ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Orakpo - 4 sacks on the day, 12 on the year (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219893)

Mr. Laz 12-14-2009 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6345794)
Blind squirrels and nuts.
so you're saying if we poke Mecca's eyes out then he will finally get one right too?

TEX 12-14-2009 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl (Post 6345708)
Told you he was no Gholston.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...1&postcount=11

Yall think Pioli would like to go back and do that pick #3 pick over?

In comparison, Tyson Jackson is currently grading out as the worst 5 technique in the national football league:

http://profootballfocus.com/by_posit...=25&numgames=1
Exactly - I was saying it as well but most (including some who responded to this thread) said that I was impartial since I am from Texas...Well I'd just like to say ," **** YOU PIOLI!" and ,"TOLD YA SO!" to the nonbelievers. It $ucks to be correct and still lose because the Chiefs are so bad.

Chiefnj2 12-14-2009 12:28 PM
Clay Matthews would also have been a great fit in KC. KC could have traded down to mid first taken Clay and another 2 draft picks to piss away.

MMXcalibur 12-14-2009 12:36 PM
We're eternally doomed to have drafted defensive players play like shit-for-brain twats.

HemiEd 12-14-2009 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 6345973)
We're eternally doomed to have drafted defensive players play like shit-for-brain twats.
Isn't Krumrie the only common denominator?

RealSNR 12-14-2009 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6345951)
KC could have traded down to mid first
No we couldn't

smittysbar 12-14-2009 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6345951)
Clay Matthews would also have been a great fit in KC. KC could have traded down to mid first taken Clay and another 2 draft picks to piss away.
Trading down, wish it was that easy

Brock 12-14-2009 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 6345979)
No we couldn't
The Chiefs could have traded to 17 for sure.

-King- 12-14-2009 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6345987)
The Chiefs could have traded to 17 for sure.
You're being sarcastic right? From the 3rd pick to 17? You know how much the other team would have to give up for that trade to be even logical?

Brock 12-14-2009 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6346007)
You're being sarcastic right? From the 3rd pick to 17? You know how much the other team would have to give up for that trade to be even logical?
Around the same amount they gave up to move to 5. what's logic got to do with it? They drafted a 3-4 end at 3.

Chiefnj2 12-14-2009 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6346007)
You're being sarcastic right? From the 3rd pick to 17? You know how much the other team would have to give up for that trade to be even logical?
That's where things don't match up anymore. The draft value chart is outdated. The chart calls for too much compensation. Even if KC only obtained a 2nd and 3rd round pick to move down to 17, it could be an excellent trade for KC and good value provided the right picks were made.

BWillie 12-14-2009 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6345738)
Oh....and for what it's worth......if we didn't trade for Cassel....we could have ended up with this.

1st - Mark Sanchez, QB
2nd - Ron Brace, NT
3rd - Alex Magee, DE
You know, I still probably wouldn't want Sanchez over Cassel. Sanchez started out w/ three good games and he's been worse than Jamarcus Russell ever since. At least we know Cassell had a year where he was a serviceable QB for New England. We know that Sanchez sucks.

wild1 12-14-2009 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 6346061)
You know, I still probably wouldn't want Cassell over Sanchez. Sanchez started out w/ three good games and he's been worse than Jamarcus Russell ever since. At least we know Cassell had a year where he was a serviceable QB for New England. We know that Sanchez sucks.
We don't know that Sanchez will always suck any more than we know if Cassel will suck for the rest of his career.

Sanchez is sucking on a better offense, but he probably still has more upside. Cassel hasn't had a good year, but with a decent offense he played fairly well last season.

I don't think there is a clear favorite at this point in their careers between the two.

Sure-Oz 12-14-2009 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 6346061)
You know, I still probably wouldn't want Cassell over Sanchez. Sanchez started out w/ three good games and he's been worse than Jamarcus Russell ever since. At least we know Cassell had a year where he was a serviceable QB for New England. We know that Sanchez sucks.
lol, i think thats really unfair to judge Sanchez this early. 1 year college starter, starting as a rookie

Sure-Oz 12-14-2009 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6346066)
We don't know that Sanchez will always suck any more than we know if Cassel will suck for the rest of his career.

Sanchez is on a better offense, but he probably still has more upside. Cassel hasn't had a good year, but with a decent offense he played fairly well last season.

I don't think there is a clear favorite at this point in their careers between the two.
Cassel still makes the dumbest decisions, he needs to correct that first off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 PM.
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.