Broncos traded Kaepernick
Sorta:
On April 29, 2011, The San Francisco 49ers traded up with the Denver Broncos from the thirteenth pick in the second round (#45 overall) to select Colin Kaepernick as the fourth pick in the second round (#36 overall) at the 2011 NFL Draft. The Denver Broncos received picks 45, 108 and 141 overall in exchange for the 36th overall pick. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Kaepernick ROFL |
Nice find Bro
|
This makes me warm inside
|
Quote:
|
Keapernick > Rahim Moore (45), Quintin Carter (108), Julius Thomas (141 - traded to move up to 129 to take Thomas).
Funny that the guy the Broncos got was responsible for the poor coverage on the final tying bomb pass from Flacco...lol |
No way would I want to see Kaepernick in Denver.
2 years of Manning > 15 years of Kapernick. For Chiefs fans anyway. |
No, they didn't. What a dumb ****ing thread
|
ya, Kaepernick is pretty damn awesome.
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_NFL_Draft |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's not dumb, it's not opinion. It's fact. The broncos traded that pic and you said they didn't. You are ****ing idiotic dude. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ha! I didn't notice that. Makes it all the more awesome! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shouldn't you be paying more attention to that and less attention to neg-repping rational people on the internet? |
Quote:
you're pathetic. |
Broncos traded the pick used to acquire Kaepernick. Not really that complicated, and I think everyone knew what the OP intended.
|
Quote:
Yeah, cuz it makes no sense. |
Quote:
|
Keapernick looked like a lightning bolt running yesterday. He had plenty of gas late in the game. Pretty impressive to me.......
|
Quote:
What's so odd about Denver trading out of that slot was: they had no QB. They had Orton, Quinn, Tebow who all sucked. It's one thing to trade out and miss on a young QB when you already signed Peyton in March, like they did this year. But this happened a year before the Peyton signing. Either way, they ended up (1) Burning a 1st on Tebow, (2) passing on Kap, (3) getting Rahim "Toast" Moore instead, (4) spending 90M on Peyton, (5) Losing first round anyway |
Delicious Tears!!!!
Keep them coming Donk fan!!!! |
Quote:
|
I'd like to see the data on likelihood of major injury rushing, or getting sacked. Tom Brady had his leg destroyed by Pollard while throwing a bomb. Where are you truly "safe" in the NFL?
|
Quote:
|
Chiefs drafted Jon Baldwin over Kaepernick
think about that for a second |
Quote:
You looking to send someone on a killing spree? |
I HAD KAEPERNICK ON MY DRAFT WISH LIST!!!
But effing Piolli took Jonathan Baldwin ahead of him. :( How bad was Piolli's hatred of Bowe? |
Quote:
|
That is just perfect.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kaepernick want taken in our spot. Posted via Mobile Device |
How bout that Kaeper-keeper?!
Alright I need to go walk that one off |
Quote:
This is a case where it's technically true, but the Broncos didn't trade the pick with the intention of giving up the player. That's why I think it was a poor thread. Like my earlier example showed, did the panthers trade darelle revis, or did they trade the pick with the intention of getting more picks? |
By that logic, you're effectively trading away any single player you don't choose while acquiring the one you do with your given pick.
Eh, **** it. Agree to disagree |
Interesting. I just posted in another thread laughing about how Denver overspent for a 2 year old man when they could have had Russell Wilson too. So glad Pioli pissed off Peyton...
|
When you see him on interviews, Kaepernick reminds of me one of those little kids with that aging disease. He always wears a hat that's too big, and then he has kind of a big nose and close-set eyes. I think he's really five years old and everyone just assumes that he's NFL-eligible.
|
Quote:
|
Using a pick that high (no. 36) for a quarterback is risky and reckless, especially when you trade for that pick. It's much safer to use high picks for offensive line depth.
Regards, Scott DickHeadedPrickBalls |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"End result" has nothing to do with PM. The "end result" is passing on Kaep for Baldwin (in our case), and trading the pick where Kaep was taken(in denver's case). Thus, not having Kaepernick is the end result.
Do I really have to spoon feed you the point in order for you to understand it? |
Nice
|
Quote:
They didn't trade to our pick to get kaepernick Posted via Mobile Device |
Can one of you ****ers post this at the Mane?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Meh....I just can't see him surviving next year as a starter. I'd be surprised if he was still a starter in 2015. Call it the injury risk and lack of proof that he can be good at the job that matters...throwing the ball. TeBow was worlds more accomplished in college and he might not even be on a team next year.
|
Quote:
Kaepernick is not mechanically flawed, and he has a good coach to teach him the nuances of the QB position. |
Quote:
And the tebow thing... really? Kaepernick flops his nuts on tebow's face. Not even close to an accurate comparison. |
Quote:
His best statistical game in the NFL against a quality opponent was against CHI, but even then it doesn't really stand out. Quality but not exceptional. For the college comparison consider him V Tebow. No doubt he's an exceptional runner that plays QB. But one of the gold standards to ultimately successful QBs is how many seasons they complete > 60% passing. All 4 is usually a solid indicator for success in the NFL. Kaepernick only finished his final season at > 60% passing and he played against distinctly lessor competition(but also with lessor talent on his team too). His only season where he looks like a legit QB is his last one and that used to be a red flag for future NFL productivity. Tebow had 4 seasons of solid production, 60+% passing etc against the best in the country, and look where he is in the NFL today? Hey who knows intangibles can be everything and never underestimate the ability to lead your team. Maybe he can pass or at least learn to, we'll see, but if he keeps running alot he's eventually going to leave this game on a stretcher. Vick avoided that rule for a long time(he's the fastest QB the NFL has seen), but as he gold older and slower it caught up to him too. |
I will sleep a little better knowing the Donks ****ed themselves... Always a good feeling......
ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL |
Quote:
|
We might still have Pioli if we took him instead of Baldwin.
Dodged a bullet, I'd say. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.