Marcel Dareus Sports Science Video
 

I wish new how to embed this. Bugers me it worked!

<object width="384" height="216" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="ESPN_VIDEO" data="http://espn.go.com/videohub/player/embed.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowNetworking="all"><param name="movie" value="http://espn.go.com/videohub/player/embed.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="wmode" value="opaque"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"/><param name="flashVars" value="id=6402899"/></object>

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=6402899

PhilFree:arrow:

Quicker than Woodley and stronger than Suh.:hump:

To the aids tree forest with you:banghead:

I hope you guys draft Cam Newton.


PhilFree:arrow:

And production that doesn't come close to either.

He did play in a 3-4 though. You generally don't see big numbers from 3-4 defensive lineman. If he was utilized the way Fairley was I think he would have more production.

Yes, he would also have to learn a new position. Thanks for pointing that out.

Dareus is a really good player. I'm not pleased at all that he's going to Denver.

yeah, that's not awesome. (that he's going to Denver).

Hopefully they all run and get ice cream during training camp again, thus ensuring another stellar year of conditioning and injury prevention.

Just like all the other players that weren't regarded as highly while they were actually playing football, and shot up the draft boards due to combine performances? I doubt it actually matters though, because I don't think Denver is picking him.

If you watched SEC football, particularly Bama games, Dareus was very highly regarded.

I still think he goes 1 overall to the panthers.

Do you even watch football? Dareus was always a top 10 pick.

Sure, but #1 or 2? When football ended, who was ranked higher, Dareus or Fairley?

This--------Will knowmo slit his wrists. LMAO

Which would be a better meltdown, the Panthers taking him, or the Broncos passing on him if he's there?