I agree. That game really disappointed me. I loved the idea, deplored the execution.

sometimes when companies try soething a little new, they fall short. Hopefully they learned on what works and what didnt and the next one they make better. There will be a Watchdogs 2. they made a shitload of money.

The second one won't pull the early numbers nearly as much but if they improve the product, it'll be ok.

It can pull the same numbers if more, if they make a good game, you make a good game and get reviewers to hype the game. People will buy it. People want good games. With UBI pushing it. NO problem as long as the game is good.

Loved LA Noire. Didn't have much replay value after completion, but I loved the story.

Yeah, the story was good, but like Gonzo said, I didn't really like the execution and the gameplay...

The gameplay gets repetitive on LA Noire, but I found the interrogation much better after reading this:

The interrogation options in the game are mislabelled. In the game a witness or suspects makes a statement and then you are given the options "Truth, Doubt or Lie" and the game tells you to pick one based on how trustworthy you think they are. This is wrong. The game was developed and the dialogue recorded with these options called "Coax, Force or Lie" with coax meaning you try to gently pry for information and force meaning you get shouty with them. This is why you see so many people online confused about why the detective in the game suddenly goes ballistic. Knowing this makes the dialogue system make a lot more sense.

LMAO

Sorry man this game wasn't very well received and I haven't even played it yet. Glad you like it though.

This game would've been so much better with T Bone as the lead.