The original post mentions the last two games that Cassel has played.
Interesting material. Even more interesting, the one that Cassel didn't. To act as if any QB could come in and do well in this system because of the run game is ridiculous. The offense, led by Croyle, had 70 total yards. While I would never tout Cassel as MVP... when you look at the disparity between this team WITH Cassel, and this team WITHOUT Cassel..... there, in fact, may be no single player that is more important to their team. Now, one would have to have more than one game to assert that confidently. However, it certainly looks that way. |
Haven't read thread just an observation.
Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Drew Brees have no real running game. Seems you either run the ball with an average to slightly above QB or you barely run the ball and throw it all over the field anymore. |
Quote:
It just isn't argue worthy if you do! All things considered I'm already pumped for next year, no matter what happens this year I'd say we have a chance to show continuing improvement all around as a team and a franchise. Back to CHIEFS dominance in the AFC/NFL. |
Quote:
It has always been, "though an average QB could win a SB, a great one can have you in the hunt year-in and year-out." So I guess it's all about what you want for the franchise. While everyone would be ecstatic with a SB win, wouldn't it be infinitely better to have a team equipped to at least be in the SB conversation every year? Sent from my Teddy Ruxpin using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
the whole team wants to play better for cassel because they see him giving it his all.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BJGE doesn't excite anyone, but he's an Antowain Smith plowhorse who almost never loses yards, and Woody is Woody. Sure, it's not Charles and Jones, but it's adequate. But your point is valid, again. The NFL is no longer a run first league, or "run to set up the pass". But if you have NO running game, you do have problems. |
I've seen Cassel make huge strides this year from a mechanical standpoint, and he's just emrging.
To suggest he's reached his ceiling is ridiculous. It's possible that he has, but highly unlikely, because it's well documented that he puts in the work to improve. That being said, the thing that has me sold on Cassel right now is that we see a team that believes in him. That's well over half the battle. He grown into the clear leader of this team. |
Quote:
Cassel is going to be fine and barring injury just may be the QB that we need for the immediate future 2-4 years or more, IMO. |
Quote:
|
I'm not sure I've ever rooted for a KC player to fail. I know there were several posters that wished Trent Green would fail because they didn't like the trade, etc. I just can't figure out why.
I hated the Tyson Jackson pick, but I don't want to see him fail. Look at his contract? We're bitching about Cassel's? And speaking of the contract or money...who cares? Cassel didn't ask for that contract nor should he be judged on it or have to live up to it. Blame Pioli if you don't like it...Not Cassel. Right now, Cassel is playing with confidence, going through reads, showing good footwork and pocket awareness. His accuracy has improved and mistakes have reduced. ...But by all means, keep rooting against him Chiefs fans?? Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I grew to respect Green, though I never had faith that he could make plays consistently late in games. But I hated that trade for the very same reason I hated the trade for Montana. Age. I don't need to necessarily draft a QB, but I want a young QB that has the potential to lead this team for more than 6 or 7 years. I'm watching Matt Cassel grow into the position, and now believe he has the chance to be that guy for the next 6-8 years. But damn, I hope to hell that we someday find and groom a guy that can be that guy for 10-12-13 years. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.