ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 1 gap 3-4; how do you think it will shake out? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268761)

Sorter 01-11-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9306267)
From what I can tell, though, Rex Ryan's system isn't a 1-gap. It is the hybrid 46 that still has the NT playing a zero technique.

Am I way off base, here?

Rex's system is but IIRC, Sutton calls for more pure 1-gap (shades from the NT) than Rex. Additionally, Rex isn't a true 46 recently and does have his nose and DEs play more 1-gap philosophies.

Sorter 01-11-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9306319)
Bailey has no quickness, get off or pass rush moves.

He's probably gonna be cut.

I don't know if he's cut but at this point, it wouldn't surprise me. Really thought he was going to progress this year and then, nothing. I mean, nothing.

O.city 01-11-2013 03:55 PM

So since we are likely staying 1 gap, here's my early free agency picks.


William Moore at safety, Richard Seymour (if he's released)

Sorter 01-11-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9306379)
tha **** are you talking about? Bailey played 34RDE in a 2 gap against LT's you idiot. He actually typically played LDE against RTs and the 3tech in our subs which we ran extensively.

And Poe is plenty quick off the ball -- he was playing 2 gap techniques as well, so he did not look real good this year, but slow off the ball he was not.He didn't play 2-gap in our sub packages which we played in quite a bit.

Dorsey is slow, but quick off the ball. so what. he's got nothing for the NFL. But at least he was given 5 ****ing seasons to improve.

Poe needs time, he's lacking technique -- that was his MO coming up. Had nothing to do with his ability to get off the ball.


You know what, you're an asshole for even tossing these guys out after 1 & 2 seasons. You know damn well DL players require 3 or more seasons to develop.

As to the last point, that simply isn't true anymore. Guys drafted in the first two rounds are typically expected to produce and at the very least, flash occasionally. Try telling your development theory to Watt, Wilkerson, Suh (who is overrated), McCoy.

Ace Gunner 01-11-2013 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9306387)
Actually, he didn't.

Most of his snaps came in sub packages as a pass rusher.

And he was ****ing horrible.

He's a guy who's built like a tank with some straight line speed (4.75ish if I recall). That's it.

He's probably not even an NFL player. Should get into pro wrestling.

He was lined up on the LT even during subs, wendler. he disappointed, yes. But I am not going to say he has peaked or isn't going to stick in the NFL. Hell, I don't even know why we are so stuck on the guy, other than to give him another go or not. This defense is lacking DL. He'll likely get another op, at least a look during TC etc. No idea if he sticks, but his initial step isn't the problem, he simply needs to learn how to play the game/his position at this level as most players do.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9306470)
He was lined up on the LT even during subs, wendler. he disappointed, yes. But I am not going to say he has peaked or isn't going to stick in the NFL. Hell, I don't even know why we are so stuck on the guy, other than to give him another go or not. This defense is lacking DL. He'll likely get another op, at least a look during TC etc. No idea if he sticks, but his initial step isn't the problem, he simply needs to learn how to play the game/his position at this level as most players do.

Uhh, no he was not. ROFL

Ace Gunner 01-11-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306454)
As to the last point, that simply isn't true anymore. Guys drafted in the first two rounds are typically expected to produce and at the very least, flash occasionally. Try telling your development theory to Watt, Wilkerson, Suh (who is overrated), McCoy.

all exceptions to the rule and you aren't considering the player's draft position/rating etc.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9306379)
tha **** are you talking about? Bailey played 34RDE in a 2 gap against LT's you idiot. He's small/short for the position if anything. Had poor hand technique, yadayada.

And Poe is plenty quick off the ball -- he was playing 2 gap techniques as well, so he did not look real good this year, but slow off the ball he was not.

Dorsey is slow, but quick off the ball. so what. he's got nothing for the NFL. But at least he was given 5 ****ing seasons to improve.

Poe needs time, he's lacking technique -- that was his MO coming up. Had nothing to do with his ability to get off the ball.


You know what, you're an asshole for even tossing these guys out after 1 & 2 seasons. You know damn well DL players require 3 or more seasons to develop.

What does the fact that he played the 5-tech against LTs really poorly have to do with anything I just said?

He got abused off the line while doing it. He sucks ass at getting off the ball, that's why he was garbage as a 5-tech.

And yes, Poe was slow off the ball. He has a tendency to lose his leverage and 'fall' into defenders rather than explode into them. It's not like he's missing the snap count, he just utilizes poor technique off the snap. I'm by no means giving up on him and in fact expect very good things out of him in the future. The fact remains that he has work to do in this regard.

As to Dorsey...well you're just wrong. Dorsey's not amazing, but he's a starter in this league and will start for someone next year. Allen Bailey will never have the NFL career that Dorsey has had precisely because he doesn't get off the ball.

You just keep exposing your idiocy here. Though I do love that you begin and end each display with some sort of juvenile blather.

By all means, keep it up.

Ace Gunner 01-11-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306476)
Uhh, no he was not. ROFL

oooooooooooooh yes he waaaaaaaaaaaaaas.LMAO

he played under the LT a lot as I recall.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306476)
Uhh, no he was not. ROFL


LMAO.

How exactly in the **** does that even remotely look like a 4-tech head up on a tackle?

http://draftbreakdown.com/wp-content...eifs-front.jpg

Additionally, this subpckg is a 2-4-5 which is not our most common sub variant.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9306487)
oooooooooooooh yes he waaaaaaaaaaaaaas.LMAO

he played under the LT a lot as I recall.

Here;s an example of our 2-3-6 against NE. Bailey plays the same position as Tyson in subs and base fronts; Tyson is playing the 3 tech in b/w the RG and RT.

http://imageshack.us/a/img685/600/connolly1.png

Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

O.city 01-11-2013 04:12 PM

Good grief, Jackson put on a shit ton of weight this year. No wonder he sucked so much asshole.

Jackson is weird, cause if he could do what he did at LSU, he'd fit the 1 gap scheme pretty well. He was a high motor guy there. The 2 gap Romeo bullshit has infected this whole org.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306497)
Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

When he called Goatse "Wendler" it ocurred to me that, while the name is new, he's clearly not a noob. So I looked at his post count and realized he'd been here awhile.

Then I hovered over his screen name and realize it was Lou_Zare.

Then I punched myself in the balls for wasting time responding to that assclown. He's Blackbobian in his ability to be wrong. Every. Single. Time.

And he adds his Blackbobian understanding of the game with a Dane-like streak if prickishness anytime anyone dares point out his inanity.

I'm thinking any additional effort put into schooling this ****tard is wasted effort.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9306505)
When he called Goatse "Wendler" it ocurred to me that, while the name is new, he's clearly not a noob. So I looked at his post count and realized he'd been here awhile.

Then I hovered over his screen name and realize it was Lou_Zare.

Then I punched myself in the balls for wasting time responding to that assclown. He's Blackbobian in his ability to be wrong. Every. Single. Time.

And he adds his Blackbobian understanding of the game with a Dane-like streak if prickishness anytime anyone dares point out his inanity.

I'm thinking any additional effort put into schooling this ****tard is wasted effort.

**** me. Should have known.

saphojunkie 01-11-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306441)
Rex's system is but IIRC, Sutton calls for more pure 1-gap (shades from the NT) than Rex. Additionally, Rex isn't a true 46 recently and does have his nose and DEs play more 1-gap philosophies.

Pestilence posted a great breakdown in the "Reid finalizing..." thread. Basically he has coached in Every system known. I am not exactly pumped about the hire, but I am definitely withholding judgment.

Andy Reid gets some slack to take at least one or two chances on his staff.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9306517)
Pestilence posted a great breakdown in the "Reid finalizing..." thread. Basically he has coached in Every system known. I am not exactly pumped about the hire, but I am definitely withholding judgment.

Andy Reid gets some slack to take at least one or two chances on his staff.

Yeah, I;m only enthused because of his experience in different systems + us staying in a 34 front. Guess the Cardinals told us to **** right on off about Horton. Bummer.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9306517)
Pestilence posted a great breakdown in the "Reid finalizing..." thread. Basically he has coached in Every system known. I am not exactly pumped about the hire, but I am definitely withholding judgment.

Andy Reid gets some slack to take at least one or two chances on his staff.

Here's my worry, though.

When Pioli hired Haley, my response to the Pioli-smokers was essentially "Hey, even if we assume he was the mastermind of the Patriots roster, we know he had nothing to do with hiring coaches so why take him at face value on the hiring?"

Pioli knew nothing about hiring head coaches so I was loathe to give him too much rope.

Well Reid's dicked up his last few DC hires....so why give him rope in this area?

I'm going to give him a chance because it's only fair, but I'm not giving him any more rope than I would have if Pioli had hired him. There's nothing in Reid's track record to suggest that he's worth a damn at finding qualified DCs.

Hammock Parties 01-11-2013 04:26 PM

Another reeruned baby seal just got the club.

Sorter 01-11-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9306538)
Another reeruned baby seal just got the club.

BOOM

O.city 01-11-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9306536)
Here's my worry, though.

When ***** hired Haley, my response to the *****-smokers was essentially "Hey, even if we assume he was the mastermind of the Patriots roster, we know he had nothing to do with hiring coaches so why take him at face value on the hiring?"

***** knew nothing about hiring head coaches so I was loathe to give him too much rope.

Well Reid's dicked up his last few DC hires....so why give him rope in this area?

I'm going to give him a chance because it's only fair, but I'm not giving him any more rope than I would have if ***** had hired him. There's nothing in Reid's track record to suggest that he's worth a damn at finding qualified DCs.

This.


The one thing I will give him credit for on this, is that it seems he went and got the guy who's style fits whats here, not forcing guys into roles they aren't as good at.

Titty Meat 01-11-2013 04:46 PM

Suttons record looks like Gunthers if he never had DT.

RunKC 01-11-2013 04:54 PM

Andy Reid's track record with DC's (outside of Jim Johnson) is below average.

This is an uninspiring hire to me.

But I'll see what happens.

saphojunkie 01-11-2013 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9306536)
Here's my worry, though.

When ***** hired Haley, my response to the *****-smokers was essentially "Hey, even if we assume he was the mastermind of the Patriots roster, we know he had nothing to do with hiring coaches so why take him at face value on the hiring?"

***** knew nothing about hiring head coaches so I was loathe to give him too much rope.

Well Reid's dicked up his last few DC hires....so why give him rope in this area?

I'm going to give him a chance because it's only fair, but I'm not giving him any more rope than I would have if ***** had hired him. There's nothing in Reid's track record to suggest that he's worth a damn at finding qualified DCs.

Yeah, I think that's about where I'm at. Love the Reid hire. Love the broad changes in the front office.

Overall, I am way more on the side of "players make the coach" and not the other way around, but I think we have earned the right to remain a little skeptical.

Nightfyre 01-11-2013 05:24 PM

As far as I am concerned, we should bring back the whole lot of lineman and re-evaluate them at the appropriate condition and within the new scheme. Let's be real. There is a lot of PHYSICAL talent in our D-Line. Who the **** knows how the two-gap read and react bullshit ****ed up their mental approach to the game.

Basically, we need to can our perception of these players under the read and react defense and give them a chance to show what they can do when they are just bulldozing a gap. I have a feeling the mental aspect of the 2-gap approach was slowing down many of these players' ability to effectively get off the line. I am going to give each of them a clean slate.

Ace Gunner 01-11-2013 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306497)
Here;s an example of our 2-3-6 against NE. Bailey plays the same position as Tyson in subs and base fronts; Tyson is playing the 3 tech in b/w the RG and RT.

http://imageshack.us/a/img685/600/connolly1.png

Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

Under is what I said, as in under front or inside the LT. Just because a DL lines up in a gap does not mean he's stuck there. there are many plays involving stunt/twist movements as you know.

JFC the children are coming out to play today.

We all know Bailey's odds of sticking in the NFL are slim, as is the case with most players drafted mid late rounds etc. I just want to hold up on calling him done.

Ace Gunner 01-11-2013 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306491)
LMAO.

How exactly in the **** does that even remotely look like a 4-tech head up on a tackle?

http://draftbreakdown.com/wp-content...eifs-front.jpg

Additionally, this subpckg is a 2-4-5 which is not our most common sub variant.

there, that's the look I'm talking about. From there, and depending on what the offense does, he often ends up taking on the LT from that spot. That is all I was saying.

Sorter 01-12-2013 01:52 AM

You're a ****ing mongoloid who can't tell the difference between different defensive alignments/techniques.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9306546)
This.


The one thing I will give him credit for on this, is that it seems he went and got the guy who's style fits whats here, not forcing guys into roles they aren't as good at.

Agreed. The hire is uninspiring. There's concerns, but also potential bright side.

My concern is that Sutton's track record has been anything but spectacular. My other concern is that he goes to 2-gap, which I imagine is what he ran under Mangini.

The bright side is... great to see Reid flexed schemes. Also he must have been very well respected for Rex to keep him on staff after Mangini was fired. Even if he got demoted, it's fairly unusual for a DC to stay on the team after he's fired. The other key points are that he's now familiar with the Rex Ryan scheme. Let's hope he's learned a thing or two. Also, in his first stint as DC, don't forget that he had to adjust a 4-3 into a 3-4, which can take some time to do.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 08:59 AM

Poe has the best potential by a mile of all those guys.

Why would anyone think to put him anywhere but the nose? Especially in a league where a nose with versatility to play across the line is becoming increasingly important?

cyborgtable 01-12-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9307649)
Agreed. The hire is uninspiring. There's concerns, but also potential bright side.

My concern is that Sutton's track record has been anything but spectacular. My other concern is that he goes to 2-gap, which I imagine is what he ran under Mangini.

The bright side is... great to see Reid flexed schemes. Also he must have been very well respected for Rex to keep him on staff after Mangini was fired. Even if he got demoted, it's fairly unusual for a DC to stay on the team after he's fired. The other key points are that he's now familiar with the Rex Ryan scheme. Let's hope he's learned a thing or two. Also, in his first stint as DC, don't forget that he had to adjust a 4-3 into a 3-4, which can take some time to do.

Yeah he ran a 2-gap under Mangini and the defense suffered, he also was part of a decent 1-gap 4-3 under Sperm and a very very good 1-gap under Ryan. I think he will run the 1-gap because the defense's he's been associated with were better and he will have the say. I agree with Clay on the run defense but with Flowers that should be mitigated to some extent if Sutton runs anything like Rex

Saccopoo 01-12-2013 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9305384)
Bailey and Powe suck.

You are wrong.

Ace Gunner 01-12-2013 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9307446)
You're a ****ing mongoloid who can't tell the difference between different defensive alignments/techniques.

and you're a whiny lil girl who has no idea what "the edge of the defense" even ****ing means.

Hali rushes the QB and Bailey sets the edge in that alignment you idiot and that is why he moves out to meet the LT.

JFC you have become a stupid ****ing dork.

Saccopoo 01-12-2013 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9306427)
I'm probably one of the biggest Bailey homers here and fully admit it is time to move on IMO.

I really thought that having Poe and Houston next to him in sub pckgs (whilst playing the 3 tech) would free him and enable him to do some great stuff. He didn't and extremely regressed this year. If you want to keep him on the roster as depth or even hope that he turns into an average player, fine. He was horrible this year after several decent flashes last year against Pitt, NE, and GB.

He needs to be upgraded.

You could make that statement about the entire defense.

These guys were so poorly coached, so fundamentally unsound that I'm giving everyone on this team a complete pass.

Bailey was primarily an attacking defensive end at Miami out of a 43. He was a legit 6'3", 285 lbs. at the combine with superb measurables. He led the Canes in sacks and TFL for two straight years and was a 1st Team All-Conference his senior year.

He was jammed into a two gap 34 or a 2-4-5 third down subpackage with shit coaching.

Two gap 34's require a decision by the linemen to choose the gap that they are going to hold right off the snap versus a 1 gap which is a presnap determined, upfield penetrating style that forces the offensive lineman to actively engage the defender versus the two gap which means to have the defender hold the o-linemen during their movements.

Bailey, Powe and Poe should all be better suited for a one gap style versus a two gap.

In fact, with the personel that we have, especially Poe and Berry, a 46 type of defense would actually be ideal. The only thing we're really missing from that is a big, press coverage corner. Someone just like Xavier Rhodes or David Amerson - one of which should be available with our first pick in the second round.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307771)
You could make that statement about the entire defense.

These guys were so poorly coached, so fundamentally unsound that I'm giving everyone on this team a complete pass.

Bailey was primarily an attacking defensive end at Miami out of a 43. He was a legit 6'3", 285 lbs. at the combine with superb measurables. He led the Canes in sacks and TFL for two straight years and was a 1st Team All-Conference his senior year.

He was jammed into a two gap 34 or a 2-4-5 third down subpackage with shit coaching.

Two gap 34's require a decision by the linemen to choose the gap that they are going to hold right off the snap versus a 1 gap which is a presnap determined, upfield penetrating style that forces the offensive lineman to actively engage the defender versus the two gap which means to have the defender hold the o-linemen during their movements.

Bailey, Powe and Poe should all be better suited for a one gap style versus a two gap.

In fact, with the personel that we have, especially Poe and Berry, a 46 type of defense would actually be ideal. The only thing we're really missing from that is a big, press coverage corner. Someone just like Xavier Rhodes or David Amerson - one of which should be available with our first pick in the second round.

I'm with you. We just don't know what we have in some of these players, especially young guys like Bailey. So much of D-line play is about intensity, and these guys played soft as shit. And I've said this before, but when you spend almost all your time learning 2-gap, there's not much room for teaching you how to play 1-gap principles.

I don't know what we have in Bailey, but I'd like to see how he responds to better coaching and full time commitment to 1-gap.

Fat Elvis 01-12-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9307674)
Poe has the best potential by a mile of all those guys.

Why would anyone think to put him anywhere but the nose? Especially in a league where a nose with versatility to play across the line is becoming increasingly important?

Haloti Ngata.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9307904)
Haloti Ngata.

Hmm... very good point.

I would still rather Poe be groomed to play more of a Wilfork role. I don't like the way traditional 0-techniques become such a huge liability in no-huddle. One of the reasons I really liked the Poe pick. I like having defensive personnel that can legitimately play every down.

mcaj22 01-12-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307738)
You are wrong.

sadly, he's right

Sully 01-12-2013 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58;
Defenses win championships

That hasn't been true for a while, now.

Sorter 01-12-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307771)
You could make that statement about the entire defense.

These guys were so poorly coached, so fundamentally unsound that I'm giving everyone on this team a complete pass.

Bailey was primarily an attacking defensive end at Miami out of a 43. He was a legit 6'3", 285 lbs. at the combine with superb measurables. He led the Canes in sacks and TFL for two straight years and was a 1st Team All-Conference his senior year.

He was jammed into a two gap 34 or a 2-4-5 third down subpackage with shit coaching.

Two gap 34's require a decision by the linemen to choose the gap that they are going to hold right off the snap versus a 1 gap which is a presnap determined, upfield penetrating style that forces the offensive lineman to actively engage the defender versus the two gap which means to have the defender hold the o-linemen during their movements.

Bailey, Powe and Poe should all be better suited for a one gap style versus a two gap.

In fact, with the personel that we have, especially Poe and Berry, a 46 type of defense would actually be ideal. The only thing we're really missing from that is a big, press coverage corner. Someone just like Xavier Rhodes or David Amerson - one of which should be available with our first pick in the second round.

I agree. However, Bailey has been playing 1-gap principles in sub packages this year and didn't do much with his reps. I hope I'm wrong as I would really love to see the guy pan out. At thisnpoint though, I think it would be wise to use a 2nd or 3rd on Hunt from SMU depending on how the draft shakes out.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9308149)
I agree. However, Bailey has been playing 1-gap principles in sub packages this year and didn't do much with his reps. I hope I'm wrong as I would really love to see the guy pan out. At thisnpoint though, I think it would be wise to use a 2nd or 3rd on Hunt from SMU depending on how the draft shakes out.

Yeah, but being a young guy, do you think Bailey's ever had the right training to play 1-gap? I would have to imagine that in his time with KC, the majority of his time was spent learning read-and-react 2-gap principles. Might look like a different layer if you coach him to be in attack mode at all times.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9308149)
I agree. However, Bailey has been playing 1-gap principles in sub packages this year and didn't do much with his reps. I hope I'm wrong as I would really love to see the guy pan out. At thisnpoint though, I think it would be wise to use a 2nd or 3rd on Hunt from SMU depending on how the draft shakes out.

Clark's going to draft himself :eek:

Sorter 01-12-2013 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9308158)
Clark's going to draft himself :eek:

It will be epic. Kiper's head will literally explode on air.

Nightfyre 01-12-2013 01:32 PM

Now that I would like to see.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9308160)
It will be epic. Kiper's head will literally explode on air.

That or his hair devours him, McShay, and Boomer.

Sorter 01-12-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9308164)
That or his hair devours him, McShay, and Boomer.

I'd prefer this actually.


Good idea for a sci-fi original movie too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.