ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   The Lounge (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Raiders poised to pursue Tom Brady (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=329081)

digger 02-06-2020 08:48 PM

Who is there back up when Brady is broken? Arrowhead SouthWest in LV...lol

staylor26 02-06-2020 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14782737)
Raiders are way better of a system for him than NE. They’ve got all the pieces but receiver for him.

Gruden loves the run first, short/quick pass offense that Brady has thrived in

Lol hyperbole much?

They have a better OL and RB. That’s it. How would Brady have looked the last 2 years on the Raiders with no defense?

wazu 02-06-2020 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14782706)
I just donít understand why all of these teams are lining up to sign a 43 year old thatís due for a HUGE drop off next year

The dropoff has already happened. He could bounce back some and still be bad.

CasselGotPeedOn 02-06-2020 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14782752)
Lol hyperbole much?

They have a better OL and RB. Thatís it.

Way better TE

staylor26 02-06-2020 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14782761)
Way better TE

Yea I did forget about him. Itís still not going to make a difference when he also has the Raiders defense and heís 43 ****ing years old.

staylor26 02-06-2020 09:00 PM

2019 Tom Brady:

4,057 yards 24 TD’s 8 INT’s

2019 Derek Carr:

4,054 yards 21 TD’s 8 INT’s



https://i.imgur.com/GqjWc6f.jpg

Superturtle 02-06-2020 09:02 PM

One of the only teams that actually make sense IF Brady decides to leave New England, and it has nothing to do with on the field.

staylor26 02-06-2020 09:03 PM

10 of Brady’s 24 TD’s last year came in the first 5 weeks.

Why Not? 02-06-2020 09:03 PM

Smart by the Raiders if true. Won’t be able to compete in the division for a decade so might as well try to get old east coasters living in Vegas to snap up season tickets.

kcclone 02-06-2020 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14782768)
2019 Tom Brady:

4,057 yards 24 TDís 8 INTís

2019 Derek Carr:

4,054 yards 21 TDís 8 INTís



https://i.imgur.com/GqjWc6f.jpg


With a way easier schedule

RunKC 02-06-2020 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14782752)
Lol hyperbole much?

They have a better OL and RB. Thatís it. How would Brady have looked the last 2 years on the Raiders with no defense?

Darren Waller is a good TE. Hunter Renfrow has 600 yards and 4 TDís as a rookie slot WR. Thatís absolutely the type of receiver Tom loves. Extremely similar to Welker and Edelman in that role.

Raiders would easily be able to snatch CeeDee Lamb, Jerry Jeudy or Henry Ruggs with the 12th pick to add a weapon.

The offense just seems perfect for him. Defense is still shit though. Canít argue that.

FringeNC 02-06-2020 09:11 PM

There's a big issue here -- after playing in the that NE offense his whole career, is he really going to want to have to learn the WCO?

jdubya 02-06-2020 09:19 PM

Funny. A declining Brady is still better than Carrs ceiling haha. Arguably the raiders have a better Oline, RB, FB, and TE`s and slot WR than Brady had last year. I think raiders fans must be done with Dalton, oops I mean Carr

This isnt tampering unless actual negotiations are going on

staylor26 02-06-2020 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 14782798)
Funny. A declining Brady is still better than Carrs ceiling haha. Arguably the raiders have a better Oline, RB, FB, and TE`s and slot WR than Brady had last year. I think raiders fans must be done with Dalton, oops I mean Carr

This isnt tampering unless actual negotiations are going on

Based on what? Their production was identical last year. Brady is now another year older. If heís better, itís by an inch.

jdubya 02-06-2020 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14782801)
Based on what? Their production was identical last year. Brady is now another year older. If heís better, itís by an inch.

Just my opinion. Pats defense was legit but their offense IMO had far fewer weapons than the raiders. Yes the raiders need a number 1 wide receiver but but they have Jacobs, Waller, Renfrow and 1 or 2 serviceable players that Brady would have been successful. Living here in the Bay Area I saw most raider games and Carr is a disaster. The king of checkdowns and plays with fear. He has the physical tools but mentally is the polar opposite of Patrick. The longer the raiders keep Carr, the better for all of us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.