**** Albert. I don't really care about him one way or another. The implications of trading him piss me off though.

No, it's replacing him with the #1 overall pick.

Are you hearing anything about them finding any takers to trade down? If we get a 2nd for Albert and can snag another 2nd or 3rd to move down and still get Fisher that would be the best case considering the whole ****ed up situation.

I still refuse to believe Dorsey is this stupid.

5.5 sacks allowed per year. 1 more than Joe Thomas.


But hey... when you can get rid of a player like that and then draft his replacement first overall, that's a move you just have to make.

The best thing about this is nothing.

He have up two 2nd round picks for Alex Smith. What's so hard to believe?

Might as well.

****, should probably trade Tamba. Dorsey/Reid could probably get a 4th for him and a 4th for Flowers as well.

You don't think he's valuable? Some teams are willing to spend a #1 pick for a good left tackle.

We're literally pissing away the #1 pick.

This is just indefensible.

Albert was a 1st round pick AND he is proven solid. Getting the 54 th for him would be horrible.

So we use the 15th pick to get a LT that will net us the 42nd pick, maybe when joeckel pans out we can trade him for the 27th pick and get a LT.

Soooo essentially it's 1.1, what amounts to basically another first rounder, and Albert for Smith, Joeckel/Fisher, and a lower 2nd rounder...

:facepalm:

I almost went he Hali route - but then I thought about it and decided they might just do that to unload his contract. So I went with Houston instead - which to me, is a more valid comparison because Hali is past his prime, where Houston is just entering his (like Albert.)

Eh, we're giving him away at a discount.

The team trading for him has to pay us AND pay him.