ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ***The Official Branden Albert Trade Thread*** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272490)

Frazod 04-26-2013 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9630547)
I still say keeping him and letting him play through the tag is our best option if we can't do any better than MIA's #54. I'd rather have him at LT for a year, then let him walk and get the comp pick as opposed to helping the Dolphins and taking less than he's worth. MIA basically told Dorsey **** you, we'll trade our higher 2nd and you're going to take #54 and like it.

I agree with this. Especially after they made a deal with Oakland, Miami can eat shit. Unless we can totally rape them, I say keep Albert or deal him to somebody else.

ptlyon 04-26-2013 08:28 AM

I say F Albert & make him ensure this shitty season with the rest of us.

philfree 04-26-2013 08:38 AM

I don't think anyone will give a 1st for Albert so if that's what we ask for then we're keeping Albert. I'd just as soon move on now. I've posted it more then once but Miami has two 3rd round picks. #77 and #82. #54 + either one of those picks would be fine by me. We need to get it done before the 2nd round starts though in case we want to try and trade up for a player/QB. And we'll have plenty of ammo to trade if we make that deal.

Molitoth 04-26-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9629735)
If we hadn't flushed our 2nd on Alex Smith i wouldn't want to trade him at all

Albert ---- Fisher at tackle sounds good to me

But to draft a RT @ #1 overall?

ChiTown 04-26-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9630661)
But to draft a RT @ #1 overall?

That's why I think Albert is still going to be gone. You don't draft a RT at 1.1

TexanGuy 04-26-2013 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9630661)
But to draft a RT @ #1 overall?

Well it's obvious all the Geno supporters were dead wrong and in a draft so devoid of talent, who else would you take at the top?

(Not considering a trade down since no one wanted to give up value to move up)

Messier 04-26-2013 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9630661)
But to draft a RT @ #1 overall?

Everyone keeps saying this like playing RT for a year means you drafted a RT.

All the Geno fans were on board with drafting him and sitting him for a year or so. Does that mean I could rant about how the Chiefs wasted 1.1 on a backup QB?

KChiefs1 04-26-2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9629716)
What about Detroit? They have the 4th pick tomorrow, right?

A lot of teams need a LT.

ILChief 04-26-2013 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9630676)
Everyone keeps saying this like playing RT for a year means you drafted a RT.

All the Geno fans were on board with drafting him and sitting him for a year or so. Does that mean I could rant about how the Chiefs wasted 1.1 on a backup QB?

I guess the packers drafted a backup QB when they took rodgers

Coogs 04-26-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9629716)
What about Detroit? They have the 4th pick tomorrow, right?

I think this is the option I would be checking out to see if there is any interest. Stafford has taken a beating early in his career, and I would have to think Albert would be a better fit at LT than anything available at this point in the draft.

Fat Elvis 04-26-2013 09:00 AM

Signing Albert to a long term deal means that our O-line is set for the next six years--not only set, but will probably be the best O-line in the league. With most of our pro-bowlers hitting their prime now, that is a long time to make significant runs at the Super Bowl.

Keep Albert, draft Bostic (unless by some strange stroke of luck Cyprien is still there) with the 3.a and just keep loading up year after year after year. We have the foundations for a dynasty in place--lets take advantage of it.

DTLB58 04-26-2013 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9630547)
I still say keeping him and letting him play through the tag is our best option if we can't do any better than MIA's #54. I'd rather have him at LT for a year, then let him walk and get the comp pick as opposed to helping the Dolphins and taking less than he's worth. MIA basically told Dorsey **** you, we'll trade our higher 2nd and you're going to take #54 and like it.

You are looking at it wrong. Forget the Dolphins. Do you really think the Chiefs FO thinks wether or not they wanna screw over the other team in this deal?
They have to do what is best for the Chiefs! A 2nd rd pick this year getting his salary off the books or keeping the $9.8 on and a 3rd comp (late) next year?

If BA is staying long term fine, but I doubt they drafted Fisher to play RT forever.

Oxford 04-26-2013 10:27 AM

Or hold onto him until the first injury of a LT during training camp(s). The Chiefs might have more leverage at that time, although the pick would be in next years draft.

ILChief 04-26-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9630716)
Signing Albert to a long term deal means that our O-line is set for the next six years--not only set, but will probably be the best O-line in the league. With most of our pro-bowlers hitting their prime now, that is a long time to make significant runs at the Super Bowl.

Keep Albert, draft Bostic (unless by some strange stroke of luck Cyprien is still there) with the 3.a and just keep loading up year after year after year. We have the foundations for a dynasty in place--lets take advantage of it.

He's not signing here long term. If he did, it wouldn't be to play LT

KC_Lee 04-26-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9630667)
That's why I think Albert is still going to be gone. You don't draft a RT at 1.1

Consider what team we are talking about here. Quite possibly the most cursed team in the history of the NFL.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.