ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Banner Choices rd 2 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267786)

pr_capone 12-17-2012 10:34 PM

Banner Choices rd 2
 
NEW QB - NEW GM - NEW HOPE - SOC (new)

ALL WE WANT FOR XMAS IS A NEW GM - SOC (#1 from prev poll)

#1 QB IN - OLD GM OUT - THANKS CLARK! - SOC (#2 from prev poll)

We will have at least one more round... perhaps more. keep suggesting and tweeking what you see or adding new things.

no asking for a specific player

BossChief 12-17-2012 10:38 PM

The first one

A Salt Weapon 12-17-2012 10:52 PM

PIOLI = FRANCHISE AIDS - SOC?
Posted via Mobile Device

quailchaser 12-17-2012 10:54 PM

I orginally voted for the second one, but now im leaning towards the first.

In58men 12-17-2012 10:54 PM

No to "new QB new GM"


If we want a new QB it'll just be Alex Smith.


We need to draft a #1 QB people.

AussieChiefsFan 12-17-2012 10:58 PM

woops, meant to vote this one:

NEW QB - NEW GM - NEW HOPE - SOC (new)

KCrockaholic 12-17-2012 11:09 PM

I'm cool with #1 or 2

Hammock Parties 12-17-2012 11:10 PM

First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

wazu 12-17-2012 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon (Post 9219989)
PIOLI = FRANCHISE AIDS - SOC?
Posted via Mobile Device

Changing my vote to this.

Nightfyre 12-17-2012 11:12 PM

Clark, baby, Put a QB under our tree - SOC.com

is the homage apparent enough?

wazu 12-17-2012 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9220031)
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

That was my concern as well.

RealSNR 12-17-2012 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9220031)
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

This.

wazu 12-17-2012 11:24 PM

On the other hand, just using "New" three times probably has more of an effect.

Munson 12-17-2012 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9220031)
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

Word.

RealSNR 12-17-2012 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9220059)
On the other hand, just using "New" three times probably has more of an effect.

NEW GM, NEW COACH, NEW QB, BUT **** DRAFTING TE'O OR JARVIS JONES AT #1 OVERALL OR TRADING DOWN YOU STUPID GODDAMN TRUE FANS THIS IS KANSAS CITY'S FIRST CHANCE TO DRAFT A REAL QB IN 3 DECADES, SO DON'T ****ING SCREW THIS UP, CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.