ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   The Lounge (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Nick Foles News (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270264)

htismaqe 02-22-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 9424981)
Sucks but it might be the LT from A&M


Q: What do you think you'll do with Branden Albert?
Reid: "We haven't gone through all that. I had him in because he had a fairly significant injury, so we've kind of got to work through that. I've got to see how all that works out."
"...he had a fairly significant injury...""Fairly significant injury" is what jumped out at me. Albert took his physical several weeks ago and it was leaked by his camp that he passed the physical. I noted back then that him passing a physical means very little because there's a huge difference between a team feeling a player is healthy and a team feeling a player is healthy enough to give him $50 million.
Back then, we didn't think Albert's back injury, which cost him time last year, was a big deal. But Reid's words "fairly significant injury" have me wondering about that.
Maybe I'm just reading way too much into this. Maybe. But Reid hardly gives any detailed information out so this jumped out at me.

Reading way too much into that statement from Reid.

BossChief 02-22-2013 09:52 AM

Chip Kelly said he isn't trading Foles and that's that. He said he looks forward to seeing him on the practice squad.

Anything the Chiefs do to try to get him would be tampering.

ChiefRocka 02-22-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9425012)
Chip Kelly said he isn't trading Foles and that's that. He said he looks forward to seeing him on the practice squad.

Anything the Chiefs do to try to get him would be tampering.

Why should we believe him again? :hmmm:

ChiefRocka 02-22-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9425005)
Reading way too much into that statement from Reid.

Oh I agree no one knows shit BUT if his back is lets just say 60% would that sway anyones opinion taking a QB at #1 this year...it would sway mine.

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-22-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9425012)
Chip Kelly said he isn't trading Foles and that's that. He said he looks forward to seeing him on the practice squad.

Anything the Chiefs do to try to get him would be tampering.


THIS. Thread over !

ChiefRocka 02-22-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 9425024)
THIS. Thread over !

definitely staying at Oregon

BossChief 02-22-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9424882)
Because it's not his call. It's up to the Eagles to decide whether or not Foles is available.

Right now, that's all Andy Reid CAN say. Otherwise, he's guilty of tampering.

Yup

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9425005)
Reading way too much into that statement from Reid.

I agree.

They are in contract negotiation and have said as much...Reid can't say anything good or bad while Dorsey is working on an extension.

BossChief 02-22-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 9425015)
Why should we believe him again? :hmmm:

Because if he wanted to trade him, he destroyed the value for doing so by closing the door like that. Now, Chip would have to call KC and be like "still interested?"

"sure, for a 5th"

The Pest 02-22-2013 10:03 AM

If Foles is going to get traded.....it'll be right before the draft or after the draft. Teams with a high enough pick are going to want to sit down with the QBs and see if any of them fit what they're looking for. If they aren't.....then they can approach the Eagles for Foles.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 9425022)
Oh I agree no one knows shit BUT if his back is lets just say 60% would that sway anyones opinion taking a QB at #1 this year...it would sway mine.

Why?

Jamaal Charles had arguably his best game of the season behind Donald Stephenson.

NOTHING is more important than getting a QB. NOTHING.

BossChief 02-22-2013 10:14 AM

We have three players with left tackle experience.

Albert
Stephenson
Allen

We have total crap at quarterback.

This should be easy.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9425066)
We have three players with left tackle experience.

Albert
Stephenson
Allen

We have total crap at quarterback.

This should be easy.

http://www.emotioneric.com/takingcandyfromababy.jpg

The Pest 02-22-2013 10:19 AM

I've said it before....and I'll say it again. Drafting Joeckel would be a waste of 3 draft picks.

1st overall pick
Donald Stephenson's pick
Brandon Albert's pick

And like BossChief said....you could even include Jeff Allen's pick in there as well.

Sorter 02-22-2013 10:22 AM

This man http://a.espncdn.com/combiner/i?img=...ng&w=350&h=254

and this man http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images...jpg?1260002279

officially give a big **** you to Joeckel.

BigMeatballDave 02-23-2013 11:30 AM

Report: Kansas City Chiefs told Nick Foles unavailable

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...isnt-on-market


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.