ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Electronics Projected Depth Chart (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206750)

Direckshun 04-26-2009 05:59 PM

Projected Depth Chart
 
QB: Cassel, Thigpen, Croyle
RB: Johnson, Charles, Williams, Smith
FB: Cox

WR: Bowe, Bradley, Engram, Lawrence, Webb
TE: Cottam, O'Connell

LT: Albert, Taylor
LG: Waters, Smith
C: Niswanger, Smith
RG: Goff, Richardson
RT: McIntosh, Brown

DE: Jackson, McBride
NT: Tyler, Edwards
Undertackle: Dorsey
DE: Magee, Boone

OLB: Hali, Williams
ILB: Thomas, Beisel
ILB: Johnson, Mays
OLB: Vrabel, Robertson

CB: Flowers, Carr, Washington, Daniels, Leggett
S: Page, Pollard, Morgan, McGraw

K: Succop
P: Colquitt
LS: Purdum
KR/PR: Lawrence, Charles

BWillie 04-26-2009 06:11 PM

Man, we are going to suck.

DeezNutz 04-26-2009 06:12 PM

LJ should be written very lightly in pencil.

MIAdragon 04-26-2009 06:14 PM

it looks like Succop had a 40% TB rate in 06. Not bad.

ChiefsRoyalsMizzou 04-26-2009 06:14 PM

here comes a 5-11 season...

Reerun_KC 04-26-2009 06:14 PM

That is a brutle roster...

Basileus777 04-26-2009 06:16 PM

Before all the Dorsey at NT talk starts, Haley said in one of his recent press conferences that Dorsey is going to play outside.

Just Passin' By 04-26-2009 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsRoyalsMizzou (Post 5716459)
here comes a 5-11 season...

That'd be a 3 game improvement against a much more difficult schedule.

TRR 04-26-2009 06:17 PM

I don"t believe Magee will start. Plans can change, but after what Haley said about Dorsey, it sounds likes they have plans of keeping Dorsey outside at a 3-4 DE.

Mr. Krab 04-26-2009 06:18 PM

We'll find out how much difference coaching makes because the roster isn't significantly different overall.

Basileus777 04-26-2009 06:19 PM

I don't really expect Tamba to start either, he'd probably have to be more of a third down player at OLB. Vrable and Hali both starting at OLB would be brutal for our pass coverage.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2009 06:19 PM

We are going to get absolutely annihilated.

Our run D and ST coverage will be good, but every other facet of our team will ****ing suck beyond comprehension.

the Talking Can 04-26-2009 06:20 PM

Cassell was a draft pick, you can bold his name ;)

Basileus777 04-26-2009 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5716492)
We are going to get absolutely annihilated.

Our run D and ST coverage will be good, but every other facet of our team will ****ing suck beyond comprehension.

Yep. We still don't have any way of getting pressure and our LBers are going to get killed in coverage.

ChiefsFanatic 04-26-2009 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 5716435)
Man, we are going to suck.

Going to?

milkman 04-26-2009 06:22 PM

I can't believe we still have Damion SuckIntosh penciled in as the stater at RT.

****.

the Talking Can 04-26-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5716492)
We are going to get absolutely annihilated.

Our run D and ST coverage will be good, but every other facet of our team will ****ing suck beyond comprehension.

so?

there is no way we can repair the damage Herm did to this team in one shortened offseason.....

Reerun_KC 04-26-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716511)
so?

there is no way we can repair the damage Herm did to this team in one shortened offseason.....

QFMFT!

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2009 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5716509)
I can't believe we still have Damion SuckIntosh penciled in as the stater at RT.

****.

I can't believe that, or the fact that we still have NO ONE to rush the passer.

We may break our own record for sacks in 2009.

Infidel Goat 04-26-2009 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716496)
Cassell was a draft pick, you can bold his name ;)

Vrabel too, for that matter.

MIAdragon 04-26-2009 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716518)
I can't believe that, or the fact that we still have NO ONE to rush the passer.

We may break our own record for sacks in 2009.

No F'ing way.

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 5716532)
No F'ing way.

OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716511)
so?

there is no way we can repair the damage Herm did to this team in one shortened offseason.....

True, but it would be nice to actually start the repair rather than thinking that the best way to fix a broken toilet and leaking shower (our pass rush and o-line) is by putting up wallpaper (signing STers and run stoppers).

Mecca 04-26-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716537)
OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

Maybe Vrabel can throw is broke dick at them.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 5716453)
it looks like Succop had a 40% TB rate in 06. Not bad.

With a college ball that travels about 10-15% longer.

Archie Bunker 04-26-2009 06:30 PM

Well the defense looks better than last year but I can only imagine what Baltimore is going to do week 1 to our offense.

Basileus777 04-26-2009 06:30 PM

You can't really compare this draft to last year. Last year was a much stronger draft and we had a lot more picks. We were in a position at #3 where anyone we would feasible take would be a reach. Jackson wasn't ideal at #3, but he has the potential to help us more than any other option there except for Raji.

Buehler445 04-26-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716537)
OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

You are 100% correct, but isn't that consistent with the value in the draft? I must have heard 100 time that this draft is deep offensively and next years is deep defensively? Isn't that what was SUPPOSED to happen?
Posted via Mobile Device

MIAdragon 04-26-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5716546)
With a college ball that travels about 10-15% longer.

Hmm I did not know that, thanks.

Just Passin' By 04-26-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5716541)
True, but it would be nice to actually start the repair rather than thinking that the best way to fix a broken toilet and leaking shower (our pass rush and o-line) is by putting up wallpaper (signing STers and run stoppers).

The Chiefs gave up the second most yards per carry in the league last season.

Mecca 04-26-2009 06:33 PM

Anyone who plays the Chiefs this year should just throw intermediate passing routes every play they'd kill us.

MIAdragon 04-26-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716537)
OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

LMAO I figured, but I agree its going to be more epic suck.

MIAdragon 04-26-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5716558)
Anyone who plays the Chiefs this year should just throw intermediate passing routes every play they'd kill us.

its been like that for a long time it seems.

the Talking Can 04-26-2009 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5716541)
True, but it would be nice to actually start the repair rather than thinking that the best way to fix a broken toilet and leaking shower (our pass rush and o-line) is by putting up wallpaper (signing STers and run stoppers).

run stopping is mere wallpaper?


seriously?


look, they have clearly prioritized things differently than you....you keep trying to ascribe bad faith to their decisions which is a cheap way to argue....

milkman 04-26-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716537)
OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

Tamba Hali FTW!!!!

Mr_Tomahawk 04-26-2009 06:37 PM

Eh...Could be worse. Herm could be finishing out his last year of his contract along with Carl. We were on pace to go 0-16 this year with Herm's rebuilding scheme.

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5716578)
Tamba Hali FTW!!!!

Never mind, that earlier comment wasn't at all hyperbole.

EPIC SUCK.

Mecca 04-26-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716583)
Never mind, that earlier comment wasn't at all hyperbole.

EPIC SUCK.

You're gonna bring out that dude who thinks Tamba Hali is gonna be a great stand up rusher.

Reaper16 04-26-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716511)
so?

there is no way we can repair the damage Herm did to this team in one shortened offseason.....

I don't think that Herm did much damage at all to the team. In fact the team is in a much better position for future success as a result of his little youth movement. The problem with Herm is that he just couldn't effectively coach the team on gameday.

milkman 04-26-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716583)
Never mind, that earlier comment wasn't at all hyperbole.

EPIC SUCK.

Hey....wait.....forget my last post.

Bryant Johnston FTW!!!!!!!

keg in kc 04-26-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5716537)
OK, I'll admit, that comment was a bit hyperbolic.

But be honest:

Who the **** do you expect to rush the passer?

Seriously?

They'll be more sacks from the scheme alone. And I think the line play will be better, which will make it easier for everyone else to do their jobs, including rushing the passer.

They won't set the world on fire, but I'd be surprised if they aren't way over double last year's number.

Basileus777 04-26-2009 06:41 PM

Herm also couldn't develop talent for shit. Being a piss-poor headcoach and losing enough games to get high draft picks doesn't mean he did a good job rebuilding.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716565)
run stopping is mere wallpaper?


seriously?


look, they have clearly prioritized things differently than you....you keep trying to ascribe bad faith to their decisions which is a cheap way to argue....

I don't ascribe bad faith, I ascribe bad judgment. Never once have I said they did anything in bad faith. They aren't picking guys to fail, they are making bad picks.

There's a reason why run pluggers and strong side ends don't go in the top 10, and it has to do with value.

If you can't rush the passer in a passing league, you can't win. We didn't even attempt to address this. I'd be we are a top 10 run D and a bottom 5 pass D next year.

milkman 04-26-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5716591)
I don't think that Herm did much damage at all to the team. In fact the team is in a much better position for future success as a result of his little youth movement. The problem with Herm is that he just couldn't effectively coach the team on gameday.

The problem is that so many of those picks simply don't fit in the new 34 scheme.

Mecca 04-26-2009 06:42 PM

What are the 3 most valued things in the league..

QB
Guys who rush the QB
Guys who block the QB's blind side

QB driven league...I don't see run stuff coming into this.

patteeu 04-26-2009 06:43 PM

Has anyone indicated that Johnson will be an ILB? I would have guessed Johnson as OLB and Vrabel inside.

SBK 04-26-2009 06:43 PM

We will be better than we were last year. However, using our top picks on D-line I'm not counting on them doing anything this year.

Reaper16 04-26-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5716602)
The problem is that so many of those picks simply don't fit in the new 34 scheme.

Yeah, its a significant problem.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-26-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5716597)
They'll be more sacks from the scheme alone. And I think the line play will be better, which will make it easier for everyone else to do their jobs, including rushing the passer.

They won't set the world on fire, but I'd be surprised if they aren't way over double last year's number.

Cleveland had a horrible pass rush last year in the 3-4. San Diego's sucked w/o Merriman. If you don't have edge rushers, you aren't doing shit for pass rushing in the 3-4

Let's put it this way. A team with a line of Williams, Olshansky, and Castillo had 28 sacks.

A team with Shaun Rogers had 17 sacks.

Dallas had 59 sacks with a pretty crappy front.

keg in kc 04-26-2009 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 5716608)
Has anyone indicated that Johnson will be an ILB? I would have guessed Johnson as OLB and Vrabel inside.

I'd assume if they're in any sort of 3-4 set, Johnson would be the coverage backer and Thomas the between the tackles backer. Or if playing under, DJ will, Thomas mike, Vrable Sam and Hali (?) in the flex position. But I don't know.

veist 04-26-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5716511)
so?

there is no way we can repair the damage Herm did to this team in one shortened offseason.....

Don't forget to save some of the blame for King Carl because this dogshit taco is on him just as much as on that other douche.

shaneo69 04-26-2009 06:57 PM

If we start that defensive lineup that Direkshun is suggesting, we should be pretty good, assuming the league allows us to play 4 linemen and 4 LB's at the same time.

OnTheWarpath15 04-26-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaneo69 (Post 5716682)
If we start that defensive lineup that Direkshun is suggesting, we should be pretty good, assuming the league allows us to play 4 linemen and 4 LB's at the same time.

LMAO

TEX 04-26-2009 06:59 PM

Man we suck worse when you actually see the roster. YIKES!

keg in kc 04-26-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaneo69 (Post 5716682)
If we start that defensive lineup that Direkshun is suggesting, we should be pretty good, assuming the league allows us to play 4 linemen and 4 LB's at the same time.

Our guys suck so much we'd suck anyway.

bdeg 04-26-2009 07:01 PM

have not read the thread, might have been mentioned but..
washington will NOT be the nickel back also maybe O'connell at FB sometimes for the Kris Wilson role


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.