ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Prediction for the Chiefs 2007 Offense: 32nd in passing offense, Bottom 5 in total O. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=161353)

FloridaMan88 04-16-2007 08:09 AM

Prediction for the Chiefs 2007 Offense: 32nd in passing offense, Bottom 5 in total O.
 
No Trent Green, No Will Shields, No Dante Hall, No substantial upgrades to the worst WR corp in the NFL, the worst trio of QBs in the NFL, the most conservative head coach with regards to offense in the NFL, the biggest stiff/puppet/joke of an offensive coordinator in the NFL all will equate to one of the worst offense's in franchise history and in the NFL next season.

I predict:

1) A passing offense that ranks 32nd (that is dead last in the NFL) in yards per game and total passing yards for the season.

2) A total offense that ranks in the bottom 5 in the NFL (28th, 29th, 30th, 31st, 32nd) in total yards per game and total yards for the season.

OnTheWarpath15 04-16-2007 08:12 AM

Put your money where your mouth is.

I'll bet you $100 this doesn't happen.

That's what I thought.

Brock 04-16-2007 08:17 AM

No Dante Hall, LOL. Like that means anything.

htismaqe 04-16-2007 08:20 AM

ROFL

Sully 04-16-2007 08:21 AM

Holy crap KCCHIEFS"fan"88 said something negative.

I'm shocked.

banyon 04-16-2007 08:22 AM

I think we'll be bottom 10, I don't know about bottom 5. I think the OL has a lot more to do with it than Dante Hall or Green though.

Bowser 04-16-2007 08:23 AM

So you are telling us THIS was the year that Dante was going to have 1,500+ receiving yards to go with his 16 TD's.

pikesome 04-16-2007 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88
1) A passing offense that ranks 32nd (that is dead last in the NFL) in yards per game and total passing yards for the season.

You're aware that the Raiders still field a team, right? You might want to soften the language based on that fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88
2) A total offense that ranks in the bottom 5 in the NFL (28th, 29th, 30th, 31st, 32nd) in total yards per game and total yards for the season.

We were 16th in YPG last year. Is there going to be that big of a drop off? Oakland, Cleveland, Buffalo, Houston, Tampa, Tennessee, all good candidates for bottom five.

Can we please wait for TC before the "sky is falling" crap this year?

tiptap 04-16-2007 08:36 AM

It will all depend upon how well our new QB is in faking. This offensive line will be OK for the running game. It will not be hitting the edge like Vermeil was able to do. But it should do better between the tackles. And if the offense can offer that surprise moment with good fakes to keep the defenses from stacking the line well it won't be in bottom 5. What will be more important statistic for this offense will be time of possession and points per drive. And LJ will give us the talent to make scores on his own and TG will give us the chance to keep drives going. I'm going to wait on that prediction because I didn't see that kind of performance last year and I think this line is better than last year. Not anywhere as good as two or more years ago but better than last year.

We won't be a team that can come back from a big deficit though, that is true. We will have to live with big blowouts and forget them.

Deberg_1990 04-16-2007 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
No Dante Hall, LOL. Like that means anything.

His 15 catches a year are irreplaceable

penguinz 04-16-2007 08:54 AM

No Dante is more likely to increase production than lower it.

Mr. Laz 04-16-2007 08:57 AM

imo our offense will be bottom 10 ..... our defense top 10


basically reverse the vermeil era

acesn8s 04-16-2007 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
No Dante is more likely to increase production than lower it.

How can you say that a another WR that would most likely be taller than Dante be more productive? :sarcasm:

penguinz 04-16-2007 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acesn8s
How can you say that a another WR that would most likely be taller than Dante...

Most likely be taller? My 7 month old is taller and I bet he pouts less too. :D

acesn8s 04-16-2007 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
Most likely be taller? My 7 month old is taller and I bet he pouts less too. :D

But does he drop the ball as much?:hmmm:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.