Originally Posted by DarthPioliSatan (Post 9045487)

Lovin' life, could care less.

**** off.

Originally Posted by DarthPioliSatan (Post 9045446)

Aaaaaaaaand STILL better than Casshole.

Sanchez>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>INFINITY>>>>>Casshole and all his early lover and supporters.

Kay' / Thx/ Bye!

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 9045636)

I guess if you're in prison it's infinitely better to get raped by 3 guys than 7 guys, but at the end of the day your life still sucks and you know there's probably something better out there.

That's pretty much your whole Sanchez >>>>> Cassel bullshit.

Neither guy is worth a dog shit. If Sanchez is slightly less stank dogshit than Cassel, I can buy that. But he's still dogshit and wasn't the answer.

Originally Posted by DarthPioliSatan (Post 9045804)

And yet, better is still better/thread.

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9045956)

And you're still a ****ing jackass.

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 9044917)

And he'll be the handicap on that team. What part about that don't you get?

Cassel was starting this season. Being a starter doesn't mean he's REALLY the guy. It just means he's all you have to go with at that time, sometimes. They would upgrade from Sanchez if they could. The issue is, the team around him is too good. But he's the thing holding that team back from getting to a SB.

Drafting Sanchez would have been a fail.....just like I said it would have been.

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 9044820)

My take on this is a little different than most here.

I'm ALL FOR taking a QB in the first round. However, doing so doesn't come without the most major of risks. If you take a guy and he's a Jamarcus Russell or a David Carr or a Mark Sanchez, you can set your team back years and years. Then you draft another guy........and it possibly happens again. What I'm saying is, we could have been drafting first round QB's all this time, and be in the exact same boat.

On the flip side, it's ****ing hard to get my head around the fact that we haven't drafted a first round QB in 29 ****ing years.

That's like getting the clap when you lose your virginity then swearing off pussy forever. It makes no sense.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9046119)

Please re-read what I have been saying.

I'm saying that in the long run, Cassel was better for us than Sanchez. Cassel is gone at the end of this year. Who knows how long we'd have to suffer with Sanchez. There's a good chance we pick a QB in the first round in April. That likely wouldn't be happening if we had picked Sanchez in 2009.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9046119)

Please re-read what I have been saying.

I'm saying that in the long run, Cassel was better for us than Sanchez. Cassel is gone at the end of this year. Who knows how long we'd have to suffer with Sanchez. There's a good chance we pick a QB in the first round in April. That likely wouldn't be happening if we had picked Sanchez in 2009.