ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2012 Dexter McCluster touches thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262599)

Reerun_KC 08-19-2012 10:53 PM

2012 Dexter McCluster touches thread
 
I was going to wait until week one for this beatdown. After last years win over child raping GoFraud, I thought we should have another thread to keep track.

So this year Dexter will have 50 touches at a min. And will say as high as 80. Let the fun begin. Will update weekly. Preseason updates coming soon. (Preseason touches do not count, have to add this for the mentally challenged people here)

2012 touch total
35 touches
15 left for the clownsuit again
* Needs to average 1.875 touches a game

Week 1 Atlanta
6 for 82

Week 2 Buffalo
4 for 32

Week 3 New Orleans
4 for 33

Week 4 San Diego
2 for 6

Week 5 Baltimore
0 for 0

Week 6 Tampa Bay
6 for 39

Week 7
Bye

Week 8 Oakland
8 for 69 1 TD

Week 9 San Diego
6 for 34

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 10:57 PM

If he remains as the #4 WR, he tops out at 40 touches. This accounts for bullshit reverses he'll run.

He could be exposed as a terrible #3 WR if someone is hurt.

Direckshun 08-19-2012 10:58 PM

o great

i was hoping wed do this for another year

Reerun_KC 08-19-2012 11:01 PM

3 touches a game puts him at 48 for the season. Strange he is on the pace in the preseason in limited playing time.

I could be under estimating his role in this offense.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 11:02 PM

I'm guessing there will be games, considering our QB, where Bowe has 2 catches for 25 yards and McCluster has 5 for 30.

This is the kind of QB he is.

okcchief 08-19-2012 11:38 PM

You are probably losing this one GC.

Hammock Parties 08-19-2012 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 8834489)
You are probably losing this one GC.

There's nothing to lose. No bet this year.

But suggesting a #4 WR has 40 touches, max, is not exactly going out on a limb.

Traditionally the #4 WR is a 20-25 catch guy.

More in a more wide open offense.

Reerun_KC 08-19-2012 11:45 PM

There isn't a bet. You have to have honor and self respect when betting. That leaves the fraud out. So just a thread to keep updated.

Ming the Merciless 08-19-2012 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8834377)
o great

i was hoping wed do this for another year

HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHA



AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA

I dunno why i am laughing so hard


I guess I am drunk

but






HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA


I love you guys

BossChief 08-20-2012 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8834494)
There's nothing to lose. No bet this year.

But suggesting a #4 WR has 40 touches, max, is not exactly going out on a limb.

Traditionally the #4 WR is a 20-25 catch guy.

More in a more wide open offense.

no bet, but you are gonna buy me a jersey if Dexter gains 600 yards.

A real, authentic one.

Not a bet, though.

BossChief 08-20-2012 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8834502)
There isn't a bet. You have to have honor and self respect when betting. That leaves the fraud out. So just a thread to keep updated.

Dude, he kept his sig and avatar for the entirety of his bets that Ive seen the last couple years.

Including when he lost our Dexter McCluster bet from last year.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-20-2012 05:27 PM

Sweet thread brah. Love it.

Canofbier 08-20-2012 05:28 PM

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-U5jWNIOgdk...use+creepy.jpg

O.city 08-20-2012 05:31 PM

Bowe is now back. He's on a contract year, and he better be calling for atleast 8 balls per game coming his way.


If Dex gets 40 catches I'll be estatic.

MahiMike 08-20-2012 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8834370)
If he remains as the #4 WR, he tops out at 40 touches. This accounts for bullshit reverses he'll run.

He could be exposed as a terrible #3 WR if someone is hurt.

Baiting you is just too easy...:shake:

QuikSsurfer 08-20-2012 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8834571)
Dude, he kept his sig and avatar for the entirety of his bets that Ive seen the last couple years.

Including when he lost our Dexter McCluster bet from last year.

He didn't keep the avatar because who ever made the bet was too ****ing lazy (stupid) to make one for him in the first place.

Munson 08-20-2012 06:49 PM

He might get 50 touches if you include kickoff and punt returns. I'm sure Crennel will give him some action on special teams sooner or later.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2012 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munson (Post 8836567)
He might get 50 touches if you include kickoff and punt returns. I'm sure Crennel will give him some action on special teams sooner or later.

LMAO

In what league, the UFL?

Dexter is not a kick returner anymore.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2012 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSsurfer (Post 8836555)
He didn't keep the avatar because who ever made the bet was too ****ing lazy (stupid) to make one for him in the first place.

BossChief told me I could remove it. It was his avatar. The Stanzi BS.

jd1020 08-20-2012 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8836582)
LMAO

In what league, the UFL?

Dexter is not a kick returner anymore.

I can see Dexter still getting touches as a kick returner because I can see Wylie on the inactive list.

RealSNR 08-20-2012 07:20 PM

And people think I have a Copper obsession...

Reerun_KC 08-24-2012 09:35 PM

Updated

BossChief 08-24-2012 09:49 PM

Here is the original bet length terms...
Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 7987412)
then its an easy bet for you to win.

sig bet from the time the season ends FOR US till the draft? Or do you have that tied up elsewhere?

He kept that Stanzi avatar on the whole time...he even left it up a couple days after the draft because he said he didn't mind it.
Quote:

Originally Posted by QuikSsurfer (Post 8836555)
He didn't keep the avatar because who ever made the bet was too ****ing lazy (stupid) to make one for him in the first place.

Either know the details or STFU
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8836583)
BossChief told me I could remove it. It was his avatar. The Stanzi BS.

I told you that you could remove it after the draft.

Reerun_KC 08-27-2012 07:55 AM

He keeps this up he would be on pace for 69 touches in the regular season..

Meltdown by the clowns for sure.

Reerun_KC 08-27-2012 07:56 AM

LOL BossChief. He created a mult the same night and started posting. That is why he is never taken seriously here... Other than his illegal copywrited crap he posts.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-27-2012 07:59 AM

Looks like he's the primary slot guy even with Bowe-Baldwin-Breaston in the lineup. Raping 3rd corners all season long coming to a TV screen near you.

milkman 08-27-2012 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8856355)
LOL BossChief. He created a mult the same night and started posting. That is why he is never taken seriously here... Other than his illegal copywrited crap he posts.

DaFace has already dismissed the rumor that Claythan is posting as mult as bullshit.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:21 AM

Either a strange coincidence or someone was trying to "frame" him.

htismaqe 08-28-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8856418)
DaFace has already dismissed the rumor that Claythan is posting as mult as bullshit.

This time. :)

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 10:25 AM

Eh, enjoy the peace while it lasts....

When he comes back he will be like a baby with a soiled diaper... Crying about something non stop.

RealSNR 08-28-2012 10:28 AM

I'd rather talk about something more important than McCluster's touches

Like why the Chiefs chose to cut Matt Szymanski.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:29 AM

Why wouldn't we talk about the guy who's had every play with the 1st team in the slot? Guess we could chat about covering special teams instead.

RealSNR 08-28-2012 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8859115)
Why wouldn't we talk about the guy who's had every play with the 1st team in the slot? Guess we could chat about covering special teams instead.

That's a bit overkill. I wanted to bring something closer to the level of the conversation. Thus, Matt Szymanski, the best back up kicker for the Chiefs I've seen since Lawrence Tynes backed up Morten Andersen.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:35 AM

Full game of work pace after 3 games: 26 Rec 258 Yards

Full season pace: 138 Rec 1376 Yards


:eek:

RealSNR 08-28-2012 10:39 AM

So why do you guys think the Chiefs cut Matt Szymanski so early? They barely even gave him a chance. From what I could see his kickoffs were pretty damn impressive in the preseason.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8856352)
He keeps this up he would be on pace for 69 touches in the regular season..

Meltdown by the clowns for sure.

Well more than that as he's only playing a half or less :)

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8859136)
Full game of work pace after 3 games: 26 Rec 258 Yards

Full season pace: 138 Rec 1376 Yards


:eek:

That would be insane...

Not gonna happen. Take half of that and its a huge success for this offense.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8859148)
So why do you guys think the Chiefs cut Matt Szymanski so early? They barely even gave him a chance. From what I could see his kickoffs were pretty damn impressive in the preseason.

cut by midgets

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8859152)
Well more than that as he's only playing a half or less :)

True.

Didnt take that into consideration. Good Call.

Chiefnj2 08-28-2012 10:42 AM

Dex has been the only WR to show up in preseason games. I don't get the mass hate for the guy that emanates from this board.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8859155)
That would be insane...

Not gonna happen. Take half of that and its a huge success for this offense.

Definately. Either way, looks like he'll be a key cog in the offense for the 2012 season and cause major amounts of butthurt with each reception and YAC he gets.

beach tribe 08-28-2012 10:45 AM

I made a sig bet with Clay a cpl months ago.
Said Dex would have 40+ catches. If he gets 40 I have his sig for 6months, If he gets 50 I have it for a year. If he gets under 20 he has mine for a year. And that kicks in AFTER he gets his sig back after he loses his 300 touches for Charles bet. He's not gonna have his sig or Av for a LOOOOOONG time. What an idiot.

Micjones 08-28-2012 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8859162)
Dex has been the only WR to show up in preseason games. I don't get the mass hate for the guy that emanates from this board.

Shut your whore mouth!
Don't you dare compliment that dreadlocked dwarf!

RealSNR 08-28-2012 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8859162)
Dex has been the only WR to show up in preseason games. I don't get the mass hate for the guy that emanates from this board.

He unprecedentedly learned some powerful ins and outs of the slot WR position. His routes are crisp, and he's doing a good job consistently getting open underneath to serve as Cassel's safety binky.

Props to the guy. I did not expect his re-transition back to WR to go this smoothly. It took Dante Hall far longer to become the WR that he was.

However, he still sucks ass at making people miss, and it's not like he's the speediest ****er in the NFL. The whole "give him the ball in space!" mantra is still reeruned as ****. But that's not a fault of Dexter; it's more a criticism of some football fans and the coaching staff. I like what he's been doing this offseason. Proved me wrong about being an effective guy who can get open. He's an asset to the offense.

bevischief 08-28-2012 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8859157)
cut by midgets

wearing pink chaps

rico 08-28-2012 11:10 AM

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...33981753_n.jpg

King_Chief_Fan 08-28-2012 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8834358)
I was going to wait until week one for this beatdown. After last years win over child raping GoFraud, I thought we should have another thread to keep track.

So this year Dexter will have 50 touches at a min. And will say as high as 80. Let the fun begin. Will update weekly. Preseason updates coming soon. (Preseason touches do not count, have to add this for the mentally challenged people here)

Pre-Arizona
Receiving 3-45

Pre-St. Louis
Receiving 3-23

Pre-Seattle
7-61 1TD

4-5 touches per game? sounds right

King_Chief_Fan 08-28-2012 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8859176)
I made a sig bet with Clay a cpl months ago.
Said Dex would have 40+ catches. If he gets 40 I have his sig for 6months, If he gets 50 I have it for a year. If he gets under 20 he has mine for a year. And that kicks in AFTER he gets his sig back after he loses his 300 touches for Charles bet. He's not gonna have his sig or Av for a LOOOOOONG time. What an idiot.

Clay the welcher?..you best examine your bet very closely, he always finds a way to squirm free/welch.

milkman 08-28-2012 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8859196)
He unprecedentedly learned some powerful ins and outs of the slot WR position. His routes are crisp, and he's doing a good job consistently getting open underneath to serve as Cassel's safety binky.

Props to the guy. I did not expect his re-transition back to WR to go this smoothly. It took Dante Hall far longer to become the WR that he was.

However, he still sucks ass at making people miss, and it's not like he's the speediest ****er in the NFL. The whole "give him the ball in space!" mantra is still reeruned as ****. But that's not a fault of Dexter; it's more a criticism of some football fans and the coaching staff. I like what he's been doing this offseason. Proved me wrong about being an effective guy who can get open. He's an asset to the offense.

That's it in a nutshell.

Weve been hearing for three years now that he's playmaker, and that simply is not true.

Chiefnj2 08-28-2012 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8859251)
That's it in a nutshell.

Weve been hearing for three years now that he's playmaker, and that simply is not true.

Suck it up and admit you were wrong about Dex.

milkman 08-28-2012 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8859256)
Suck it up and admit you were wrong about Dex.

I said that Dexter is neither excetionally fast, nor elusive.

He's not a playmaker.

Has he proven those statements to be false?

If you say anything other than no, then you are a lying bitch.

So, no I have not been wrong about Dexter McCluster.

Art Vader 08-28-2012 11:57 AM

http://i49.tinypic.com/zl7omb.png

Micjones 08-28-2012 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8859279)
I said that Dexter is neither excetionally fast, nor elusive.

He's not a playmaker.

Has he proven those statements to be false?

If you say anything other than no, then you are a lying bitch.

So, no I have not been wrong about Dexter McCluster.

The real question should be, can he be productive?
Not every player at an offensive skill position is exceptionally fast and/or elusive.

milkman 08-28-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8859372)
The real question should be, can he be productive?
Not every player at an offensive skill position is exceptionally fast and/or elusive.

And I never said that he can't be productive.

My arguments have always been against the people that have labeled him a playmaker.

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 12:37 PM

Will be fun to see how this thread stacks up over the year.

Micjones 08-28-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8859393)
And I never said that he can't be productive.

My arguments have always been against the people that have labeled him a playmaker.

I'm hearing different things.
On the one hand you suggest that he's neither fast or elusive.
On the other you say he's not a playmaker.

You've condeded that he can be productive though.

From my vantage point... Derrick Johnson is a playmaker. Jovan Belcher is productive.

You're simply saying he's no Derrick Johnson, yes?
If he can be Jovan Belcher, would you be satisfied?
(Not being a smartass here. Those are two honest questions.)

Chiefnj2 08-28-2012 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8859393)
And I never said that he can't be productive.

My arguments have always been against the people that have labeled him a playmaker.

Was he a "playmaker" against Seattle?

beach tribe 08-28-2012 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8859372)
The real question should be, can he be productive?
Not every player at an offensive skill position is exceptionally fast and/or elusive.

This is all I ever said. I believe that he can and will produce, and that he has a role on this team.
Also that he's not as bad people act like he is. If he had been taken later in the draft people would not have such a negative view of him.

Micjones 08-28-2012 01:34 PM

I think we should define the term "playmaker".
Does that mean 'can make plays' or 'consistently makes plays'?

Micjones 08-28-2012 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8859682)
This is all I ever said. I believe that he can and will produce, and that he has a role on this team.

At this point that's getting tougher and tougher for his detractors to deny.

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8859664)
Was he a "playmaker" against Seattle?

no they were all routine catches, nothing to discuss or see here.

Rasputin 08-28-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8859393)
And I never said that he can't be productive.

My arguments have always been against the people that have labeled him a playmaker.

Well I'm going keep calling him a "playmaker" as long as he is getting us first downs and touchdowns by making plays.

I expect our other WRs to have more production than Dex but that doesn't disqualify Dex from being a playmaker and an asset to this team. I also saw him doing some blocks and making extra effort in that aspect down field. FWIW that's something to be recognized.

CoMoChief 08-28-2012 01:40 PM

DMC will get around 6-7 catches a game simply because Cassel will check down often.

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 8859702)
DMC will get around 6-7 catches a game simply because Cassel will check down often.

So?

Micjones 08-28-2012 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8859708)
So?

That's supposed to be McCluster's fault. Shhh...

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8859714)
That's supposed to be McCluster's fault. Shhh...

:cuss: Sorry

jspchief 08-28-2012 01:54 PM

I've come around a little bit on McLackluster. His hands really impress me, he seems to catch everything. I also think he's a tough sonuvabitch.

The biggest problem so far has been how he's been used. Obviously they never intended him to carry the RB load that he was forced into last year. But more importantly it showed that he isn't particularly good at making people miss. I think the FO thought they were getting a Josh Cribbs, Devon Hester type of guy. A guy that you just had to find ways to get the ball in his hands. It's clear he doesn't fit that role.

So here we are left with the one thing he does well. Receiving. How long before defenses start thinking of him as a receiver? Probably not long. How long before defenses realize that Cassel only throws short? That book is written. How long before Dex gets blown up on a poorly thrown crossing pattern? Hope he likes smores, because LBs and safeties are gonna be camping in his receiving window. Besides that, his size makes him a smaller target for the QB, and Cassel needs the biggest targets he can get.

I think Dex very well could be a big part of the offense in the early part of the season. I don't expect it to last.

CoMoChief 08-28-2012 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8859708)
So?

Just saying what will probably happen....not saying it's a good or bad thing.

If anything it's Cassel's fault for not throwing downfield more often, esp when he has 2 HUGE WR's.

Micjones 08-28-2012 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 8859746)
I've come around a little bit on McLackluster. His hands really impress me, he seems to catch everything. I also think he's a tough sonuvabitch.

The biggest problem so far has been how he's been used. Obviously they never intended him to carry the RB load that he was forced into last year. But more importantly it showed that he isn't particularly good at making people miss. I think the FO thought they were getting a Josh Cribbs, Devon Hester type of guy. A guy that you just had to find ways to get the ball in his hands. It's clear he doesn't fit that role.

So here we are left with the one thing he does well. Receiving. How long before defenses start thinking of him as a receiver? Probably not long. How long before defenses realize that Cassel only throws short? That book is written. How long before Dex gets blown up on a poorly thrown crossing pattern? Hope he likes smores, because LBs and safeties are gonna be camping in his receiving window. Besides that, his size makes him a smaller target for the QB, and Cassel needs the biggest targets he can get.

I think Dex very well could be a big part of the offense in the early part of the season. I don't expect it to last.

Which just means defenses will have to play honest.
That'll create an opportunity for someone else.

Chiefnj2 08-28-2012 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 8859761)
If anything it's Cassel's fault for not throwing downfield more often, esp when he has 2 HUGE WR's.

1. He can't.
2. Bowe just returned.
3. Baldwin hasn't proven the ability to get open or catch the ball consistently.

beach tribe 08-28-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8859685)
At this point that's getting tougher and tougher for his detractors to deny.

I had to just shake my head at all the people who actually thought the guy was going to get cut..seriously.

jspchief 08-28-2012 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8859839)
Which just means defenses will have to play honest.
That'll create an opportunity for someone else.

I agree. It should help open up our outside receivers.

Micjones 08-28-2012 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8859857)
I had to just shake my head at all the people who actually thought the guy was going to get cut..seriously.

I said this all off-season.
People were CONVINCED Devon Wylie was not only going to take his job, but push him off the team. He has 1 catch in three games. I'm not sure he's asserted himself as anything more than a punt return guy. And I have nothing against the kid. I hope he makes the team and helps improve our return game.

beach tribe 08-28-2012 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 8859868)
I agree. It should help open up our outside receivers.

yup

themanwithnoname 08-28-2012 02:44 PM

I like McCluster but he was a poor pick where he was drafted. He's another one of those barometer players where if he's a major part of your offense then your offense probably isn't great.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8859857)
I had to just shake my head at all the people who actually thought the guy was going to get cut..seriously.

Yeah I couldn't believe people actually thought that. Even if Wylie and Gray panned out right away, McCluster wasn't going to be cut.

I think I might very much wish he had been after this season as he's making Cassel look improved which I don't think he really has in any meaningful way.

beach tribe 08-28-2012 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themanwithnoname (Post 8859912)
I like McCluster but he was a poor pick where he was drafted. He's another one of those barometer players where if he's a major part of your offense then your offense probably isn't great.



Yeah I couldn't believe people actually thought that. Even if Wylie and Gray panned out right away, McCluster wasn't going to be cut.

I think I might very much wish he had been after this season as he's making Cassel look improved which I don't think he really has in any meaningful way.

Yeah, god forbid a guy play well. I sure hope Bowe, Breaston and Baldwin stink up the joint too.

Black Bob 08-28-2012 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8859857)
I had to just shake my head at all the people who actually thought the guy was going to get cut..seriously.

It's pretty funny. A guy like Stanzi is far more likely to get cut and people can't fathom that.

CoMoChief 08-28-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8859930)
It's pretty funny. A guy like Stanzi is far more likely to get cut and people can't fathom that.

This place is begging for someone else to be the starting QB that they're willing to try anything/anyone at the position whether they're capable or not. When a 3rd stringer in a preseason game makes a couple of passes, everyone here starts jizzing in their pants and immediately want him to be the starter.


Cassel is the best option we have at QB by a LARGE margin. It sucks...and it sucks more that Pioli refuses to "really" address the issue...but it is what it is.

Will Cassel lead this team to a SB? Highly doubtful though it can be done, but it has to be done despite of him, meaning the defense and the running game will have to carry this team, because the passing game will not. And it sucks because this leauge is a passing/QB league.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-28-2012 03:00 PM

Get the calculators out. The little man will have folks deducting YAC yardage all season long!!

Reerun_KC 08-28-2012 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8859953)
Get the calculators out. The little man will have folks deducting YAC yardage all season long!!

YAC are meaningless yards... Its how far the ball travels in the air... You know better than this...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.