ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 5 1234 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football WSJ: Trading for a Quarterback Doesn't Really Help (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271759)

The Franchise 04-05-2013 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9559102)
Logic Fail by the article.

If trading for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't trade for QBs.

Let's follow the logic to drafting.

If drafting for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't draft QBs.

Yeah...that works.


By the way, Brett Farve wasn't drafted by Green Bay...and Steve Young was with the Bucs before the 9ers. You don't do these things because they always work...you do it because there's a chance.
Did Brett Favre play 7-8 seasons with the Falcons before being traded? No.

How about Steve Young with the Bucs? Oh....he didn't?

Rausch 04-05-2013 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9559279)
Did Brett Favre play 7-8 seasons with the Falcons before being traded? No.

How about Steve Young with the Bucs? Oh....he didn't?
I don't believe that was the criteria.

The one huge difference here is the ability of a HC/GM to EVALUATE TALENT.

The guy that traded for Young also drafted well.

The guy that traded for Favre also drafted well.

IT ALL FALLS ON THE ABILITY OF THE FRANCHISE TO EVALUATE TALNET...

philfree 04-05-2013 12:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9559287)
I don't believe that was the criteria.

The one huge difference here is the ability of a HC/GM to EVALUATE TALENT.

The guy that traded for Young also drafted well.

The guy that traded for Favre also drafted well.

IT ALL FALLS ON THE ABILITY OF THE FRANCHISE TO EVALUATE TALNET...
Nhu-u you have to take a shot and play the odds so you can at least say you tried!

Rausch 04-05-2013 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9559320)
Nhu-u you have to take a shot and play the odds so you can at least say you tried!
I'm guilty of that...fair 'nuff...

philfree 04-05-2013 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9559321)
I'm guilty of that...fair 'nuff...
I eally didn't mean you. I thought the bolded part of waht you posted was dead on. It's all about getting the evaluations right and getting those players or player/QB in this case.

philfree 04-05-2013 12:22 PM
I'm sick of peole posting the logic for us to draft a QB. It's beyond redundant and besides that posting about here is like singing to the choir.

RealSNR 04-05-2013 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9559338)
I'm sick of peole posting the logic for us to draft a QB. It's beyond redundant and besides that posting about here is like singing to the choir.
We do it because guys like Black Bob happen.

And this guy:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9559102)
Logic Fail by the article.

If trading for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't trade for QBs.

Let's follow the logic to drafting.

If drafting for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't draft QBs.

Yeah...that works.


By the way, Brett Farve wasn't drafted by Green Bay...and Steve Young was with the Bucs before the 9ers. You don't do these things because they always work...you do it because there's a chance.

loochy 04-05-2013 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9559102)
Logic Fail by the article.

If trading for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't trade for QBs.

Let's follow the logic to drafting.

If drafting for a qb has more failures than successes then teams shouldn't draft QBs.

Yeah...that works.


By the way, Brett Farve wasn't drafted by Green Bay...and Steve Young was with the Bucs before the 9ers. You don't do these things because they always work...you do it because there's a chance.
You are gay.

TEX 04-05-2013 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9559270)
Wasn't traded. Therefore isn't a part of this discussion.
FYI - Rich Gannon was brought up. Therefore it became part of the discussion. Capisce?

warpaint* 04-05-2013 02:25 PM
I just hope this regime is quick to cut ties when this turd proves his stink. Outside of that what's done is done. Well that and draft one one later this month. ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.
Page 5 of 5 1234 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.