I would want Kareem Martin over Anthony Barr

Yes, let's pass on one of the top 3 3-4 OLB prospects for a 4-3 DE rated as a 2nd to 3rd round talent.:clap:

interesting you have no problem drafting barr when he is as raw as Hageman.

Hageman switched from playing TE

As for Kareem Martin, he is as athletic as Barr with better measurables.
https://i.imgur.com/XlGmydY.png

:clap:

I have no problem with Barr because he was actually one of the most productive pass rushers in a tougher conference in college. Barr is also 22 years old whereas Hageman is going to be 24 years old as a rookie. Nice try though.

Kareem Martin is a 4-3 DE, not a 3-4 OLB. He also had nowhere near the same level of production in college as Barr did.ROFL

tougher conference than whom, and judging by how? Barr played in the Pac-12; Martin ACC ; Hageman Big-10

you keep bring up age. why does it matter? rookie contracts are 4 yrs with a 5th yr option. That would put Barr at most at 27yrs old and Hageman at most at 29yrs old.

citation needed.

https://i.imgur.com/8lSj6Qd.png

do you even research before posting? Time and time again you say stuff and I prove it wrong. Aren't you embarrassed? I am embarrassed for you.
ROFL

I keep asking you dumbasses to tell me what exactly would you have Sutton do?

I don't give a rat's ass about Sutton, so this has no agenda.

The overall lack of talent at safety and ILB, no pass rush option at DE, lack of depth at OLB, and a vet corner who historically struggles in zone, and a rookie with only a couple of years of college experience at the position, and the overall lack of versatility limits adjustments.

So tell me, just what should he have done?

Everyone is a dumbass... lol...

Anyway, what I saw was a lack of creativity in blitz schemes, and this was also a problem with Crennel. Every team in the NFL knows Hali is coming every play and Justin Houston is coming most of the time. The ILBs and safeties rarely blitz. A 3-4 wasn't designed to be this way, but the Chiefs throw the same shit at a team week after week hoping it somehow works. I'd like to see more variation where and when the blitzes come. I want to see both OLBs dropping into coverage with some regularity, not one less than half the time. I want to see both ILBs being blitzed at various times. I want to see overload blitzes, etc. The best pressure, the quickest pressure, comes up the middle. The Chiefs have to do more to disrupt quarterbacks up the middle, yet they don't. I don't give anyone a pass in the organization by saying the pieces weren't there.

As for coverage, I don't think there is much the Chiefs could have done a whole lot differently. What I think is more the problem is that teams don't have to guess where pressure is coming from versus where the coverage areas will be. They know where pressure is coming from and they know what areas will be open, and that is the problem in a nutshell. On top of that, the entire secondary aside from Berry played pretty shitty last year, that doesn't help anything.

Mack at #1 ??? LMAO

Is this tool trying to hype up his ESPN movie "Draft Day"?

If Houston doesn't draft Manziel or Clowney, someone's getting fired.

Creativity requires talent and versatility from the positions that you are asking Sutton to be more creative with.

Hali is a liability in coverage, which is why you send him after the QB more than half the time.

Jordan was a liability in coverage, which is why he was sitting on the sidelines and Berry was in the box as a hybrid LB in subpackages on more than half the snaps.

And blitzing is far more effective when at least one of your DEs can create pressure.

Even when he did blitz DJ or Berry, the lack of any pressure from the DL made it far to easy for the blitz to be picled up.

I don't know how effective Sutton is, or can be, as a DC.
And I won't know until we fix those positions.

Rotate the DL and front 7 a little more to get some fresh legs on the field.

Added my replies in red.

10 Detroit Lions- Mike Evans, WR, Texas A&M

Wow-Lions would be pretty much unstoppable in the passing game. Wish the Chiefs could move up and take this guy-he is going to be a Touch Down machine.

I don't call recognition of limitations, and working within those limitations, fear, but that's just me.

I thought Sutton opened up with an inspired game plan against the Colts, with Abdullah in the box and Berry being allowed to roam more.

But once the Colts adjusted, those limitations bit us in the ass.

Only 3 players on this defense have any real versatility.

Question for you milk...

You know that Hali and Jordan can't cover shit if it was stuck to them... so....

If I need to make a play on defense, you'd expect that I'll rush Hali, likely rush Houston, and keep Jordan at home. That seems logical and well within the scope of limitations.

What do you think would happen if I rushed Derrick Johnson and Eric Berry while I dropped Hali, Houston, and Jordan into coverage?

My bets are, the line is completely unsuspecting and it will result in heavy QB pressure immediately, if not a sack. Curious your take. Now I don't expect this 2, 3, or 10 times a game and maybe not every game.

What if I rushed Jordan and Houston, but rotated Berry to cover LOLB flat, DJ to MLB, and Hali dropped to cover ROLB flat?

See what I'm getting at. You don't have to put non-coverage players into coverage situations often, but if you mix them up at the right times in the right mix, you can create some things. You can at least try some things. I didn't see enough of that from Sutton. I think he was bound by the limitations rather than trying to overcome the limitations by selectively pushing beyond those limitations.

But this all feeds into one of my draft rules: Don't draft LBs that can't cover. :)

He did that in season, and it worked well a couple times, but got burned after those first couple times..