Quote:
yeah well, sometimes you have to start with a light jab |
Quote:
On the other hand, which world is this where "Cassel's fine as a backup?" I can't COMPREHEND how anybody would even trust cassel to test toilets because he craps his pants so often, much less be our backup. |
Philly needs QBs just as bad as KC does. Foles may not fit Kellys offense, but he's likely the best/most experienced QB on his roster, and he's already paid for. They aren't going to let him go for anything less than too much.
|
Quote:
This is just like people suggesting trading a 2nd round pick for Cousins. WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? Why trade draft value for guys that don't hold that much value? If you want to trade for a backup, fine. We need a backup QB. But don't overpay. It's that simple. |
Quote:
I don't think a single person said "trade for Foles and forget drafting a QB". This is about the possibility of trading to increase the total talent level at the QB position for us. Competition. If people want to discuss how much Foles is worth in trade then fine. |
Quote:
If you want to continue posting, do it. If you don't? Bye. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
As for Cassel as a backup, why in the world would we pay $7.5M for him to be a backup? There are more talented veterans out there. I still wonder if the Chiefs will look into Kolb (as a backup). Not saying that's a great decision, but it wouldn't surprise me if the Cards cut ties with him and there's the obvious Reid connection. I feel like he could be had at a high-priced veteran contract. |
Quote:
Why give up a higher pick for Foles when you could potentially get the same thing out of a late round draft pick this year? When you trade higher picks for QBs on somebody else's rosters you're creating an expectation that they won't be the BACKUP. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.