;)

Would you rather play a schedule of average to above average teams, or a schedule of average teams, some shit teams, and a couple of top 5's?

Notre Dame beat a pretty good Stanford team. I can remember Ohio State and OU getting blown out in National title games. This is no different. Notre Dame won all of their games and deserved to be there. I don't like the system that gets them there, but until you have a playoff it's the same old story.

It needs to be at least 8 teams, can we agree on that?

:clap: This

It needs to be exactly eight teams. 16 is pointless, as nine through sixteen bring nothing to the conversation, and the tournament would last a month. Having Nebraska, Northern Illinois, and Oregon State in the playoff would be a farce.

K State got blasted in their bowl game against the Ducks. Did they belong or deserve that bowl game?

If ****** would have made one of 3 FG's KC would probably have another ring right now...

THIS.

That's a good question really.

I would like to see a team that had to go through the gauntlet of a conference championship game to get to the national championship game personally.

There should be no independent teams. Everyone needs to be on the same playing field.

The conferences aren't even playing on the same field. I don't know why it's a big deal that Notre Dame is independent. The reason teams like Penn State and Miami joined conferences didn't have anything to do with integrity or fairness, it was because it made them more money.

Yeah, because being an inde is a huge advantage...

To me, 4 is enough and anything more than 8 would be awful.

What I don't like is that the teams in college that go to bowl games have a month off from games. I think that creates too much down time that the players get out of rythm or be on the same page.

That is three to four weeks from their last game played. I just don't like the month long lag between the season and bowl games.