ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 13 1234 5 6789 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dear, Vikings: Thanks for our quarterback; Sincerely, Chiefs (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=197822)

FringeNC 12-04-2008 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5269526)
These are the current rankings of our opponents for overall NFL defense:

Tampa Bay: 4th. This was the game where we really opened up the playbook, and had better performance from the Offense after the NYJ and two solid weeks of practicing the scheme. The Tampa D however did what a good D is supposed to do; they made adjustments at the half, and shut the Offense down in the 2nd half of the game.

Tennessee: 5th. Doesn't really count, but WTF.

New England: 9th. Again; doesn't count.

Carolina: 11th. No Count.

Buffalo: 12th. Interesting...

Miami: 18th.

New Orleans: 20th.

Atlanta: 22nd. Shits and giggles only; no count.

Cincinnati: 24th.

Oakland: 25th.

San Diego: 27th.

Denver: 28th.

If I'm wrong, and this scheme becomes the Holy of Holies; great. But until I see a 'W' against a top 10 defense, I will NOT be convinced.
And I guess it was because of the offense that we lost to Indy in 2003? You're th type of guy who would claim a pitcher sucks if he had 1.50 ERA and had a losing record because of a league-worst offense. Your argument is a joke.

El Jefe 12-04-2008 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 5269486)
You're a ****ing idiot, and can't see shit right in front of your clown face.
LMAO. This.

Reerun_KC 12-04-2008 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5269538)
And I guess it was because of the offense that we lost to Indy in 2003? You're th type of guy who would claim a pitcher sucks if he had 1.50 ERA and had a losing record because of a league-worst offense. Your argument is a joke.
Hey wait one minute FringeNC, Didnt Herm say that we are losing games because of our circus offense as well? That we needed to control the clock and TOP?

Sure-Oz 12-04-2008 12:29 PM
The vikings would be worlds better if they had thigpen starting

Hootie 12-04-2008 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5269413)
Wow. Wow wow wow.

Prior to this thread, I thought that overall we had some really good students of the game in here.

Unbelieveable.
Dude...

You're a ****ing idiot.

The offense we're running now is far better and much more effective than the offense that led us to the playoffs in 2006.

Hootie 12-04-2008 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5269424)
Although i didnt notice it last week,

Thiggy has ran a few plays from behind center. He doesnt take 100% shotgun snaps.
The Tampa Bay game he spent the majority of the first half behind center and we had three straight TD drives.

Hootie 12-04-2008 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5269433)
I can almost guarantee our spread is going to be dogshit without Tony catching 10 balls a game.
Good thing we have Tony then?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-04-2008 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5269538)
And I guess it was because of the offense that we lost to Indy in 2003? You're th type of guy who would claim a pitcher sucks if he had 1.50 ERA and had a losing record because of a league-worst offense. Your argument is a joke.
What the **** does a loss from 2003, with a completely different roster have to with this?

The argument is valid; run this Quasi-Spread against a Top 10, and SHOW ME THE ****ING WIN!!!
:cuss:

FringeNC 12-04-2008 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5269541)
Hey wait one minute FringeNC, Didnt Herm say that we are losing games because of our circus offense as well? That we needed to control the clock and TOP?
He most certainly did, and all the Herm lover's conveniently ignore that. This offense has only had success because we have scrapped Herm's power running bullshit, and started throwing the ball again.

mikey23545 12-04-2008 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5269531)
See my post above; I knew this was the "ace" everyone was going to attempt to pull.
And so ignoring it proves your point?!?!?

Gochiefs, you are such an idiot...ROFL

Sure-Oz 12-04-2008 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5269547)
Dude...

You're a ****ing idiot.

The offense we're running now is far better and much more effective than the offense that led us to the playoffs in 2006.
IF we had an average defense we wouldve won most of these games

Hootie 12-04-2008 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5269458)
I won't deny that the scheme is working well right now. But the level of play on the part of EVERYONE involved in it needs to up, up, UP Big Time in order to make it work against a Pro Bowl defense.

I'll be plowing through the numbers here shortly, as I want to see how this is truly playing out.
well it's a good thing the Chiefs aren't going to Hawaii to play that pro bowl defense any time soon

Reerun_KC 12-04-2008 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5269547)
Dude...

You're a ****ing idiot.

The offense we're running now is far better and much more effective than the offense that led us to the playoffs in 2006.
but Hootie, you were so in love with that 2006 offense with Huard at the Helm..

Divorce can be a nasty thing, if you need to talk, I will listen...

The Franchise 12-04-2008 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5269556)
IF we had an average defense we wouldve won most of these games
This.

Hootie 12-04-2008 12:34 PM
We went to the playoffs in 2006 with an offense half as effective as the one we've ran the last 6 weeks with Thigpen.

This offense has been playoff caliber lately...too bad we have NOTHING on defense.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 PM.
Page 5 of 13 1234 5 6789 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.