Trading the Royals
 

This thread or some version of it may have been done before, but I'm curious (and lazy).

Let's say that you have supreme control over KC sports teams. Let's also say that these teams are tradeable just like a player or other commodity.

The hypothetical teams in this scenario share the same positions (28th) in their respective ESPN power rankings. You can trade the Royals for:

1. The Washington Capitals (NHL)
2. The New York Knicks (NBA)

Or, of course, you can keep your beloved Royals.

EDIT: Of course the teams would stay in their respective leagues and play their respective sports. (Thanks for being a smart guy, ENDelt:)) I know this throws divisions off and stuff too, just vote in the damn poll!

The Royals would probably have more success in the Atlantic Division than the Knicks, though.

Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.

Where are on Chiefs plan-et ... what is this word smart you speak of?

Yeah because smart organizations know that when it comes to making money, it's better to lose money... ?

The Ice Skates wouldnt Make it to First base

I.. don't... get it....

Cards fan's need a good weekend get away series each year that's close by in a beautiful stadium, more than half empty.

Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.

Keep the Royals. MLB and NFL are the two sports that make you a big league city. NBA and NHL are nice but baseball and football are the biggies.

Oh ya, well you're ugly :harumph:

:(

Whats this Announcement thats going to happen?

Keep the Royals. The Knicks don't have Alex Gordon and Billy Butler.

This would guarantee each first inning supplying more than enough runs to win that day because if the pitcher got close to the plate the gear gets hit (free base) otherwise the balls are way outside. (Pitchers would not throw inside, hockey players know how to fight.)