The Joeckeling of SNR
 

It's happening, bitches.

For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games.

If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR.

If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun.

(This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.)

I am sleepwalking through this one, folks.

I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.

What are we using to determine responsibility? PFF?

Hmm. I would say it depends where he goes. If it's here - Alex Smith is a sack-taking machine. Joeckel definitely got a lot of help from Manziel though.

That's the only service either of us could think of that reliably records that statistic.

PFF is a good use for this with Alex Smith as our QB. He will get responsibility for some sacks.

nice title

How many left tackles topped 7 sacks allowed in 2012?

Is that a stat you have quick access to?

So if Joeckel is responsible for more than 7 sacks in 14 games you are SNR bitch. And if he doesn't allow 7 sacks SNR is your bitch. Got it.


I think Direckshun is going be SNR BITCH.

Oh man this is gonna be good.

Only six.

3 more allowed 7.

Ill take sacks over INTs. Hopefully somehow he can manage to not get sacked so frequently

LMAO

Oh, SNR.

You've allowed your misdirected hostility at Luke ****ing Joeckel, who hasn't done anything other than be a stud prospect, to shoot yourself in the foot.

And I've won yet another bet.

SNR Likes star trek, right? It would be funny to make him quote the Ferengi rules of acquisition in every post.

I will take scoring drives over punts any day.

He isnt a stud prospect. Or KC would not be trying to move down in the draft.