shaneo69 |
04-19-2005 06:56 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by beer bacon
Did I say anything about Surtain assuring us of a Super Bowl? I seem to remember posting "a real chance at a Super Bowl"." Did I post something else? I don't think I did. If you could address my post instead of just making up an argument our conversation might be more constructive.
Did I say anything about not needing more LBs? I have been advocate of signing/drafting more LBs this whole off season.
I don't really see what any of this has to do with our discussion. I think it is pretty evident that Surtain gives us much better chance of making it to the Super Bowl then a 2nd round pick does. I also don't see how you can possibly argue against this. Maybe if we had a history of getting very good players out of the 2nd round, but our history tells us the opposite. We consistantly draft busts in the second round.
If I have the choice between getting an ice cream cone or getting kicked in the nuts, with a very slight chance, lets say a 1/8th chance, or two times in sixteen years, of getting some ice cream that is worse then the former ice cream cone, but still tasty, then I should choose the former. It is not that difficult of a decision.
|
I didn't realize that I had your picture in my avatar.
1st paragraph: I think C. Rogers gives us as good of a chance as Surtain to get to the Super Bowl. We have a lot of other holes to fill though. Hopefully that addresses your post adequately.
2nd paragraph: You have been an advocate of signing/drafting more LB's this whole offseason? Yeah, no sh*t. Most everyone here wanted Hartwell, but we didn't sign him. Life goes on. So now what? Just because you wanted to sign FA LB's doesn't solve the problem. You want to draft a LB at #15? Who? My question stands since you didn't answer it.....how are we going to fill the gaping hole at LB after we trade for Surtain?
3rd paragraph: I don't care about our 2nd round drafting history. This is a new year. We could get Michael Boley or Barret Ruud in the 2nd round this year after taking Rogers in the 1st round. I'd rather have Rogers and Boley than Surtain('s contract) and whatever 1st rounder you'd realistically be able to get.
4th paragraph: You see trading our 2nd rounder for Surtain as a slam dunk easy decision. I see a $10-$12 mil signing bonus and a 2nd rounder for a guy with no upside and degenerative knees. Like I said before.....it's a philosophical difference.
You're the one who made a sarcastic response to my original post. If you think Rogers and Boley would lead to a pointless season, I'm fine with that. I was just giving my opinion. Like my post said, "If I was the Chiefs...."
|