Bad idea notwithstanding, but PG-13, too?

Blow me, Hollywood.

Funny u mention that. I'm pretty sure the original film was the very first PG-13 rated film.
Posted via Mobile Device

No shit? I would have sworn it was R. Didn't it hold the record for most on screen deaths for a movie at that point, or something?

Whatever. I won't be seeing this turd remake, regardless.

I believe this is correct. A bit too much violence for PG, but no sexual content.

I always thought it was Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom but I guess it was just one of the movies that pushed us into the PG13 rating.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_..._rating_system

Adoption of PG-13 rating
Through the 1970s to 1984, explicit violence and gore in the films Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Poltergeist and Gremlins caused an uproar among parents over their PG rating.[12][13] Their complaints led Hollywood figure Steven Spielberg, director of Temple of Doom and producer of Gremlins, to suggest a new rating to MPAA president Jack Valenti for movies that have too much adult content to be rated PG, but not quite enough to be rated R. Spielberg's suggestion was for an intermediate rating of PG-13 or PG-14.[14] On conferring with cinema owners, Valenti and the MPAA introduced the PG-13 rating on July 1, 1984, indicating that some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. The Spielberg films were never re-rated.
The first film distributed with a PG-13 rating was Red Dawn (1984). Dreamscape and The Woman in Red were released on the same day the following week. The Flamingo Kid (1984) was the first film to receive the rating, but was not released until December 1984.[15]

:facepalm:

How did I forget that ****ing scene?...

No, just no.

Yea, it was basically Gremlins and Temple of Doom that broke the PG ratings back.

Shit, I forgot he was in that movie.

wow this looks bad

thor should have dealt with this shit sooner

It's Thor, Comedian, and Wonder Woman against a Bond villain. How can this be bad?

Just on principal, I won't see this. The idea of us getting attached by North Korea is absolutely ****ing absurd - it would be like Rhode Island stomping New York. Had the producers not sold out to China and altered the script, I would have given it a look. That scenario is believable.

All involved can kiss my ass. I'll stick with the original.

But they have a secret weapon that cancels out all of our technology!

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nGoe7BdGdlg?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This movie isn't going to work in a theatre full of people attached to cell phones and iPods.

You can't explain the mentality of a lifetime of "duck and cover" to kids you don't ever want to know what that means.