field of vision, but in a 3D movie you lose some of the effect because of your eyes moving around.)

Deberg_1990 03-09-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9480729)
We saw it this afternoon and thoroughly enjoyed it. One thing to consider if you see it (or any movie) in 3D; sit back farther from the screen than you normally would. I think the 3D effect is better than if you sit too close to the screen.

(FTR, I'm someone who likes to sit in the lower third of a theater because I like for a screen to fill my entire field of vision, but in a 3D movie you lose some of the effect because of your eyes moving around.)

We didn't see it in 3D because I have grown to hate 3D. But this would have been a fun movie to see in that format. Good movie, better than I expected.

ILChief 03-09-2013 07:20 PM

Saw it today. Really good. Our daughters liked it except for the beginning black and white part. And our younger daughter was scared of the witch

lcarus 03-09-2013 11:57 PM

I'm really interested in seeing this.

Chiefs Pantalones 03-10-2013 02:04 PM

The wifey and I are about to see this now. Looking forward to it.

Chiefs Pantalones 03-10-2013 05:00 PM

We loved it. It was visually amazing and the 3D was refreshing. It's usually choppy but this was impressive. Great acting and great family film.

listopencil 03-10-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9120938)
I just have no idea what you guys are talking about but it seems like you mean it.

lolwut?

gblowfish 03-11-2013 09:17 AM

I saw this yesterday at Union Station with my wifey. I enjoyed it. The 3D takes some getting used to. But Mila Kunis wears tight black leather pants in 3D....daddy likey!!!

Demonpenz 03-11-2013 09:19 AM

The 3D was awesome. Theatre was packed. Good to see.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.