ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Bucs not planning to extend Josh Freeman (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268578)

shitgoose 01-07-2013 08:18 AM

Bucs not planning to extend Josh Freeman
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...mans-contract/

According to Rick Stroud of the Tampa Bay Times, the Bucs won’t be extending Freeman’s contract, which expires after the 2013 season. And as Stroud explains it, the decision not to sign Freeman to a new deal could be part of a plan by coach Greg Schiano, who inherited Freeman, to get his own quarterback. And Freeman may change Schiano’s mind only by playing so well this season that Freeman leaves the Bucs with no other option than to use the franchise tag or sign him to a long-term deal.

One possibility would be to apply the non-exclusive tag and to see if anyone is willing to sign Freeman to an offer sheet and give up a pair of first-round picks. That would enable the Bucs to pull a reverse Keyshawn, giving up a player and getting two first-round picks 14 years after they gave up two first-round picks to get Keyshawn Johnson from the Jets.

The Bucs likely would settle for less, since the alternative will be to let Freeman walk away.

shitgoose 01-07-2013 08:19 AM

Sign me up. Guy is from KC and only 24 years old.

AussieChiefsFan 01-07-2013 08:20 AM

:hmmm:

Mr. Flopnuts 01-07-2013 08:22 AM

Wow. This one intrigues me.

Mother****erJones 01-07-2013 08:22 AM

Hmmm..maybe he's a trade option for KC. Sign me up for a 2nd rounder

Deberg_1990 01-07-2013 08:22 AM

He strikes as pretty meh.....

Red And Yellow 01-07-2013 08:23 AM

Freeman is a decent QB, from the KC area too if I remember right?

Brock 01-07-2013 08:24 AM

Quote:

see if anyone is willing to sign Freeman to an offer sheet and give up a pair of first-round picks.
Ha ha, right.

FlaChief58 01-07-2013 08:24 AM

I'd still want them to draft a QBOTF but, there's a move I could live with

Molitoth 01-07-2013 08:25 AM

Meh. I would NOT be impressed with him as a #1 option unless Geno Smith/Tyler Wilson was competing with him for the starting job. This would create some good competition and leave us with a good backup.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:28 AM

ROFL

Dudes been mediocre at best and the Chiefs have the #1 pick to get their own QB and some people are drooling over this kid to be a Chief.

NO!

Al Bundy 01-07-2013 08:29 AM

There is a reason we have not extended him. His footwork is poor and he has some accuracy "issues".

007 01-07-2013 08:29 AM

Not for 2 first round picks. No way.

Pushead2 01-07-2013 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291223)
ROFL

Dudes been mediocre at best and the Chiefs have the #1 pick to get their own QB and some people are drooling over this kid to be a Chief.

NO!

Drafting Geno & getting Freeman > Cassel, Quinn & Stanzi.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pushead2 (Post 9291227)
Drafting Geno & getting Freeman > Cassel, Quinn & Stanzi.

Drafting Geno and not wasting picks to trade for Freeman > Drafting Geno and trading for Freeman.

Imon Yourside 01-07-2013 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9291225)
Not for 2 first round picks. No way.

Stole my wording exactly, as a FA maybe but no way to that.

shitgoose 01-07-2013 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291223)
ROFL

Dudes been mediocre at best and the Chiefs have the #1 pick to get their own QB and some people are drooling over this kid to be a Chief.

NO!

#1 pick in a draft that most people would agree is weak at the top, specifically at the QB position.

Deberg_1990 01-07-2013 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 9291224)
There is a reason we have not extended him. His footwork is poor and he has some accuracy "issues".

The most important thing is, he doesnt appear to much of a winner.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291230)
#1 pick in a draft that most people would agree is weak at the top, specifically at the QB position.

What's your point?

You think the Buccaneers aren't extending Freeman because he's a great QB and to do the Chiefs a favor?

Mother****erJones 01-07-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9291212)
Ha ha, right.

ROFL Best joke ive hear in a long time!

Dave Lane 01-07-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9291215)
Meh. I would NOT be impressed with him as a #1 option unless Geno Smith/Tyler Wilson was competing with him for the starting job. This would create some good competition and leave us with a good backup.

This. A 3rd going to a 2nd with playing time in 2014 would be nice for Freeman.

KC kid 01-07-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291228)
Drafting Geno and not wasting picks to trade for Freeman > Drafting Geno and trading for Freeman.

Trading a 2nd for Freeman is way too much. The reason they are going to be parting ways with him is he is just not very good. You do not give up anything more than a 4th or 5th for him

Mother****erJones 01-07-2013 08:35 AM

Im not drooling over the kid. But if we could give up a 3rd or maybe a 2nd then you gota entertain it.

Mother****erJones 01-07-2013 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 9291238)
Trading a 2nd for Freeman is way too much. The reason they are going to be parting ways with him is he is just not very good. You do not give up anything more than a 4th or 5th for him

Youre right i was just throwing some picks around. If we could give up a 4th this year and a conditional pick next year. Id go for it

FlaChief58 01-07-2013 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291223)
ROFL

Dudes been mediocre at best and the Chiefs have the #1 pick to get their own QB and some people are drooling over this kid to be a Chief.

NO!

We're going to need at least 2 new QBs and everyone agrees that one of them should be a vet. Freeman is no Montanna but, he's not Jafatass either. He would be a hell of a backup and could start a few games if needed. If you could get him at a reasonable price I really dont see a problem with it

CaliforniaChief 01-07-2013 08:37 AM

In a QB-driven league, when a team doesn't extend a 24 year old QB who was drafted in the first round, you've got to wonder if it's buyer beware.

AussieChiefsFan 01-07-2013 08:37 AM

For a 4th. As a backup to Geno/whoever we draft, Id be happy to have him.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:38 AM

I'll take FA Jason Campbell or Matt Moore and save the 3rd/4th round pick, thank you.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 08:41 AM

We should not be giving up picks for ANYBODY.

If a team is willing to part with a player, whether it's Cousins, Flynn, or Freeman, there's a REASON for it.

Sign a FREE agent and keep our picks.

King_Chief_Fan 01-07-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 9291242)
We're going to need at least 2 new QBs and everyone agrees that one of them should be a vet. Freeman is no Montanna but, he's not Jafatass either. He would be a hell of a backup and could start a few games if needed. If you could get him at a reasonable price I really dont see a problem with it

well, he is better than Stanzi and Stanzi will need to be replaced so if he will be happy taking the 3rd spot on the depth chart to see if he can improve his position...ok

ChiliConCarnage 01-07-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

One possibility would be to apply the non-exclusive tag and to see if anyone is willing to sign Freeman to an offer sheet and give up a pair of first-round picks.
I wonder how hard he laughed after writing that

Pooch 01-07-2013 08:44 AM

I think it is crazy that half the people on this site act like Geno is bust proof. I wonder what they know that none of the scouts that do this for a living don't?

FlaChief58 01-07-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9291253)
well, he is better than Stanzi and Stanzi will need to be replaced so if he will be happy taking the 3rd spot on the depth chart to see if he can improve his position...ok

A guy like this is right in Reid's wheelhouse. With some quality coaching, Freeman should improve

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pooch (Post 9291258)
I think it is crazy that half the people on this site act like Geno is bust proof. I wonder what they know that none of the scouts that do this for a living don't?

I think Geno is so bust proof I want the Chiefs to draft 2 QBs this year while signing Jason Campbell or Matt Moore.

shitgoose 01-07-2013 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291235)
What's your point?

You think the Buccaneers aren't extending Freeman because he's a great QB and to do the Chiefs a favor?

My point is I don't think there is a great QB to be had in the draft. I know Geno is god around here but let's not pretend he's a proven commodity.

Secondly, if you read the article you might have noticed it mentioned that Schiano might be looking for his own guy. If he and Freeman are not a good match than Freeman moves on. You can't deny this guy has talent. Not saying he is Aaron Rodgers and Terry Bradshaws love child or anything but he's 20x the QB the Chiefs have had in the last 5 years.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291263)
My point is I don't think there is a great QB to be had in the draft. I know Geno is god around here but let's not pretend he's a proven commodity.

Secondly, if you read the article you might have noticed it mentioned that Schiano might be looking for his own guy. If he and Freeman are not a good match than Freeman moves on. You can't deny this guy has talent. Not saying he is Aaron Rodgers and Terry Bradshaws love child or anything but he's 20x the QB the Chiefs have had in the last 5 years.

Tebow has talent. He's just not very good.

Jets are taking offers.

TheGuardian 01-07-2013 08:49 AM

God no. Next.

shitgoose 01-07-2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291265)
Tebow has talent. He's just not very good.

Jets are taking offers.

You're right. Forget Freeman, Matt Moore/Jason Campbell FTW!!!!!ROFL

Geno is bust proof!!!LMAO

Iowanian 01-07-2013 08:52 AM

He was decent as a rookie but has pretty much sucked the past 2 seasons.

If a 24 year old 1st rounder with 3 years experience is being shopped, it's not because the team likes his upside.

Better than what we have now, but not the answer IMO.

hawkchief 01-07-2013 08:54 AM

Absolutely no thanks. We've had enough stiffs around here, no need for another one.

Next.

jd1020 01-07-2013 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291268)
You're right. Forget Freeman, Matt Moore/Jason Campbell FTW!!!!!ROFL

Geno is bust proof!!!LMAO

Yes, because not wanting to trade for a once first round pick that is already being shown the door before his rookie deal expires means Geno is bust proof.

God this fan base is stupid.

BigMeatballDave 01-07-2013 08:59 AM

I wanna see Clay's reaction to this... :D

jd1020 01-07-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9291285)
I wanna see Clay's reaction to this... :D

PFF is going to show us how Freeman is better than Cassel and Quinn.

-King- 01-07-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291263)
My point is I don't think there is a great QB to be had in the draft. I know Geno is god around here but let's not pretend he's a proven commodity.

Secondly, if you read the article you might have noticed it mentioned that Schiano might be looking for his own guy. If he and Freeman are not a good match than Freeman moves on. You can't deny this guy has talent. Not saying he is Aaron Rodgers and Terry Bradshaws love child or anything but he's 20x the QB the Chiefs have had in the last 5 years.

Cant deny Brady Quinn's talent either.

And who the **** cares if hes better than the qbs we've had lately. 75% of the qbs in the league fit that description. It doesn't take much to be better than them.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 01-07-2013 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9291208)
Hmmm..maybe he's a trade option for KC. Sign me up for a 2nd rounder

Hell ****ing no...

BigMeatballDave 01-07-2013 09:04 AM

I'd like Freeman if he were a FA.

2 firsts? LMAO

Al Bundy 01-07-2013 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 9291269)
He was decent as a rookie but has pretty much sucked the past 2 seasons.

If a 24 year old 1st rounder with 3 years experience is being shopped, it's not because the team likes his upside.

Better than what we have now, but not the answer IMO.

He was good in his second year, but 2011 was a trainwreck and the last month of last season he was below average. However, in his defense the entire team struggled.

shitgoose 01-07-2013 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291271)
Yes, because not wanting to trade for a once first round pick that is already being shown the door before his rookie deal expires means Geno is bust proof.

God this fan base is stupid.

But drafting two qb's and pinning you hopes for the 2013 season on Jason Campbell/Matt Moore is much smarter than drafting one qb and trading a mid-round pick for a 24 year old first rd qb who won 10 games his first full year starting and posted the below numbers.

2010 TB 16 291 474 61.4 3,451 7.3 25 6 95.9

RealSNR 01-07-2013 09:05 AM

Yeah this kind of thing ALWAYS works out in the NFL... :rolleyes:

GENO ISN'T A SURE THING GUYS

Yeah, I'm sure that's what the Bears said when they traded for Cutler

jd1020 01-07-2013 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291303)
But drafting two qb's and pinning you hopes for the 2013 season on Jason Campbell/Matt Moore is much smarter than drafting one qb and trading a mid-round pick for a 24 year old first rd qb who won 10 games his first full year starting and posted the below numbers is idiotic.

Who the **** said we were going to pin our hopes on Jason Campbell or Matt Moore. They would be the backup you dumbass.

I heard Matt Cassel put up a good stat line one year too. We should keep him!

shitgoose 01-07-2013 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291310)
Who the **** said we were going to pin our hopes on Jason Campbell or Matt Moore. They would be the backup you dumbass.

I heard Matt Cassel put up a good stat line one year too. We should keep him!

I'm not suggesting we sign Freeman to a 6/$60M dollar deal you ****ing idiot. I think we should take a flyer on Freeman for a mid-round pick. I want this football team to upgrade the QB position anyway possible. Drafting a QB at #1 isn't enough. Freeman is young and talented. He has more upside than any qb you will take in the mid rounds of this draft IMO.

jd1020 01-07-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291339)
I'm not suggesting we sign Freeman to a 6/$60M dollar deal you ****ing idiot. I think we should take a flyer on Freeman for a mid-round pick. I want this football team to upgrade the QB position anyway possible. Drafting a QB at #1 isn't enough. Freeman is young and talented. He has more upside than any qb you will take in the mid rounds of this draft IMO.

And I never said you were suggesting signing Freeman to a $60M deal you dumbass.

He doesn't have more upside than mid round QBs in this draft because he's as talented as a mid round pick and he's shown what he can do in the NFL and its NOT GOOD.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291271)
Yes, because not wanting to trade for a once first round pick that is already being shown the door before his rookie deal expires means Geno is bust proof.

God this fan base is stupid.

:clap::clap::clap:

RealSNR 01-07-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291339)
I'm not suggesting we sign Freeman to a 6/$60M dollar deal you ****ing idiot. I think we should take a flyer on Freeman for a mid-round pick. I want this football team to upgrade the QB position anyway possible. Drafting a QB at #1 isn't enough. Freeman is young and talented. He has more upside than any qb you will take in the mid rounds of this draft IMO.

Agreed.

So take a QB in the first round of the draft instead.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 9291339)
I think we should take a flyer on Freeman for a mid-round pick.

NO. NO. **** NO.

We need EVERY pick we have. Get a FREE AGENT.

Easy 6 01-07-2013 09:17 AM

I'd take this guy in a HEARTBEAT, he's EXACTLY the kind of big, physical pocket passer i prefer.

Guys like that arent nearly as afraid to step into pressure, they can make throws with guys hanging all over them and are much harder to sack... give him intense coaching and guidance and look out.

I would LOVE it, take a young hotshot #1 and let'em fight it out.

LiveSteam 01-07-2013 09:17 AM

Do not bring him in for a look
I repeat
Do not bring him in for a look

houstonwhodat 01-07-2013 09:17 AM

Keep looking.

He is not your answer.

As much as Andy Reid likes to throw you need to find the next Brees, Brady, Manning or Rodgers.

I have no idea who in the hell that is though.

Dante84 01-07-2013 09:18 AM

QB in the first, and snag Freeman for the correct price (not two firsts).

Regarding Freeman's upside, I would defer to Reid. Freeman has shown some awesome flashes, and also sucked a lot of ass. Maybe its a correctable thing, maybe its not.

But again, I would defer to Reid's QB knowledge.

WhiteWhale 01-07-2013 09:19 AM

I suggest a good number of you read the goddamn article to avoid confusion.

The bucs aren't releasing him. He won't be a FA this off-season.

They're going to make him play out his contract. After seeing what he does next season they'll make a decision to re sign him, let him walk, or franchise him. They're just not extending him NOW.

Reading is fundamental folks.

jd1020 01-07-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9291365)
I suggest a good number of you read the goddamn article to avoid confusion.

The bucs aren't releasing him. He won't be a FA this off-season.

They're going to make him play out his contract. After seeing what he does next season they'll make a decision to re sign him, let him walk, or franchise him. They're just not extending him NOW.

Reading is fundamental folks.

Thats not what the article suggests at all.

That is the writers opinion.

Comprehension is fundamental.

BigMeatballDave 01-07-2013 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9291365)
I suggest a good number of you read the goddamn article to avoid confusion.

The bucs aren't releasing him. He won't be a FA this off-season.

They're going to make him play out his contract. After seeing what he does next season they'll make a decision to re sign him, let him walk, or franchise him. They're just not extending him NOW.

Reading is fundamental folks.

Uh, yeah. We know. These threads are designed for discussion.

Mostly, no one here would trade for him.

Dante84 01-07-2013 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9291365)
I suggest a good number of you read the goddamn article to avoid confusion.

The bucs aren't releasing him. He won't be a FA this off-season.

They're going to make him play out his contract. After seeing what he does next season they'll make a decision to re sign him, let him walk, or franchise him. They're just not extending him NOW.

Reading is fundamental folks.

I think its safe to assume they wouldn't leak this information if they weren't trying to create some trade hype.

WhiteWhale 01-07-2013 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9291368)
Thats not what the article suggests at all.

That is the writers opinion.

Comprehension is fundamental.

Freeman's contract status is NOT an opinion.

It expires after 2013, not 2012. He won't be a FA this offseason. People need to stop acting like he's an option this off-season. He won't be.

A lot of people aren't talking about him in trade manner. You don't 'bring him in for a look' when you trade for a guy. That's FA talk.

HemiEd 01-07-2013 09:26 AM

The last time this team had a high 2nd round pick, it was traded for Matt Cassel.

Maybe the team could trade Cassel to Tampa for Freeman? Throw in Quinn?

Keep the picks, no thanks for trading them away again.

jd1020 01-07-2013 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9291376)
Freeman's contract status is NOT an opinion.

It expires after 2013, not 2012. He won't be a FA this offseason. People need to stop acting like he's an option this off-season. He won't be.

A lot of people aren't talking about him in trade manner. You don't 'bring him in for a look' when you trade for a guy. That's FA talk.

:facepalm:

The only thing not an opinion in this article is the leak that the Buccs aren't going to extend Freeman.

No one has said "bring him in for a look" until you just said it right there.

"Reading is fundamental."

007 01-07-2013 09:30 AM

There is no way you guys can get Freeman this year without giving up a pick or picks. The Chiefs cannot afford to throw away any picks right now.

Easy 6 01-07-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9291365)
I suggest a good number of you read the goddamn article to avoid confusion.

The bucs aren't releasing him. He won't be a FA this off-season.

They're going to make him play out his contract. After seeing what he does next season they'll make a decision to re sign him, let him walk, or franchise him. They're just not extending him NOW.

Reading is fundamental folks.

LMAO i'm at work, not always a lot of time to read through everything.

As for me, just giving an instant thought on the guy.

Rausch 01-07-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9291298)
I'd like Freeman if he were a FA.

2 firsts? LMAO

I wouldn't trade for him at all.

Period.

As a FA I'd consider bringing him in just like we did Brady (bye.)

Reerun_KC 01-07-2013 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9291232)
The most important thing is, he doesnt appear to much of a winner.

Then this is exactly what Chiefs fans want under center...

-King- 01-07-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 9291350)
I'd take this guy in a HEARTBEAT, he's EXACTLY the kind of big, physical pocket passer i prefer.

Guys like that arent nearly as afraid to step into pressure, they can make throws with guys hanging all over them and are much harder to sack... give him intense coaching and guidance and look out.

I would LOVE it, take a young hotshot #1 and let'em fight it out.

Have you ever seen him play ?
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 01-07-2013 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9291448)
Have you ever seen him play ?
Posted via Mobile Device

Anyone OTHER than KC?...

DaKCMan AP 01-07-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9291208)
Hmmm..maybe he's a trade option for KC. Sign me up for a 2nd rounder

:spock:

Easy 6 01-07-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9291448)
Have you ever seen him play ?
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes, he's very inconsistent, but i'd bet that with a top QB man in his ear every day he could fix that.

He isnt available anyway, oh well, still excited for the future.

crazycoffey 01-07-2013 09:52 AM

after he's cut, if reid thinks he has potential, ok.

petegz28 01-07-2013 09:55 AM

I'd give a low 2nd and a pack of hubba-bubba

Chiefshrink 01-07-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9291244)
In a QB-driven league, when a team doesn't extend a 24 year old QB who was drafted in the first round, you've got to wonder if it's buyer beware.

Yep. And who trusts that he doesn't turn into a drama queen because he can't beat the QBOTF out of a starting position as a 24 yr old as he sits on the bench in HIS HOMETOWN ?

Dante84 01-07-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 9291492)
Yep. And who trusts that he doesn't turn into a drama queen because he can't beat the QBOTF out of a starting position as a 24 yr old as he sits on the bench in HIS HOMETOWN ?

He's never been a drama queen.

crazycoffey 01-07-2013 10:04 AM

casshole and stanzi trade for freeman, do it walrus!

jd1020 01-07-2013 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barney Stinson (Post 9291510)
casshole and stanzi trade for freeman, do it walrus!

That's about the only trade I would do for Freeman... trash for trash.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.