ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 7 1234 5 67
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Hypothetical established players for #1 pick (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268569)

jd1020 01-06-2013 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9290450)
Take it back I say!
I bet the Rams wish they could take back the trade.

ThaVirus 01-06-2013 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9290450)
Take it back I say!
Do you wish you had stayed put and taken RGIII?

Be honest.

Rams Fan 01-06-2013 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 9290459)
Do you wish you had stayed put and taken RGIII?

Be honest.
No, but if Luck were available at 2 I might reconsider. I don't think RGIII will last as long as Bradford will in the league. I also thought it was a great return and bodes well for the future as the Rams went through the worst 5 year stretch in NFL history. 1 player won't solve the entire team's issues.

Mama Hip Rockets 01-06-2013 09:22 PM
Aaron Rodgers

Mama Hip Rockets 01-06-2013 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9290287)
Luck, Manning, Manning, Rodgers, Rothlisberger, Cam, Romo, Brady, Rivers, Stafford, Cutler.
WTF????????

Strongside 01-06-2013 09:26 PM
Stay safe, Poverty Ghost.


Don't you put that evil on me, Ricky Bobby.

BossChief 01-06-2013 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9290474)
No, but if Luck were available at 2 I might reconsider. I don't think RGIII will last as long as Bradford will in the league. I also thought it was a great return and bodes well for the future as the Rams went through the worst 5 year stretch in NFL history. 1 player won't solve the entire team's issues.
You are lying to yourself. So far, Bradford looks like jag.

Sorry.

Red Dawg 01-06-2013 09:29 PM
Stay safe poverty ghost.

Red Dawg 01-06-2013 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 9290459)
Do you wish you had stayed put and taken RGIII?

Be honest.
They should have. Why they are hell bent on bradford I dont know.

jd1020 01-06-2013 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9290499)
You are lying to yourself. So far, Bradford looks like jag.

Sorry.
I remember getting laughed at for suggesting this last year.

Mama Hip Rockets 01-06-2013 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9290474)
No, but if Luck were available at 2 I might reconsider. I don't think RGIII will last as long as Bradford will in the league. I also thought it was a great return and bodes well for the future as the Rams went through the worst 5 year stretch in NFL history. 1 player won't solve the entire team's issues.
Then why were the Colts and Redskins so terrible last year and in the playoffs this year?

The Rams would have won at least 11 games with Luck or RG3 this year, IMO. Their defense is awesome.

Rams Fan 01-06-2013 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9290499)
You are lying to yourself. So far, Bradford looks like jag.

Sorry.
If a guy was sacked 30 consecutive games, went to a team that had 6 wins the 3 seasons prior to when he was drafted, went through 3 OCs in 3 season, you'd still give him a chance, wouldn't you?

jd1020 01-06-2013 09:32 PM
Bradford is like Cassel.

He isn't good but his defenders will continue to fall back on how the team around him isn't perfect.

Meanwhile, you've got 3 rookies in the playoffs this year and 1 QB in his first half year of starting in his 2nd season.

Buckweath 01-06-2013 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9290285)
I think Tony Romo is under rated by a lot of people, but I would not trade the #1 for him.

I also would not trade the #1 for Cam Newton, in spite of the fact that he might be the most physically gifted of any of those QBs, because I seriously question the mental aspect of his talent.

Outside of QB, I would not trade the #1 overal for any other position.

Great players at any other position are just cogs, outstanding cogs to be sure, but just cogs, nonetheless.

If you don't have a QB, you are wasting your time.
Best post in this thread.

You're very unlikely to ever win a SB if you don't have let's say a top 8 QB.

It's all about getting that elite QB IMO.

So I'd trade the pick only for Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Luck, Griffin, Roethlisberger ...

Rams Fan 01-06-2013 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 9290520)
Then why were the Colts and Redskins so terrible last year and in the playoffs this year?

The Rams would have won at least 11 games with Luck or RG3 this year, IMO. Their defense is awesome.
Redskins have more offensive weapons than the Rams do, Colts were beneficial of a weak ass schedule(3rd weakest in the NFL). Plus, neither went 15-65 over a 5 year stretch.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 PM.
Page 5 of 7 1234 5 67
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.