ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 18 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Andy Reid with Peter King (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268926)

BigMeatballDave 01-15-2013 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9322266)
I've seen about enough of Moeaki...
He's solid depth.

How can you possibly evaluate any receivers with the shitfest we saw at QB?

Prison Bitch 01-15-2013 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9321185)
Reid: "Before I interviewed with the Chiefs, I looked at every snap from every [Kansas City] game this year.

Holy crap. He's a better man than I. ROFL

Rausch 01-15-2013 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9322291)
He's solid depth.

How can you possibly evaluate any receivers with the shitfest we saw at QB?
How can you possibly evaluate a player that's never healthy?...

DaneMcCloud 01-15-2013 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9322290)
Yes, if he expects every drafted player to pan out, then yeah.

In reality, he's probably aware that won't happen.

Plus, He's probably just sandbagging with the 3 years comment.
:facepalm:

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-15-2013 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9322294)
How can you possibly evaluate a player that's never healthy?...
You just did.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-15-2013 07:51 PM
Teams with good personnel departments should be able to add 3+ starters on a team this devoid of talent. Doesn't mean you'd do the same to SF's rosters, as the players are better.

This team should have the goal of five new starters next year who are starter quality (or will become it).

Three through the draft
One through FA
Another one through UDFA, especially given our lack of depth at Ted backer and WR.

That's the goal. Above that is gravy. Below that is a failure.

WhiteWhale 01-15-2013 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9322299)
:facepalm:
What?

If it takes anyone three ****ing seasons to turn this team around they are incompetent.

DaneMcCloud 01-15-2013 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9322318)
What?

If it takes anyone three ****ing seasons to turn this team around they are incompetent.
Really? I hadn't heard.

BossChief 01-15-2013 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9321649)
I don't think that good teams go into the season looking to replace 17 players.

Sure, you might lose a couple to free agency and maybe you've drafted 4-5 guys that are immediately ready for the 53 man roster.

But 17? 1/3 of your roster?

That's quite a bit of turnover for a "good" team.
Immediate needs for starters:
CB
S
ILB
LDE
RDE
WR2
WR3
QB

Depth needs

TE1/2
LT
G
C
RB
LDE
ILB
LOLB
ROLB
S

Chris Meck 01-15-2013 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9321649)
I don't think that good teams go into the season looking to replace 17 players.

Sure, you might lose a couple to free agency and maybe you've drafted 4-5 guys that are immediately ready for the 53 man roster.

But 17? 1/3 of your roster?

That's quite a bit of turnover for a "good" team.
Well yeah, but we're clearly not good. There are some pieces here, and maybe some youngsters that can be molded, but we're pretty shitty.

.

-King- 01-15-2013 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9321314)
3 players? JFC, if you're only hitting on 3 players in the draft, you ****ing suck.

***** ****ing sucked and he hit on more than that.
And again... even the best teams hit on only 3-4 draft picks per year.

Chris Meck 01-15-2013 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9322313)
Teams with good personnel departments should be able to add 3+ starters on a team this devoid of talent. Doesn't mean you'd do the same to SF's rosters, as the players are better.

This team should have the goal of five new starters next year who are starter quality (or will become it).

Three through the draft
One through FA
Another one through UDFA, especially given our lack of depth at Ted backer and WR.

That's the goal. Above that is gravy. Below that is a failure.
That seems about right. It also seems do-able.

DaneMcCloud 01-15-2013 08:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9322326)
Immediate needs for starters:
CB
S
ILB
LDE
RDE
WR2
WR3
QB

Depth needs

TE1/2
LT
G
C
RB
LDE
ILB
LOLB
ROLB
S
The Chiefs aren't a good team.

DaneMcCloud 01-15-2013 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9322338)
And again... even the best teams hit on only 3-4 draft picks per year.
Bullshit.

Do you even watch the NFL?

BigMeatballDave 01-15-2013 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9322294)
How can you possibly evaluate a player that's never healthy?...
He missed a season.

Just like Berry and JC did.

In 3 seasons in the NFL, Moeaki has been active 30 games.

Berry: 33

Is Berry injury prone?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 PM.
Page 5 of 18 1234 5 678915 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.