ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs So, how do you guys react if the Walrus waits to pick a QB until later rounds (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268599)

King_Chief_Fan 01-07-2013 06:52 PM

So, how do you guys react if the Walrus waits to pick a QB until later rounds
 
How many of you who think Clark hired the right guy will be spitting nails if the Walrus waits until round 2-3 to draft a QB? How many will be shouting you stupid M -F? How many will want his head on a stick?

Fritz88 01-07-2013 06:53 PM

I'd be a little pissed but he does have a track record with developing QBs and giving that position high priority
Posted via Mobile Device

jd1020 01-07-2013 06:54 PM

Same shit different drivers.

O.city 01-07-2013 06:54 PM

We have the first overall pick, take the best QB prospect available.

Buehler445 01-07-2013 06:55 PM

http://larryarbuckle.files.wordpress...1/12/image.jpg

the Talking Can 01-07-2013 06:55 PM

you mean if we do what we've been doing for 30 years?

i'll be thrilled like all true fans

King_Chief_Fan 01-07-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9293488)

:huh:

HolyHat 01-07-2013 06:56 PM

It's not going to happen. As long as Geno shows at the combine that he is better than everyone else he will be our QB. Reid will probably still bring in another guy to compete though.

Dayze 01-07-2013 06:57 PM

I'll be fine if we don't take one 1 overall as long as we trade back into the 1st to get one.

keg in kc 01-07-2013 06:57 PM

By that time, we'll have likely had a new QB on the roster for 6 weeks, and will have known long before the draft begins who we're taking at #1. So while I will be (very) disappointed I doubt I'll be all that angry.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-07-2013 06:57 PM

The only QB I'd be remotely close to being "okay" with in late rounds is Tyler Bray.

Mike in SW-MO 01-07-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9293488)

Dude would look s lot nuttier if the gun wasn't on half -cock.

jd1020 01-07-2013 06:58 PM

If it turns out that he doesn't think Geno or some other top prospect can get shit done and someone like Bray tops his list then w/e.

But if he passes on his top QB at #1 because that QB "isn't worth the #1 pick" then I'll flip the switch.

dirk digler 01-07-2013 06:58 PM

Why would they do something that stupid? You have the #1 pick in the draft you take the best QB period

Easy 6 01-07-2013 06:59 PM

His leash goes well beyond the back yard with me, he'll have to go hard after jason campbell, matt flynn or some other turdburger before i get a hairlip.

This guy KNOWS what its all about, he isnt going to settle for anyone who isnt able to do everything he needs them to do, able to make all of the big throws that his downfield attack requires.

Thats the biggest thrill of this hire, he needs a damn good quarterback to execute his scheme... yeah, so he whiffed on vick, but it didnt look like it at first, he had that guy chucking lasers ALL over the field in 2010.

Strongside 01-07-2013 07:00 PM

Fired.

BigRedChief 01-07-2013 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 9293481)
I'd be a little pissed but he does have a track record with developing QBs and giving that position high priority
Posted via Mobile Device

THIS!
I've been supporting taking a QB with the #1 pick. Identify your QOTF and take him #1, **** draft value. Why risk someone jumping in front of you and taking your QOTF?

But now with Reid safely in place. I trust Reid will get us a top NFL QB. It's a part of who he is, how he runs a team. He will GIT-R-DONE!

KC_Lee 01-07-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9293499)
The only QB I'd be remotely close to being "okay" with in late rounds is Tyler Bray.

I could go for this as well. If Bray dropped to the 2nd round and we picked him up there I would not be too heartbroken.

Strongside 01-07-2013 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 9293513)
His leash goes well beyond the back yard with me, he'll have to go hard after jason campbell, matt flynn or some other turdburger before i get a hairlip.

This guy KNOWS what its all about, he isnt going to settle for anyone who isnt able to do everything he needs them to do, able to make all of the big throws that his downfield attack requires.

Thats the biggest thrill of this hire, he needs a damn good quarterback to execute his scheme... yeah, so he whiffed on vick, but it didnt look like it at first, he had that guy chucking lasers ALL over the field in 2010.

Vicks big issue is his health I think. He can't stay on the field long enough to develop any kind of consistency anymore. Other than being consistently hurt & inaccurate.

BigRedChief 01-07-2013 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9293508)
Why would they do something that stupid? You have the #1 pick in the draft you take the best QB period

My opinion is that if Reid see's his QOTF in some SEC QB that will go in the 2nd round I'll not be pissed. I guess its just trust given his background that he will get us a top QB.

hometeam 01-07-2013 07:06 PM

I'll be pissed. More of the same.

Easy 6 01-07-2013 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9293533)
Vicks big issue is his health I think. He can't stay on the field long enough to develop any kind of consistency anymore. Other than being consistently hurt & inaccurate.

Yep, cant stay healthy and sucks at reading a defense, the second part really caught up to him in 2011.

farmerchief 01-07-2013 07:08 PM

I'm cool with that, as I have to believe he will pick up a valuable QB, somewhere in the draft:thumb:

MahiMike 01-07-2013 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9293483)
We have the first overall pick, take the best QB prospect available.

I don't understand why everyone thinks it's one or the other. To me, it's both. There's not currently a QB on this team. Andy will get Alex Smith AND draft a QBOTF.

jd1020 01-07-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9293561)
I don't understand why everyone thinks it's one or the other. To me, it's both. There's not currently a QB on this team. Andy will get Alex Smith AND draft a QBOTF.

Why would he trade for Alex Smith?

I'd rather keep Stanzi and let him rot on the inactive roster than waste picks to trade for ****ing Alex Smith.

the Talking Can 01-07-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9293564)
Why would he trade for Alex Smith?

because other teams can draft and play rookies, but no us...

dirk digler 01-07-2013 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9293536)
My opinion is that if Reid see's his QOTF in some SEC QB that will go in the 2nd round I'll not be pissed. I guess its just trust given his background that he will get us a top QB.

Yeah I don't think so....

There will probably be 3-4 QB's taken in the first round like there is every year

okcchief 01-07-2013 07:18 PM

I trust Reid. I'm going to roll with that until he proves me wrong. I hope it's a QB, but his evaluation is better than any of ours.

Thig Lyfe 01-07-2013 07:20 PM

WHY WAIT AND SEE

FIRE REID NOW

Setsuna 01-07-2013 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9293523)
I could go for this as well. If Bray dropped to the 2nd round and we picked him up there I would not be too heartbroken.

Not going to happen.

Dayze 01-07-2013 07:21 PM

yeah; if the highest ranked QB after it's all said and done is said to go in the 20's, then they must know something I don't. in that case, take who you want 1, then get back into the 1st.

MahiMike 01-07-2013 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9293564)
Why would he trade for Alex Smith?

I'd rather keep Stanzi and let him rot on the inactive roster than waste picks to trade for ****ing Alex Smith.

um, because we want to WIN! Duh!

dirk digler 01-07-2013 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9293592)
I trust Reid. I'm going to roll with that until he proves me wrong. I hope it's a QB, but his evaluation is better than any of ours.

I said the same thing about Pioli. Not playing that game anymore homey.

WV 01-07-2013 07:23 PM

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-conte...imma-cut-u.gif

jd1020 01-07-2013 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9293609)
um, because we want to WIN! Duh!

And we are going to win by trading for a backup QB?

This fanbase...

htismaqe 01-07-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9293564)
Why would he trade for Alex Smith?

I'd rather keep Stanzi and let him rot on the inactive roster than waste picks to trade for ****ing Alex Smith.

Exactly. Just get a free agent.

Red Dawg 01-07-2013 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9293508)
Why would they do something that stupid? You have the #1 pick in the draft you take the best QB period

I agree. Its the only position worth the one pick and we need a qb sooooooo bad we have too.

KCUnited 01-07-2013 07:27 PM

It would be strike one unless he does something equally as stupid prior to the draft.

Easy 6 01-07-2013 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 9293603)
WHY WAIT AND SEE

FIRE REID NOW

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

Dayze 01-07-2013 07:28 PM

not trying to flame or anything; but serious question.
what if the best rated QB is slated to go at #20 or later; do you take him #1?

htismaqe 01-07-2013 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9293645)
not trying to flame or anything; but serious question.
what if the best rated QB is slated to go at #20 or later; do you take him #1?

That's happened like never.

Dayze 01-07-2013 07:32 PM

ok; Ill rephrase; whats the furthest down in the first round where a qb is ranked would be too much of a reach etc.
10? 15? etc.

just curious. for me, it would be outside of 5-8.

seclark 01-07-2013 07:36 PM

Ok...a lot of this depends on how fire me boy's bacon turns out.
Sec

ChiefsCountry 01-07-2013 07:38 PM

First year in Green Bay, they traded a first for Brett Favre. His first year in Philadelphia, they drafted Donovan McNabb 2nd overall. I think they are drafting a quarterback.

Bump 01-07-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9293478)
How many of you who think Clark hired the right guy will be spitting nails if the Walrus waits until round 2-3 to draft a QB? How many will be shouting you stupid M -F? How many will want his head on a stick?

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/...psc14e00fa.gif

BigCatDaddy 01-07-2013 07:42 PM

Reid is not a dumb mother ****er like Pioli so I know I don't have to worry about that happening.

RealSNR 01-07-2013 07:42 PM

Also, Reid hasn't had recent success with middle round picks necessarily.

Kevin Kolb sucks.

Nick Foles sucks even more.

Best way to ensure not getting one of those two? Go FIRST ROUND with your QB. Take the best guy.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 01-07-2013 07:43 PM

I would rather have Reid and a second rounder. Than Pioli, RGIII and revolving third rate HCs and OCs.

The_Doctor10 01-07-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9293703)
First year in Green Bay, they traded a first for Brett Favre. His first year in Philadelphia, they drafted Donovan McNabb 2nd overall. I think they are drafting a quarterback.

You silly bitch, how dare you make sense.

The_Doctor10 01-07-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9293730)
Also, Reid hasn't had recent success with middle round picks necessarily.

Kevin Kolb sucks.

Nick Foles sucks even more.

Best way to ensure not getting one of those two? Go FIRST ROUND with your QB. Take the best guy.

If Kolb weren't made of obsidian he'd be a middle of the road qb at worst.

Rain Man 01-07-2013 07:52 PM

I will doctor potatoes to look like hand grenades and then throw them at his office if he does not select a quarterback with the first pick.

This assumes of course that all of the elite prospects don't have accidents with antifreeze, aids trees, Jovan Belcher, or other natural hazards between now and the draft.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 07:52 PM

If Reid waits until the 2nd or 3rd, that guy better start immediately and succeed soon after.

Deberg_1990 01-07-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9293491)
you mean if we do what we've been doing for 30 years?

i'll be thrilled like all true fans

You can find franchise QBs in the lower rounds....Montana, Brady, Russell Wilson.

hometeam 01-07-2013 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9293863)
You can find franchise QBs in the lower rounds....Montana, Brady, Russell Wilson.

Russel Wilson remains to be seen if he is a true franchise QB. Montana and Brady are the exceptions, not the rule. Brady was pure fluke, as far as where he was drafted to what he became.

The rule is that franchise QBs come in the first round, most in the top side of rd1 if not #1 overall.

Sure there are misses.

This is from 2009 but it still illustrates my point. In fact you could argue since 09 the balance is skewed more to QB favor...

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftqu...ckriskmyth.php

Quote:

Quarterbacks:

There were 29 quarterbacks selected in the top 16 of the NFL Draft since 1993...

Hits: 13
Busts: 12
OK: 2
TBA: 2

Defensive Tackles:

There were 33 defensive tackles selected in the top 16 of the NFL Draft since 1993...

Hits: 15
Busts: 15
OK: 2
TBA: 1

Now, let's look at the hit and bust rates for each position:

Quarterback Hit Rate: 48.2%
Defensive Tackle Hit Rate: 46.9%

Quarterback Bust Rate: 44.4%
Defensive Tackle Bust Rate: 46.9%
So what does this really show? Its a close hit/bust rate on QBs? Yes. But pay attention. 50% Hit rate, thats a good QB. You have a 50% shot at a franchise guy. TAKE IT. Don't be stupid Clark! Quit being a pussy and go for the gold~


edit - another nice tidbit.

Quote:

It's a small sample size, but the disparity is even larger in the top five. In that area, only one defensive tackle has panned out of five opportunities, whereas five of 10 quarterbacks have been "hits," and only four of 10 quarterbacks have been busts.

Considering how important the quarterback is in relation to the defensive tackle, if a team is deciding between the two positions, the "risk" factor should not sway them away from taking a signal-caller. In fact, it's actually riskier to take a defensive tackle.


***

One more thing - I wanted to see how these two positions translated into winning and losing on the football field. I took all of the "hit" players listed in the two tables, and looked up how their initial franchise fared while they were on the roster:

Hit Quarterback Original Team Record: 828-593 (.583)
Hit Quarterback Average Years on Original Team: 6.9
Hit Quarterback Average Playoff Years on Original Team: 3.8

Hit Defensive Tackle Original Team Record: 966-745 (.565)
Hit Defensive Tackle Average Years on Original Team: 6.4
Hit Defensive Tackle Average Playoff Years on Original Team: 3.1

No one should be shocked that teams with hit quarterbacks were more successful than teams with hit defensive tackles. I actually thought there would be more of a disparity until I realized that the numbers are skewed; after all, did the Patriots win three Super Bowls because of Richard Seymour and Ty Warren (two of the hit defensive tackles that affected these numbers), or because of Tom Brady? Brady is the correct answer just in case you have Bucky Brooks Syndrome and inexplicably hate quarterbacks.

At any rate, I'm going to look into the hit and bust rates of the other positions soon. But with all of these facts and numbers in mind, hopefully the notion of taking a quarterback won't be seen as risky too much longer. In fact, the real risk is passing up on a franchise quarterback.

Spott 01-07-2013 08:07 PM

I'll get a banner.

Brock 01-07-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9293863)
You can find franchise QBs in the lower rounds....Montana, Brady, Russell Wilson.

LMAO

Deberg_1990 01-07-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9293974)
Russel Wilson remains to be seen if he is a true franchise QB. Montana and Brady are the exceptions, not the rule. Brady was pure fluke, as far as where he was drafted to what he became.

The rule is that franchise QBs come in the first round, most in the top side of rd1 if not #1 overall.

Sure there are misses.

This is from 2009 but it still illustrates my point. In fact you could argue since 09 the balance is skewed more to QB favor...

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftqu...ckriskmyth.php



So what does this really show? Its a close hit/bust rate on QBs? Yes. But pay attention. 50% Hit rate, thats a good QB. You have a 50% shot at a franchise guy. TAKE IT. Don't be stupid Clark! Quit being a pussy and go for the gold~



Save your 1s and 0s dude. I'm trolliin

Captain Obvious 01-07-2013 08:11 PM

My prediction: #1 BAA and then trade up into late first round to take the QB.

Mecca 01-07-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Obvious (Post 9294022)
My prediction: #1 BAA and then trade up into late first round to take the QB.

So your plan is Tyler Bray?
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe 01-07-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Obvious (Post 9294022)
My prediction: #1 BAA and then trade up into late first round to take the QB.

Who is the BAA?

RealSNR 01-07-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294054)
Who is the BAA?

MANTI TE'O

Errp uhh...

Barrett Jones?

splatbass 01-07-2013 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9293568)
because other teams can draft and play rookies, but no us...

Do you want to win, or do you just want to emulate other teams?

If we win I don't give a shit if it is like other teams or not. As long as we win.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9294107)
Do you want to win, or do you just want to emulate other teams?

If we win I don't give a shit if it is like other teams or not. As long as we win.

Those other teams are winning. Take a look at the rosters of the playoff teams.

If you think this is about anything OTHER than winning, you haven't been paying attention.

el borracho 01-07-2013 08:23 PM

If we pass on a QB in the first round I will probably have an atypically bad initial reaction. Depending on Reid's solution to the problem, I may get over it. If we somehow do not draft a QB in the first three rounds, I will not even watch the games (just as I didn't bother watching the games this year).

splatbass 01-07-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294125)
Those other teams are winning. Take a look at the rosters of the playoff teams.

If you think this is about anything OTHER than winning, you haven't been paying attention.

It seems like TC and some others are jealous of what other teams are doing and want to emulate them exactly. That is fine, but frankly I don't care how we win as long as we win. If we do it with a 1st RD pick or we do it with a 6th RD like Brady what the **** does it matter?

Reid has a good history with QBs. I trust him to get the right one, however he chooses to do it. I don't need to try to be like the cool kids. I just want to win.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9294193)
It seems like TC and some others are jealous of what other teams are doing and want to emulate them exactly. That is fine, but frankly I don't care how we win as long as we win. If we do it with a 1st RD pick or we do it with a 6th RD like Brady what the **** does it matter?

Reid has a good history with QBs. I trust him to get the right one, however he chooses to do it. I don't need to try to be like the cool kids. I just want to win.

The thing is, winning with a 6th rounder like Brady is a once-in-a-generation occurrence.

Why do we want to draft a QB? Because history tells us it gives us the highest probability of WINNING.

FlaChief58 01-07-2013 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9293478)
How many of you who think Clark hired the right guy will be spitting nails if the Walrus waits until round 2-3 to draft a QB? How many will be shouting you stupid M -F? How many will want his head on a stick?

I trust him a lot more than I would if pioli were making that pick

splatbass 01-07-2013 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294233)
The thing is, winning with a 6th rounder like Brady is a once-in-a-generation occurrence.

Why do we want to draft a QB? Because history tells us it gives us the highest probability of WINNING.

I would like for us to draft a 1st RD QB. But I trust Reid to find QB and as long as he wins I don't care where he gets the QB. It isn't about the process for me, it is about the RESULT.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9294282)
I would like for us to draft a 1st RD QB. But I trust Reid to find QB and as long as he wins I don't care where he gets the QB. It isn't about the process for me, it is about the RESULT.

The ONLY reason it's about the process for me is because recent NFL history is undeniable. Chiefs history is undeniable.

The way to win is to get the QB, period. Doing anything else is just fighting a an uphill battle.

splatbass 01-07-2013 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294332)
The ONLY reason it's about the process for me is because recent NFL history is undeniable. Chiefs history is undeniable.

The way to win is to get the QB, period. Doing anything else is just fighting a an uphill battle.

Yes, the way to win is to get the QB. How you get that QB isn't as important as getting him to me. Clearly it is to you.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9294477)
Yes, the way to win is to get the QB. How you get that QB isn't as important as getting him to me. Clearly it is to you.

Tom Brady happens once in, well...FOREVER.

It absolutely matters how you get your QB.

splatbass 01-07-2013 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294516)
Tom Brady happens once in, well...FOREVER.

It absolutely matters how you get your QB.

No, it doesn't. As long as you get the QB you need. Taking an inferior QB in the first round just because you desperately want a first round QB when you can get a better one another way just wouldn't make sense (not saying that is the way it will be, this is a hypothetical).

For some of you it is about the process - being like the cool kids - instead of the result.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9294550)
No, it doesn't. As long as you get the QB you need. Taking an inferior QB in the first round just because you desperately want a first round QB when you can get a better one another way just wouldn't make sense (not saying that is the way it will be, this is a hypothetical).

For some of you it is about the process - being like the cool kids - instead of the result.

Yeah, you just like to act like a ****ing girl as usual.

****ing "cool kids" bush league bullshit.

Should have known you were baiting. Grow up.

The Rick 01-07-2013 09:26 PM

In The Walrus I Trust.

Seriously, it feels so good to have a legit coach and what looks like it will be a legit front office and coaching staff, not to mention an owner who decided after last season's abomination that he (and we) deserved better and went in to beast mode, that I'm ready to give them all the benefit of the doubt for a couple of years.

Red Dawg 01-07-2013 09:31 PM

Tajh boyd is this years russell wilson. Snatch him in the third if he declares. I still hope for geno.

HonestChieffan 01-07-2013 09:31 PM

Cool. But we need a suicide watch for all the people here who think Geno hung the moon. He is an Ok Qb. But Id bet the new guy is looking beyond an Ok Qb. Its 50/50 at best we get Geno.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 9294676)
Tajh boyd is this years russell wilson. Snatch him in the third if he declares. I still hope for geno.

Have you ever seen Tajh Boyd play?

The comparison to Russell Wilson is about as far off as you can get.

splatbass 01-07-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9294588)
Yeah, you just like to act like a ****ing girl as usual.

****ing "cool kids" bush league bullshit.

Should have known you were baiting. Grow up.

Yeah, blah blah, aids tree, anti-freeze blah blah.

I am an adult, that is why I feel no need to be cool. If you want to be a child be my guest.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-07-2013 09:46 PM

@mr_tomahawk
@Jacobs71 after reids QB comments 2day, u think we pass on a 1st rnd qb?

Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71
@mr_tomahawk I don't think he will reach. That's for sure.

DonkyPuncher 01-07-2013 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike in SW-MO (Post 9293501)
Dude would look s lot nuttier if the gun wasn't on half -cock.

if its a double action it doesn't matter


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.