ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft "Not "Worth" The #1 Pick??? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268148)

Vegas_Dave 12-29-2012 04:55 PM

"Not "Worth" The #1 Pick???
 
I have heard soooo many columnists and "experts" comment about the fact that there really isnt a QB "worth" the #1 pick.

What a bunch of horse crap. In the old CBA, when you had to pay the #1 pick $60-$70 million, I could understand this arguement and could agree with that. But in today's CBA, you dont dish that much out.

Andrew Luck's contract was for $22.1 million over 4 years. Yes, they had to pay $14.5 million in a signing bonus but so what?! In 2010, the Rams paid Sam Bradford a 6 year, $78 Million dollar contract with $50 Million GUARANTEED! Thats $13 million PER YEAR vs. Luck's $5.525 Million per year.

So even if Smith or whomever isnt the true Best Player available, I really dont think that in a situation like ours, where QB is such an obvious position of need, that $22 million for the #1 pick is really as big of a "reach" as we are led to believe by the experts.

To give you a comparison to Luck's #1 pick contract from 2012 at $22M, in 2010, this would be equivalent to the contract given to the #12 pick in the 2010 draft, Ryan Matthews in SD for $25.65M over 5 years.

Heck, I say draft a QB in Rounds 1, 2 & 3! Give us some frikken QB competition!

Rant end.

bevischief 12-29-2012 04:57 PM

Chocolate

Deberg_1990 12-29-2012 04:58 PM

Alex Smith

htismaqe 12-29-2012 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9249359)
Alex Smith

Banned.

Bob Dole 12-29-2012 05:02 PM

If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

sedated 12-29-2012 05:04 PM

I saw one draft that said Geno Smith isnt worth #1, but then had him going at #6 saying "you cant pass up value like that at #6". Is 6 to 1 that much of a "reach"?

They are just finding things to say at this point. Its four months away for christs sake.

Vegas_Dave 12-29-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9249359)
Alex Smith

This only further goes in line with my argument. As the #1 pick in his draft (2005), Smith received a 6 year, $49.5 million dollar contract with $24 million guaranteed.

If we draft Geno Smith at #1, he wouldn't get a contract even close to that.

Vegas_Dave 12-29-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

I agree... but if you can't, then I have absolutely no issues with them taking him as a "reach" at #1.

KevB 12-29-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

But who's going to give up picks to get to #1 this year? There isn't a dominant player that teams can't do without. Just a bad year to have the top pick both from a pick yourself and a trade the pick standpoint.

BigRedChief 12-29-2012 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

Because they will **** it up. Determine the best QB available and take him. **** draft value.

Reaper16 12-29-2012 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

Understandable point, but why would any team trade up? What player in this draft is worth trading up to #1 for?

htismaqe 12-29-2012 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 9249397)
I saw one draft that said Geno Smith isnt worth #1, but then had him going at #6 saying "you cant pass up value like that at #6". Is 6 to 1 that much of a "reach"?

They are just finding things to say at this point. Its four months away for christs sake.

He's not worth #1 but he is "VALUE" at #6?

ROFL ROFL

Bob Dole 12-29-2012 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 9249410)
Understandable point, but why would any team trade up? What player in this draft is worth trading up to #1 for?

Detroit move up to take the best DE/OLB?

Reaper16 12-29-2012 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249443)
Detroit move up to take the best DE/OLB?

Its possible. There is almost a certitude that one of either Moore, Jones, or Werner will be there when the Lions pick. But if they really, really, really loved one of those guys in particular then they might offer the Chiefs some picks.

It'd be a little like the Chiefs trading up from 5 to 1 to draft Eric Berry though.

Rasputin 12-29-2012 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9249359)
Alex Smith

NEG Rep & I no curr if your joking

Sofa King 12-29-2012 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 9249397)
I saw one draft that said Geno Smith isnt worth #1, but then had him going at #6 saying "you cant pass up value like that at #6". Is 6 to 1 that much of a "reach"?

They are just finding things to say at this point. Its four months away for christs sake.

This

htismaqe 12-29-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249443)
Detroit move up to take the best DE/OLB?

They'd have to have a big hard-on for Moore. Otherwise they wouldn't need to trade in front of Jax.

MahiMike 12-29-2012 05:49 PM

There is no such thing as a reach. Either a guy plays for your team the next 10 years or he doesn't. It's irrelevant where he was picked.

CoMoChief 12-29-2012 05:53 PM

trade Hali and Charles for Cousins straight up.


































snickering......:evil:

CoMoChief 12-29-2012 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 9249629)
There is no such thing as a reach. Either a guy plays for your team the next 10 years or he doesn't. It's irrelevant where he was picked.

ok Pioli......thanks for the Tyson Jackson pick!

BlackHelicopters 12-29-2012 05:57 PM

It is not my money. Draft Chocolate Thunder #1.

Thig Lyfe 12-29-2012 06:10 PM

I want to draft Bjoern Werner purely because of his accent.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4883512

Red Dawg 12-29-2012 06:39 PM

Players are a crap shoot. Qb is the biggest of all. Geno , tyler, barkley, bennon. All of them could be great or flop. I hope the chiefs evaluate them all to death and take the best prospect.

AdumbGuy 12-29-2012 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 9249795)
Players are a crap shoot. Qb is the biggest of all. Geno , tyler, barkley, bennon. All of them could be great or flop. I hope the chiefs evaluate them all to death and take the best prospect.

We can't take that chance. We should settle for a Geno Smith that's still alive.

Sorter 12-29-2012 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 9249713)
I want to draft Bjoern Werner purely because of his accent.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4883512

I posted this an another thread but we should leak that he is a Nazi/weed smoker/something bad so we can draft him in the 2nd.

splatbass 12-29-2012 06:47 PM

I hope they take him with #1, and agree that we shouldn't worry about "value". But, I'm not sure many NFL front offices agree. It seems like from what I've seen most still think value is important.

Will we have a GM come April that is willing to "reach" for Geno Smith? I don't know, but I won't get my hopes up.

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas_Dave (Post 9249325)
I have heard soooo many columnists and "experts" comment about the fact that there really isnt a QB "worth" the #1 pick.

What a bunch of horse crap. In the old CBA, when you had to pay the #1 pick $60-$70 million, I could understand this arguement and could agree with that. But in today's CBA, you dont dish that much out.

Andrew Luck's contract was for $22.1 million over 4 years. Yes, they had to pay $14.5 million in a signing bonus but so what?! In 2010, the Rams paid Sam Bradford a 6 year, $78 Million dollar contract with $50 Million GUARANTEED! Thats $13 million PER YEAR vs. Luck's $5.525 Million per year.

So even if Smith or whomever isnt the true Best Player available, I really dont think that in a situation like ours, where QB is such an obvious position of need, that $22 million for the #1 pick is really as big of a "reach" as we are led to believe by the experts.

To give you a comparison to Luck's #1 pick contract from 2012 at $22M, in 2010, this would be equivalent to the contract given to the #12 pick in the 2010 draft, Ryan Matthews in SD for $25.65M over 5 years.

Heck, I say draft a QB in Rounds 1, 2 & 3! Give us some frikken QB competition!

Rant end.

it's a crappy year to have the #1 pick.

mnchiefsguy 12-29-2012 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9249406)
Because they will **** it up. Determine the best QB available and take him. **** draft value.

Have to agree here. This pick is too important. Figure out who your guy is and take him. **** Kiper and McShay and their talk of draft value. Can you imagine how bad a franchise would be ran if you just made choices based on draft value?

BigRedChief 12-29-2012 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249819)
it's a crappy year to have the #1 pick.

so? We shouldn't pick a QB in the 1st round?

mnchiefsguy 12-29-2012 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249819)
it's a crappy year to have the #1 pick.

Bullshit. It is a normal year. Just because last year was exceptional at the QB position does not mean there is not a qb out there who can win for this franchise. Should we be pissed that the Chiefs did not make a move when their were not one, but two outstanding choices out there for qb? Hell yes. But saying that this years crop is complete garbage is a stupid statement as well. There is plenty of talent in this draft.

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 9249832)
Bullshit. It is a normal year. Just because last year was exceptional at the QB position does not mean there is not a qb out there who can win for this franchise. Should we be pissed that the Chiefs did not make a move when their were not one, but two outstanding choices out there for qb? Hell yes. But saying that this years crop is complete garbage is a stupid statement as well. There is plenty of talent in this draft.

it's a subpar year for the QB position, kc needs a QB and the question is whether or not a player like Geno is worth the #1 pick. Obviously Andrew Luck was, not so much with any of this year's QBs.

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9249827)
so? We shouldn't pick a QB in the 1st round?

KC has to draft a QB, there's no getting around that. The question is should the #1 pick be Geno or another one of this draft classes QBs? Maybe kc can trade down, pick up a few more picks and still get a good QB? Just say'n.

Demonpenz 12-29-2012 07:00 PM

If I was a lion GM I would draft Geno. Sit him behind Fat face mcgee

Chiefs=Champions 12-29-2012 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249842)
it's a subpar year for the QB position, kc needs a QB and the question is whether or not a player like Geno is worth the #1 pick. Obviously Andrew Luck was, not so much with any of this year's QBs.

Your football knowledge is obviously subpar..

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249819)
it's a crappy year to have the #1 pick.

You are dumb even for a donkey

DeezNutz 12-29-2012 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

Too risky.

If there's a single QB whom you're targeting, you cannot chance not getting him.

Thig Lyfe 12-29-2012 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249852)
KC has to draft a QB, there's no getting around that. The question is should the #1 pick be Geno or another one of this draft classes QBs? Maybe kc can trade down, pick up a few more picks and still get a good QB? Just say'n.

get the **** out

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 07:05 PM

lol, ok losers.

NJChiefsFan 12-29-2012 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249873)
lol, ok losers.

You just make sure of this tomorrow. No more losing to us in Denver to end the season. Although that usually only happens in "win and your in" games.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:11 PM

If anyone can shit their pants in a season finale...it's Denver. I'm not worried this time though.

VONDIPSHIT 12-29-2012 07:11 PM

I hope you guys draft Geno Smith. He has Jamarcus Russell written all over him.

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9249878)
You just make sure of this tomorrow. No more losing to us in Denver to end the season. Although that usually only happens in "win and your in" games.

so you are wanting to win this game tomorrow? :)

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:12 PM

Knowmo, you little bastard. Banhammer.

CaliforniaChief 12-29-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDOOM (Post 9249888)
I hope you guys draft Geno Smith. He has Jamarcus Russell written all over him.

ROFL

Why am I feeding the troll? Oh well.

Jamarcus Russell and Geno Smith have 1 thing in common: the color of their skin. Other than that, nice try.

NJChiefsFan 12-29-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249891)
so you are wanting to win this game tomorrow? :)

Of course not. Just saying you need to make sure you do what you are supposed to. Let us worry about the normal draft class that exists this year and every other when Luck isn't involved.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9249897)
ROFL

Why am I feeding the troll? Oh well.

Jamarcus Russell and Geno Smith have 1 thing in common: the color of their skin. Other than that, nice try.

It's the same goober that compared him to Leftwich. Mults are a no-no.

Crush 12-29-2012 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDOOM (Post 9249888)
I hope you guys draft Geno Smith. He has Jamarcus Russell written all over him.

Go **** yourself Knowmo.

OnTheWarpath15 12-29-2012 07:17 PM

It's not Knowmo, it's that Raiders troll Autumn Wind, AKA October Fart.

VONDIPSHIT 12-29-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9249897)
ROFL

Why am I feeding the troll? Oh well.

Jamarcus Russell and Geno Smith have 1 thing in common: the color of their skin. Other than that, nice try.

I can only hope that the chiefs draft him. He would be a great target for Miller and Dumervil next year.

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9249898)
Of course not. Just saying you need to make sure you do what you are supposed to. Let us worry about the normal draft class that exists this year and every other when Luck isn't involved.

fair enough.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:18 PM

So, Fart made a mult impersonating Knowmo to bash the Chiefs...Clever girl

OnTheWarpath15 12-29-2012 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9249919)
So, Fart made a mult impersonating Knowmo to bash the Chiefs...Clever girl

What a miserable existence one must lead to be a Raiders fan and create a Broncos fan mult to troll a message board.

Chiefs=Champions 12-29-2012 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249873)
lol, ok losers.

Losing our way to the number one overall pick! don't **** this up for us ok!?

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9249929)
What a miserable existence one must lead to be a Raiders fan and create a Broncos fan mult to troll a message board.

ROFL That's our Fart

Chiefs=Champions 12-29-2012 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDOOM (Post 9249914)
I can only hope that the chiefs draft him. He would be a great target for Miller and Dumervil next year.

Pryor going to complete a pass tomorrow?

Tombstone RJ 12-29-2012 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good (Post 9249934)
Losing our way to the number one overall pick! don't **** this up for us ok!?

ok

Pasta Little Brioni 12-29-2012 07:49 PM

Too bad for Miami in 08 that there was no QB worth the number one pick available. I bet they are sooo thrilled they didn't "reach" on Matt Ryan.

CoMoChief 12-29-2012 07:54 PM

It's not a bad year for the #1 pick?

That's a pretty dumb thing to say. I doubt there are many teams out there who'd be willing to trade for our #1 pick. It's going to be hard to trade down this season, if that's in their (Chiefs) plans. Personally I think it's going to be a 2009ish type of first round.

Personally I hope Geno tears it up at the combine and ends up being the guy we draft. I didn't like what I saw in today's bowl game. Partially due to the horrible game plan, that coaching staff should all be fired for the way they coached the game. It was bad conditions out but that's not an excuse. It can get really shitty in KC in late November and December. His throws weren't very spot on, and most of them were short throws.

Geno was kicking ass at the beginning of the season...but then kinda tailed off a little at the halfway point. WVU's defense was absolutely terrible this season. So that didn't help him in terms of wins/losses. Either way Geno's better than anything we have now at this point..but is it worth the #1 pick? I guess that depends if we get a good X's and O's coach that can make this offense score some points instead of the stooges we currently have now.

RINGLEADER 12-29-2012 09:37 PM

Was Russell Wilson worth a #1 pick? How about Tom Brady?

None of the people claiming to know what a player is worth before he's played in the NFL know what they're talking about.

CoMoChief 12-29-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 9250312)
Was Russell Wilson worth a #1 pick? How about Tom Brady?

None of the people claiming to know what a player is worth before he's played in the NFL know what they're talking about.

Well here's what we all do know....if the Chiefs DON'T take a QB w/ the first overall pick....people will be marching to Arrowhead w/ pitchforks.

Psyko Tek 12-29-2012 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 9249383)
If you could trade the #1 pick for multiple picks and still get your QB, what's the harm?

who is worth the number one pick senator and who wants to trade for it?

Fat Elvis 12-29-2012 09:48 PM

We paid $63M for Cassel; he's worth it.

Psyko Tek 12-29-2012 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 9249713)
I want to draft Bjoern Werner purely because of his accent.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4883512

just hearng holthis saying BeJorn

Psyko Tek 12-29-2012 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9249852)
KC has to draft a QB, there's no getting around that. The question is should the #1 pick be Geno or another one of this draft classes QBs? Maybe kc can trade down, pick up a few more picks and still get a good QB? Just say'n.

you know if they don't they will be drafting about the same next year with much less core players

jspchief 12-29-2012 10:04 PM

With the new rookie salary scale, money doesn't even enter the discussion.

I've said this in other threads. The only way you can say a QB isn't worth the #1 pick this year is if there is someone who is. So if not a QB, who?

Even if you want to claim that no one is worth the #1 pick, someone is still going to be chosen first overall. What's the difference betwween taking a QB 5 picks early, and taking a LT or LB 5 picks early? Expectations?

KC needs a QB. It's not like they can bring in a decent vet for significantly cheaper.

Ace Gunner 12-29-2012 10:08 PM

Draft a QB #1 and call me in the morning

L.A. Chieffan 12-29-2012 10:15 PM

If a guy sucks, he's not "worth" the #1 pick

htismaqe 12-29-2012 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 9250312)
Was Russell Wilson worth a #1 pick? How about Tom Brady?

None of the people claiming to know what a player is worth before he's played in the NFL know what they're talking about.

So you just throw darts at the board during the draft then?

That's a pretty ridiculous statement.

htismaqe 12-29-2012 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 9250408)
If a guy sucks, he's not "worth" the #1 pick

But he's worth the 6th if you can trade down, amirite?

Chiefnj2 12-29-2012 10:36 PM

Naming a specific QB at this point is premature. They need a housecleaning first and then hire the right GM/HC. Then worry about getting the QB that fits the vision of the HC.

Luck, Griffin, Wilson, Tannehill, it wouldn't have mattered in KC this year with Romeo and Daboll.

htismaqe 12-29-2012 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9250472)
Naming a specific QB at this point is premature. They need a housecleaning first and then hire the right GM/HC. Then worry about getting the QB that fits the vision of the HC.

Luck, Griffin, Wilson, Tannehill, it wouldn't have mattered in KC this year with Romeo and Daboll.

I agree with this. Especially if they bring in a guy with a specific offensive system.

morphius 12-29-2012 10:43 PM

sometimes you just have to draft for need, and when you have 1 QB on the roster who was deemed not good enough to replace 2 guys that are not very good... Really, you figure out which QB you think is best, and draft him. No messing around.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.