Quote:
This was a nice, entertaining and well-written prediction that perfectly captured the frustration of long-suffering Chiefs fans. The problem is that it turned out to be wrong. You predicted a continuous cycle of 7-10 wins. That's already been smashed to smithereens with 3 weeks to go. You've been an excellent poster ever since you joined this site. I especially like your takes on the Royals. But DJ's Left Nut is kicking your ass in this thread. |
Quote:
Their first move, was the same as Pioli's, trade a second(s) for an experienced guy that can get you back to competitive now. If they had a mindset to take a chance on a QB, they would have. I would bet a high that as long as the Hunt's own this team, they will not spend a 1st on a QB in my lifetime. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yep DJ's left nut should be President of CP :thumb: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The step-by-step process I copied over from another thread was posted in April or May, when even the most optimistic Chiefs fans were saying 10-11 wins. I could have just as easily said 13 (since that's been the high end of wins since the whole cycle started under Marty), but 7-10 have been the most common records in that time period, so I went with that. Also: Just checked your join date. Were you on here under a different handle before 2010? I've been around since 2001. |
Alex Smith still can't convert 1st and 10 on the opponents 19 and against a weak defense at home into a game tying score. He only give you a competitive advantage if he allows you to have more talent in other positions.
|
That's exactly why you don't go overboard to sign him. If he's looking for a Flacco contract, you walk. The Chiefs shouldn't move heaven and Earth for him, they just need to offer him a fair deal for an average to slightly above average QB. The deal needs to be one that allows them to keep the parts that are necessary for him to win the 10-12 games/season he's capable of winning with a solid defense.
If you can stick with a game manager salary for him, I believe you do get a competitive advantage. Obviously it would be better to snag someone like Wilson in the 3rd and get a Pro Bowl QB for free for a few years, but let's wait until we have one of those first. As much as we think we see, the coaches see more. If we got a guy like Wilson, I'm completely confident that Reid would see that on the practice field and wouldn't hesitate to give the kid the keys (he's done it before). And no, we didn't manage to tie that game, but in the alternative you can say that he took a team against a $25 million quarterback that just threw 5 touchdowns and had them 3 yards away from overtime. That's pretty damn impressive in its own right, is it not? I just think it's both unfair and unreasonable to say "if he's not Manning, don't extend him." He's not Manning - he'll never be Manning. But if your choice is Alex Smith at $10-$12 million/season or Eli Manning, Joe Flacco or Tony Romo at twice that, you're going to be a better football team on the aggregate with Alex Smith. In that sense, he absolutely provides a competitive advantage. |
Yes. But don't rush.
Just one Sunday of watching QB's around the league will tell you all you need to know about how hard it is to find consistent play from your QB. QB play has been atrocious for a lot of NFL teams this year and we all know it is the most important position on the field. Smith has played with competence and consistency. He has shown flashes of more than that on more than a handful of occasions...And make no mistake, other than Charles and an inconsistent Bowe, this offense lacks fire power. Smith has done what most here said he needed to do...Make KC competitive immediately...and he has done that. Do you sign him to crazy money? No. Do you extend him for the next five years? No. Do you push him out the door after next year with only an undrafted QB worth a shit behind him? Absolutely not. |
Just because Alex has had about 5 or 6 good games out of 13 so far, doesn't mean you extend him, nope.
|
Quote:
The offense has shown improvement corresponding with the improvement of our Oline. The redzone depends even more on the TE and ours are weak. Our offense is pretty dam good when our WRs catch the ball and our Oline doesn't commit penalties. Both are not on the QB. People used to say Alex Smith couldn't throw it deep as well and now he is doing it just fine. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Before that, I worked in an extremely IT-controlled environment that locked sites such as this one away. (Such is life at huge corporate entities, though). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.