ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL Rumors: Mahomes, Watson atop KC's QB wish list (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306510)

Mr_Tomahawk 03-10-2017 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778581)
Webb's velocity was a surprise to me, impressive.



The dude is big.

He lost his spot to Mahomes after dropping 20lbs from an illness that sidelined him.

He is my darkhorse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rico 03-10-2017 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12778597)
The dude is big.

He lost his spot to Mahomes after dropping 20lbs from an illness that sidelined him.

He is my darkhorse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just remember....I was on the bandwebbon first, biotch!!! ;)

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2017 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 12777285)
I wouldn't get too worked up for a QB in the 1st people
I think it's next year.
You are just gonna piss yourselves off and we will have another Geno Smith situation.
It's not fun.

No one in their right mind is getting "worked up" over KC drafting a QB. We have all come to expect sub-par reerunery when it comes to the Chiefs and QB's.

-King- 03-10-2017 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12778302)
Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

Why would the Raiders trade Palmer to a division rival?
Posted via Mobile Device

CoMoChief 03-10-2017 08:24 PM

If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Red Dawg 03-10-2017 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 12778652)
If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Only if they like him a ton and it would take more picks than we have to get far enough up. In 4 drafts he has not once traded up in the first two rounds for anyone that I recall. Even if we move back it feels like 2 defensive players will be the first two picks. When you are in cap hell and can't sign any vets to fill needs all you can do is draft or trade. He never trades so we will pick.

Tribal Warfare 03-10-2017 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 12778652)
If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Photo ops with Clark dictate otherwise

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12778513)
They don't currently have a backuo, unless bray is it. Contractually it's looking like they'll need Smith's space in 2018, but yes the starter in 17.

Fair enough, but we've always brought in a veteran QB to fill the backup spot instead of training a rookie.

Daniel and Foles

Have we ever even had a young QB on the active roster during the regular season?

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12778302)
Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

Which is why I was pretty surprised when I got beaten down around here for suggesting that the Chiefs should trade Foles during Preseason when teams lost their starters and where desperate to trade.

"we can't trade Foles, we might need him"
"we can't trade Foles, it might hurt his feelings after wanting to play for Reid"
"we can't trade foles .............

Vikings gave a 1st and 4th(conditional 3rd) for Bradford when he was considered a total mess and injury disaster.

How much would an extra 1st rounder be worth to use right now? Hell, even an extra 2nd would be trade-up gold.

Chiefs could have 'planned ahead' be in great shape to trade anywhere they wanted in this draft.

-King- 03-10-2017 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12778757)
Fair enough, but we've always brought in a veteran QB to fill the backup spot instead of training a rookie.

Daniel and Foles

Have we ever even had a young QB on the active roster during the regular season?

"Always" it's been 4 years.

And Murray was on the active roster for most of his years here.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12778788)
"Always" it's been 4 years.

And Murray was on the active roster for most of his years here.
Posted via Mobile Device

4 years is the entire sample size we have to work with, isn't it? Andy Reid has never elected to have a young QB as his #2, while in KC.

I believe that Murray was our 3rd QB and a game day inactive his entire time with the Chiefs.

-King- 03-10-2017 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12778796)
4 years is the entire sample size we have to work with, isn't it? Andy Reid has never elected to have a young QB as his #2, while in KC.

I believe that Murray was our 3rd QB and a game day inactive his entire time with the Chiefs.

3rd QBs even if inactive on game day are still on the active roster
Posted via Mobile Device

jd1020 03-10-2017 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12778491)
Can you please post his "average play"?

Facts not Fiction remember? Post the facts of his " average play"

The guy thinks Cousins is average and Alex is great.

http://img2.thejournal.ie/inline/230...ersion=2303357

BIG K 03-10-2017 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 12777285)
I wouldn't get too worked up for a QB in the 1st people
I think it's next year.
You are just gonna piss yourselves off and we will have another Geno Smith situation.
It's not fun.

It's always next year......I don't remember a time when the Chiefs interviewed six rookie QB's pre-draft since I started following in 1990, but I could be wrong.
No, I think they are gunning for AS replacement in 2018. Whether it all works is an entirely different story..

Trent Green GOAT 03-11-2017 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12778571)
He's averaged below 4 fumbles per season in KC and that's considering he's a dual threat QB. And not all of those were lost fumbles. Fact.

A dual "threat"....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.