ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Albert/Joeckel perspective (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272267)

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9604539)
Which ones?
Posted via Mobile Device

It was back in February. Off the top of my head Texas, A&M and a few others.

Who ****ing cares? Don't act like I'M the guy that's made the decision to pass on him.

OnTheWarpath15 04-19-2013 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9604525)
Passing on Geno is an absolute embarrasing move by the team. Same shit, different year. I'd still like someone to point out a "legit" reason for not drafting him.

It doesn't even have to be Geno.

Amazing how these "scouts" went from Barkley being a 1st overall talent to being a scrub in a matter of a year.

It's just comical that anyone puts any stock into what guys like Kiper (I'll see you at Mike Williams' HOF induction) and Todd McShay think.

OnTheWarpath15 04-19-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604532)
Who said it was "okay"?

That said, I do believe that most people on Chiefsplanet tend to overvalue draft picks. If you look at the history of the Chiefs second round picks over the past 20 years, you're looking at a virtual wasteland.

Because the organization has been run by dipshits?

Successful teams pull ****ing gems from the late rounds, we can't even get it right in the 2nd, where there's some R1 talent left over.

Carl/Pioli ****ups aren't a reason to give away valuable picks.

SAUTO 04-19-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604542)
It was back in February. Off the top of my head Texas, A&M and a few others.

Who ****ing cares? Don't act like I'M the guy that's made the decision to pass on him.

You are dead set against drafting him. if you had watched at least six games I would think you would know which ones...
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9604541)
If you had to put a "bust rate" on Geno Smith, what would it be? I'm fine with people who don't think he'll be a good NFL QB, but the potential for Geno to really succeed in the league HAS to be acknowledged. There's a reason why he's the #1 QB over Barkley and friends.

No idea. It depends on where he goes and what he's asked to do.

I think the reason he's rated higher is because the other QB's need a shit ton more development. But I also think it's possible that a few of those guys have higher ceilings, especially Bray.

Although reports on anxiety issues would worry me about him.

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9604548)
Because the organization has been run by dipshits?

Successful teams pull ****ing gems from the late rounds, we can't even get it right in the 2nd, where there's some R1 talent left over.

Carl/***** ****ups aren't a reason to give away valuable picks.

I've stated repeatedly that I would LOVE for the Chiefs to grab Nassib, Bray, Barkley - whomever - in the second or third round and develop him.

But the Geno Mafia twists my words into "not wanting a QB". It's ****ing bullshit.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-19-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9604545)
It doesn't even have to be Geno.

Amazing how these "scouts" went from Barkley being a 1st overall talent to being a scrub in a matter of a year.

It's just comical that anyone puts any stock into what guys like Kiper (I'll see you at Mike Williams' HOF induction) and Todd McShay think.

That's true. Hell, I wouldn't mind a bit if they had taken Barkley at one. I like his game.

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9604551)
You are dead set against drafting him. if you had watched at least six games I would think you would know which ones...
Posted via Mobile Device


I don't like the guy at 1.1, especially after they traded for Alex Smith.

Deal with it and please, shut the **** about it, okay?

SAUTO 04-19-2013 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604553)
No idea. It depends on where he goes and what he's asked to do.

I think the reason he's rated higher is because the other QB's need a shit ton more development. But I also think it's possible that a few of those guys have higher ceilings, especially Bray.

Although reports on anxiety issues would worry me about him.

what about bray has made you think he has a higher ceiling?


You watch him play?

Listen to his interviews?
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9604560)
That's true. Hell, I wouldn't mind a bit if they had taken Barkley at one. I like his game.

Barkley was completely screwed over by Lane Kiffin, although I would have some concern about his arm strength after the injury.

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9604564)
what about bray has made you think he has a higher ceiling?


You watch him play?

Listen to his interviews?
Posted via Mobile Device

Arm strength, size, age.

SAUTO 04-19-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604562)
I don't like the guy at 1.1, especially after they traded for Alex Smith.

Deal with it and please, shut the **** about it, okay?

No. It's not ok.

why is it ok for you to keep saying shit that you are just repeating from the talking heads?

Maybe you should shut the **** up already dude.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 04-19-2013 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604567)
Arm strength, size, age.

And he's a ****ing drooling mongoloid. And thinks it's cool to tear other people's shit up.

Yeah that's the guy I want to draft
Posted via Mobile Device

RealSNR 04-19-2013 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9604553)
No idea. It depends on where he goes and what he's asked to do.

I think the reason he's rated higher is because the other QB's need a shit ton more development. But I also think it's possible that a few of those guys have higher ceilings, especially Bray.

Although reports on anxiety issues would worry me about him.

Let's say it's the Chiefs that he goes to (because a boy can still dream). Would you put the bust rate as high as 70?

For me, I think Geno's bust rate would be highest if he went to a team like the Jets or Jaguars. I would even go as high as 60% if he got drafted by those teams. I think a team like Buffalo or Arizona might be okay for him. Under 50%

If it were KC, I'd put that rate at under 40%. It's not what Andrew Luck had, but tough shit. If a team is as unlucky as we are, that's a sign that the team better learn how to GET lucky. And that may mean creating our own luck.

DaneMcCloud 04-19-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9604568)
No. It's not ok.

why is it ok for you to keep saying shit that you are just repeating from the talking heads?

Maybe you should shut the **** up already dude.
Posted via Mobile Device

Repeating from which talking heads? What the **** is wrong with you?

When have I EVER repeated something from a media source?

And I'm not going to ask again nicely, ****head. Shut the **** about it. It's MY opinion, cockbreath.

I'm not flipping YOU shit because I disagree with YOU, am I? I can, mother****er.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.