Here's what I would do in the 1st:
 

Scenario A:

#5- Chris Long (if available)

#17- I would target Otah (Albert and Clady will surely be gone by then). If Otah is gone, I would try to trade down and keep trading down (ala Jerry Jones) for additional picks. Then I would get Sam Baker or Carl Nicks at the position of worth.


Scenario B: (Chris Long, gone before 5)

#5- I would try to trade down a few spots for additional picks to where I could get either Clady or Albert without it being a reach.

#17- Hopefully Derrick Harvey (or maybe Calais Campbell)



Feedbacks please.

Perhaps if we trade down enough times we could wrap up the entire 7th round!!! What a coup that would be!!

Is everyone aware that Otah's feet are encased in concrete shoes?

"And in the 7th round Kansas City picks....everyone that's left."

Feedback: Horrid.

I never could have guessed that you'd be looking for a way, any way possible, to pick an offensive tackle, no matter how shitty they are.

Well said.

We need a DT that can collapse the pocket. Sedrick Ellis or Dorsey. No need to trade down at #5. Someone will be there that we can use, whether it's Ellis, Dorsey, Long or Gholston.

I think you are spending entirely to much energy worrying over one position on a god awgul, suckass football team.

Ah,... Comedy!

If you are dumb enough to read Frankies takes in the DC forum you're able to understand how he can be so wrong at the draft.

This begs the question.

What's that say about you?

Wheeling and dealing like that served Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson as I recal. Some of you think a trade down is only for the sake of a trade and not for a plan for improvement. Those of you who think that way think this idea is horried.

Hey! Quit stealing my material!

The idea of trading down isn't horrid, in and of itself.

It's the whole idea of trading down to target a player at a specific position.