ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft We better draft this mother****er (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265999)

RunKC 10-31-2012 06:50 PM

We better draft this mother****er
 
With the 33rd pick in the NFL draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select...Stedman Bailey.

Last year: 12 TD's, 1,279 yards
So far this year: 14 TD's, 800 yards (on pace for 22 TD's and 1,450 yards)

I don't give a shit if Bowe is here or not next year. Draft this mother****er. Great hands, great speed, crisp route runner, BAMF. Can play in the slot or on the outside.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aOnISzeG2Ao" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ace Gunner 10-31-2012 06:55 PM

yep. been watching him, baller str8 up. smart, tough, moves, big soft hands. if he's there, you gotta take him.

Titty Meat 10-31-2012 07:22 PM

I'll take the kid from Tennessee Tech instead

milkman 10-31-2012 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 9069877)
yep. been watching him, baller str8 up. smart, tough, moves, big soft hands. if he's there, you gotta take him.

Who hasn't been able to get open in the last 2 games.

Bump 10-31-2012 07:31 PM

sounds good, I'm all for drafting a WR in the 2nd round. It would be good for Barkley, Bray or Wilson to grow with a young stud WR.

Chiefspants 10-31-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9069865)
With the 33rd pick in the NFL draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select...Stedman Bailey.

Last year: 12 TD's, 1,279 yards
So far this year: 14 TD's, 800 yards (on pace for 22 TD's and 1,450 yards)

I don't give a shit if Bowe is here or not next year. Draft this mother****er. Great hands, great speed, crisp route runner, BAMF. Can play in the slot or on the outside.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aOnISzeG2Ao" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Eh, he's been exceedingly mediocre against legitimate competition this year. (Pretty much against the whole big 12 outside of Baylor.) He also doesn't have the ideal build for a starting NFL wideout.

bowener 10-31-2012 07:40 PM

Smith/Bailey combo would be awesome. Smith would have somebody he is accustomed to already on the team. Might help speed up his learning curve... would also mean we could dump McMidget.

Titty Meat 10-31-2012 07:43 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/26UYATqb7ZI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Will be able to get this guy in the 2nd round maybe even the 3rd because he was kicked out of Tennessee. Dudes a beast.

Woodchuck 10-31-2012 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9069925)
I'll take the kid from Tennessee Tech instead

Da'Rick Rodgers. He used to play at Tennesee and he is better than Hunter and Patterson. He's a pothead but is in the Julio Jones/AJ Green mold.

There is another underdog guy from Louisianna Monroe that Charles davis was talking about last night on Total Access. He is big and he looked really good.

Hog's Gone Fishin 10-31-2012 08:09 PM

Meh. He's too slow, too small, poor hands and he's only played against poor competition. CP

GloryDayz 10-31-2012 08:43 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Or we're doomed to more of this...

RunKC 10-31-2012 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9069939)
Who hasn't been able to get open in the last 2 games.

Well, it would help if West Virginia's OL didn't get their shit stuffed in every play giving Geno 2 seconds to drop back and find a receiver.

WV 10-31-2012 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9069939)
Who hasn't been able to get open in the last 2 games.

I think he got hurt against Texas Tech and he was limited against KState. He played sparingly and was noticeably hobbled.

Ace Gunner 11-01-2012 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9069939)
Who hasn't been able to get open in the last 2 games.

except that over the past year and a half he's been the spark plug for the guy that is possibly going to beat USC QB Matt Barkley out of the first pick in the draft.

JoeyChuckles 11-01-2012 05:17 AM

If he has sex with mothers then I don't want him.

AussieChiefsFan 11-01-2012 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 9070557)
If he has sex with mothers then I don't want him.

Sorry but that was dry.

R8RFAN 11-01-2012 06:00 AM

Since the Chiefs fans have been deprived of a QB so long the NFL and every other team has decided to let the Chiefs pick as many players as they want first in an effort to stop the whining.

siberian khatru 11-01-2012 06:03 AM

Isn't he Oprah's "boyfriend"?

BoneKrusher 11-01-2012 06:13 AM

Yep
Bailey was hobbled the last two games.
Geno in the first and Bailey in the second would be fine with me.

BlackHelicopters 11-01-2012 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 9070557)
If he has sex with mothers then I don't want him.

even unwed mothers?

beach tribe 11-01-2012 07:52 AM

Reminds me of Steve Smith

loochy 11-01-2012 08:24 AM

...but we are stacked at WR. Behind Bowe we still have Baldwin (future HOFer), Breaston (the best 3rd wideout EVER), and the ever elusive RUN DMC! /preseason talk

R8RFAN 11-01-2012 08:26 AM

you will not keep Bowe, he wants out

King_Chief_Fan 11-01-2012 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9070570)
Since the Chiefs fans have been deprived of a QB so long the NFL and every other team has decided to let the Chiefs pick as many players as they want first in an effort to stop the whining.

i think that is fair.......however, we don't want any tips from Raiders about 1st round selections.

hometeam 11-01-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9070780)
you will not keep Bowe, he wants out

You missed it.

patteeu 11-01-2012 08:40 AM

I'd rather see the Chiefs take a CB with their 2nd if all else is equal.

Thig Lyfe 01-06-2013 11:59 AM

It would be pretty awesome to see Geno and Stedman together again in KC.

Rausch 01-06-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9070811)
I'd rather see the Chiefs take a CB with their 2nd if all else is equal.

Yup.

We have nothing other than Flowers...

Hootie 01-06-2013 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9069959)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/26UYATqb7ZI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Will be able to get this guy in the 2nd round maybe even the 3rd because he was kicked out of Tennessee. Dudes a beast.

his name is god damn Da'Rick?

I can't draft anyone with that name. ****.

Chief Roundup 01-06-2013 12:24 PM

Well if he goes 33 he goes to the Jaguars. But depending on what happens with Tyson Jackson and Dorsey we will probably draft a DE with the 34th pick.

jd1020 01-06-2013 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9069865)
With the 33rd pick in the NFL draft, the Jacksonville Jaguars select...Stedman Bailey.

Last year: 12 TD's, 1,279 yards
So far this year: 14 TD's, 800 yards (on pace for 22 TD's and 1,450 yards)

I don't give a shit if Bowe is here or not next year. Draft this mother****er. Great hands, great speed, crisp route runner, BAMF. Can play in the slot or on the outside.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aOnISzeG2Ao" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fixed.

jd1020 01-06-2013 12:38 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vx6pGFvDqt0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That's him burning Amerson in the beginning, one of the best CBs in the draft.

NIUhuskies 01-06-2013 12:41 PM

Bailey and Geno Smith have been playing w eachother since high school. talk about chemistry. itd be cool to see them both in KC

hometeam 01-06-2013 12:43 PM

I'd hit it.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-06-2013 01:53 PM

Draft his QB and I'll be doing backflips...

The Rick 01-06-2013 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9288056)
his name is god damn Da'Rick?

I can't draft anyone with that name. ****.

You got a problem with that name or something?

O.city 01-06-2013 02:50 PM

I'd take Amerson or Rhodes in the 2nd, Bailey might be there in the 3rd.


Win.

Molitoth 01-06-2013 02:58 PM

Austin will be gone in the first, bailey in the second.

O.city 01-06-2013 02:58 PM

Right now, Bailey is projected in the 3rd.

Priest31kc 01-06-2013 03:03 PM

Cant see Bailey lasting until the 3rd...I think he'll rise after the Combine...

KevB 01-06-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9288147)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vx6pGFvDqt0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That's him burning Amerson in the beginning, one of the best CBs in the draft.

Cordarrelle is who I've been touting with our 2nd rounder. Big, fast, talented playmaker still with some growing to do.

eazyb81 01-06-2013 03:09 PM

A shit ton of WR talent in this draft, which will push some top tier prospects like Patterson, Rodgers, Bailey, Hunter, etc. down to the 2nd and 3rd rounds.

I'd love to see us snag Patterson in the 2nd. That guy is an absolute monster.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:11 PM

Why would anyone advocate taking a receiver before his official 40 time at The Combines?

O.city 01-06-2013 03:11 PM

Best QB first round, Best CB second round, trade early 3rd to Eagles for Maclin, best DE available 3rd round, BPA there out.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288633)
Best QB first round, Best CB second round, trade early 3rd to Eagles for Maclin, best DE available 3rd round, BPA there out.

No.

Where's your starting ILB next to Johnson? Where's your starting safety opposite Berry?

There are plenty of receiving options available. Trading for Maclin and handing him a big contract would be dumb.

RealSNR 01-06-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288632)
Why would anyone advocate taking a receiver before his official 40 time at The Combines?

Because we're football fans and it's fun to speculate and argue? :shrug:

O.city 01-06-2013 03:18 PM

Well, if we are staying in a 34, the ILB next to DJ doesn't have to be a high rounder. Shane Skov in the 3rd or 4th would be a perfect fit. And the FS doesn't have to be a high pick either, we don't really need all pros everywhere.


Jackson and Cassel are coming off the books, we've got money.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9288644)
Because we're football fans and it's fun to speculate and argue? :shrug:

Then I guess the entire forum has changed because just a few short years ago when Hamas, Mecca, OTWP58 and I did that very same thing (albeit, mostly after The Combines), we were all chastised on a daily basis and confronted with "If YOU know so much, why are YOU working for an NFL team?".

Neato.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288654)
Then I guess the entire forum has changed because just a few short years ago when Hamas, Mecca, OTWP58 and I did that very same thing (albeit, mostly after The Combines), we were all chastised on a daily basis and confronted with "If YOU know so much, why are YOU working for an NFL team?".

Neato.

Yeah, it's changed alot.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288648)
Well, if we are staying in a 34, the ILB next to DJ doesn't have to be a high rounder. Shane Skov in the 3rd or 4th would be a perfect fit. And the FS doesn't have to be a high pick either, we don't really need all pros everywhere.


Jackson and Cassel are coming off the books, we've got money.

It shouldn't be about "having money", it should be about the BPA for each position and drafting for the future.

Kendrick Lewis is about as dependable as a 1976 AMC Pacer and Abe Elam is done. The Chiefs need at least one safety from the draft and one in free agency. ILB is also a must.

Otherwise, the Chiefs are going to lose at lot of games 41-38.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288661)
It shouldn't be about "having money", it should be about the BPA for each position and drafting for the future.

Kendrick Lewis is about as dependable as a 1976 AMC Pacer and Abe Elam is done. The Chiefs need at least one safety from the draft and one in free agency. ILB is also a must.

Otherwise, the Chiefs are going to lose at lot of games 41-38.

Eh, ILB isn't a MUST, it's a need though. Again, I think Skov from Stanford in the 3rd or 4th would be a great pick.

I think Lewis was hurt all year, but we definitely need more depth back there.


I was actually a little bit impressed with Tyson Hartman late in the year on the back end.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288661)
It shouldn't be about "having money", it should be about the BPA for each position and drafting for the future.

Kendrick Lewis is about as dependable as a 1976 AMC Pacer and Abe Elam is done. The Chiefs need at least one safety from the draft and one in free agency. ILB is also a must.

Otherwise, the Chiefs are going to lose at lot of games 41-38.

And Maclin just turned 24. I don't think we could get a player of that quality in the third round and if we have two 3rd rounders, it could be an idea.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288665)
Eh, ILB isn't a MUST, it's a need though. Again, I think Skov from Stanford in the 3rd or 4th would be a great pick.

So you're heading into 2013 with Derrick Johnson and Brandon Silar as your ILB?

Yeah, good luck with that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288665)
I think Lewis was hurt all year, but we definitely need more depth back there.

I was actually a little bit impressed with Tyson Hartman late in the year on the back end.

The secondary, outside of Berry and Flowers, sucked ass. The turnover won't happen in one offseason but there needs to be serious changes, if the Chiefs plan to compete for even 8-8 next year.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288668)
And Maclin just turned 24. I don't think we could get a player of that quality in the third round and if we have two 3rd rounders, it could be an idea.

First off, why would Philly trade him? Secondly, you're better off drafting a guy to compete with Bowe, Breaston and Baldwin than trading for a guy.

If Bowe re-signs, WR is the least of the Chiefs immediate needs.

jd1020 01-06-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288637)
No.

Where's your starting ILB next to Johnson? Where's your starting safety opposite Berry?

There are plenty of receiving options available. Trading for Maclin and handing him a big contract would be dumb.

1) Geno Smith, QB
2) Xavior Rhodes, CB
3a) Stedman Bailey, WR
3b) Shayne Skov, ILB
4) Zac Dysert/EJ Manuel/Landry Jones, QB
5) Zeke Motta, S

silver5liter 01-06-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9288682)
1) Geno Smith, QB
2) Xavior Rhodes, CB
3a) Stedman Bailey, WR
3b) Shayne Skov, ILB
4) Zac Dysert/EJ Manuel/Landry Jones, QB
5) Zeke Motta, S

I'd be cool with this

O.city 01-06-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288671)
So you're heading into 2013 with Derrick Johnson and Brandon Silar as your ILB?

Yeah, good luck with that.



The secondary, outside of Berry and Flowers, sucked ass. The turnover won't happen in one offseason but there needs to be serious changes, if the Chiefs plan to compete for even 8-8 next year.

Siler? No. I just gave you an example of a guy who is, IMO, just as good as Teo skill wise at ILB.

There will be alot of turnover, but you don't have to sink high draft picks on every spot to get a good player.

Obviously, we have to lock up Bowe and Albert. But we are also going to have Jacksons money and Cassels money to use.

There are some intriguing options at FS in this years Free agency class that I would look at. Not specifically pay a guy high money, but for depth wouldn't be a bad idea.

There's always Byrd, from Buffalo, who is a great FS and young.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288673)
First off, why would Philly trade him? Secondly, you're better off drafting a guy to compete with Bowe, Breaston and Baldwin than trading for a guy.

If Bowe re-signs, WR is the least of the Chiefs immediate needs.

This is the last year on his contract, and they've stated they aren't re signing him.


I like Baldwin alot more than others here, I think he still has a purpose, but I also would like to have a speed guy, like Maclin.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9288682)
1) Geno Smith, QB
2) Xavior Rhodes, CB
3a) Stedman Bailey, WR
3b) Shayne Skov, ILB
4) Zac Dysert/EJ Manuel/Landry Jones, QB
5) Zeke Motta, S

If the draft fell like that, we'd be set with 4 potential starters in the first four rounds.


Would be epic.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:32 PM

Speaking of the draft, when can we move draft planet back to the front page?

RealSNR 01-06-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288654)
Then I guess the entire forum has changed because just a few short years ago when Hamas, Mecca, OTWP58 and I did that very same thing (albeit, mostly after The Combines), we were all chastised on a daily basis and confronted with "If YOU know so much, why are YOU working for an NFL team?".

Neato.

True fans still ruled the roost back then. The very thought of the draft forum was repulsive to them, and if somebody ever carried their knowledge and expertise into another conversation, that's what created those comments.

They're the same douchebags that would have opposed the SOC Blackout. "You don't know any better, quit acting like you do, etc."

RealSNR 01-06-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9288682)
1) Geno Smith, QB
2) Xavior Rhodes, CB
3a) Stedman Bailey, WR
3b) Shayne Skov, ILB
4) Zac Dysert/EJ Manuel/Landry Jones, QB
5) Zeke Motta, S

LIKE

Setsuna 01-06-2013 03:35 PM

Get Percy Harvin.

Chief Roundup 01-06-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288689)
Siler? No. I just gave you an example of a guy who is, IMO, just as good as Teo skill wise at ILB.

There will be alot of turnover, but you don't have to sink high draft picks on every spot to get a good player.

Obviously, we have to lock up Bowe and Albert. But we are also going to have Jacksons money and Cassels money to use.

There are some intriguing options at FS in this years Free agency class that I would look at. Not specifically pay a guy high money, but for depth wouldn't be a bad idea.

There's always Byrd, from Buffalo, who is a great FS and young.

People keep saying that Tyson Jackson will be released and Dorsey is a FA. That makes DE very important. If we lose both of our starting DE's we will have to use a high pick on DE.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288689)
There will be alot of turnover, but you don't have to sink high draft picks on every spot to get a good player.

Who said anything about "high" draft choice? What the ****?

The position NEEDS to be addressed. You don't trade a 3rd rounder for a receiver IF you have three receivers under contract. As a matter of fact, the Chiefs shouldn't trade for a receiver, period. Too many needs at other positions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288689)
Obviously, we have to lock up Bowe and Albert. But we are also going to have Jacksons money and Cassels money to use.

Whatever. It's all about the signing bonus, not the "cap hit".

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9288708)
People keep saying that Tyson Jackson will be released and Dorsey is a FA. That makes DE very important. If we lose both of our starting DE's we will have to use a high pick on DE.

High pick?

No.

Chief Roundup 01-06-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288715)
High pick?

No.

I was meaning 2cd rounder.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288714)
Who said anything about "high" draft choice? What the ****?

The position NEEDS to be addressed. You don't trade a 3rd rounder for a receiver IF you have three receivers under contract. As a matter of fact, the Chiefs shouldn't trade for a receiver, period. Too many needs at other positions.



Whatever. It's all about the signing bonus, not the "cap hit".

It does need addressed.

Curious your feelings on any free agent spending this offseason?

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288750)
Signing bonus?

The guaranteed money. Give a guy $30 million upfront spread it over 7 years and pay him $500k a year for the first few years. That's the way other teams constantly sign free agent talent.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9288721)
I was meaning 2cd rounder.

First off, no one knows which defensive alignment the Chiefs will use. If they stay in the 3-4, they shouldn't spend anything higher than a 3rd rounder on a 5 tech, if even that.

If they switch to the 4-3, which I think would be a major setback considering the Chiefs have three linebackers in place to effectively run the 3-4, they can address that position in free agency.

There's no reason to spend a 2nd rounder on a DE, period.

Especially when they need a starting safety, ILB, two QB's and depth nearly everywhere.

Sorter 01-06-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288779)
First off, no one knows which defensive alignment the Chiefs will use. If they stay in the 3-4, they shouldn't spend anything higher than a 3rd rounder on a 5 tech, if even that.

If they switch to the 4-3, which I think would be a major setback considering the Chiefs have three linebackers in place to effectively run the 3-4, they can address that position in free agency.

There's no reason to spend a 2nd rounder on a DE, period.

If Sheldon Richardson fell, then yes. There's literally no chance of that happening, unless he goes full Dennard and punches a cop in the next month. ROFL

O.city 01-06-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288766)
The guaranteed money. Give a guy $30 million upfront spread it over 7 years and pay him $500k a year for the first few years. That's the way other teams constantly sign free agent talent.

Got it, I edited cause I figured thats waht you were talking about.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:55 PM

What are you guys thoughts on Margus Hunt with one of our 3rd rounders if he's there?


I figure if we stay in the 34, Jackson will be restructured and brought back. Atleast for depth.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288750)
It does need addressed.

Curious your feelings on any free agent spending this offseason?

Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

O.city 01-06-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288800)
Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

Gotcha.

Seems you are hoping we keep the 34?

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2013 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9288806)
Gotcha.

Seems you are hoping we keep the 34?

Absolutely.

O.city 01-06-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288810)
Absolutely.

I'm in the same boat.


I would really like to bring in Ray Horton as the DC if he gets outta Zona.

Chief Roundup 01-06-2013 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9288800)
Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

There is no way the need for 1 CB is more important than the need of 2 DE. This is a QB driven league. We need DLine to go along with our current pass rush to disrupt the opponents QB play.
The good defenses always have a better front 7 than the secondary.

jd1020 01-06-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9288823)
There is no way the need for 1 CB is more important than the need of 2 DE. This is a QB driven league. We need DLine to go along with our current pass rush to disrupt the opponents QB play.
The good defenses always have a better front 7 than the secondary.

So you believe this team needs a DE more than they need to get Arenas the **** off the field?

ROFL

O.city 01-06-2013 04:06 PM

We need a #2 CB. Badly.


And there are likely going to be a few really good ones available at the top of the 2nd round this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.