Have a lozenge?

I doubt it'll be similar to what it is with Geno. Louisville's playing absolutely nobody next year. Ohio, Eastern Kentucky, Kentucky, FIU, Houston, Temple, Cincinnati, UConn, South Florida, Central Florida, Memphis and Rutgers. He should have a mammoth season against that line-up and they shouldn't lose many (or any) games.

As far as Geno goes, several of us were talking about him in the 2012 draft thread as a name to watch for 2013. I know I expected him to have huge numbers against Big XII defenses, and as it turns out he did. I thought they'd compete for the league, but I underestimated just how bad WVU's defense was going to be. Not that I expected it to be good. Just good enough to stay on top in shootouts.

They eek out those two 1-point losses and he's on a 9-win team, likely on the stage for the Heisman ceremony and less of a perceived reach in the early first.

Also my love for Teddy is not a knock on Geno. They are both from when I grew up. We just need good pass rushing to move to our new coaches defense, and if we don't get it this year than we better be getting Clowney next year.

And I really think that this class is getting a bad rep for no good reason. I think Geno, Wilson and Barkley will be good starters for years. Hell I think Glennon will be a so-so guy as well.

I think Dysert has the chance to be a decent Kirk Cousins like guy as well.

Here is the stat that has be concerned the most about Geno and Wilson.
http://nugap.files.wordpress.com/201...if?w=386&h=106

Taking snaps under center. The NFL while envolving still you need to take snaps under center and perform while doing it.

Of course all 4 of them will be top 10 picks IMO.

Good lord, Wilson gets more excuses around here than anyone I've ever seen.


It's almost comical your hate for Geno at this point.

Question. Does Geno have elite accuracy in your eyes?

Geno threw into double coverage more than the other quarterbacks by almost triple and still only ended with 6 picks.

That's sick accuracy and trust in your receivers.

Think about that.

Actually, nevermind RunKC. I don't really know why I attacked you like that.


I don't have a dog in this race anymore.

If I had Bailey and Austin, I would trust them with my first born.

Also from the guy himself who made these stats;

" I looked at 8 games

I picked games that would average out to their season numbers to get a solid sample size."

So really none of these stats could mean much of anything. He claims to have done it based on games that when averaged would be close to their season averages, but there is more to consider. Such as who they were playing and what type of defense that team plays.

Very good but not elite IMO. I think the system at WVU helps with that a lot via screens and short/intermediate passes. Barkley threw a lot of short passes too from what I saw.

Not sold on his deep ball accuracy.

Hopefully if we draft Barkley, the NFL lets us deflate balls so he can achieve that great downfield accuracy.

To get back into the topic of this thread, I just don't see anything in Glennon. Erratic, inaccurate, really none of the qualities I'm looking for in a QB aside from arm strength.

If you left out the first sentence I would assume you were talking about our QB.

So, the whole report is basically worthless.

So he throws into 3 coverage and double coverage more than any of the others and at a higher rate, yet he completes a higher percentage in doing so, but he doesn't have elite accuracy? Got it.


Like I said, hope we don't draft him. He doesn't deserve it.