Quote:
|
$10/mo extra for 14 channels of the best damn picture I've ever seen. I sure took it in the a** on that one.
|
Quote:
That's like my grandma asking my why I needed power locks and windows on my vehicle. They're just a rip-off! Then again, I guess I could just use a $15 black and white TV and save a FORTUNE vs. my 61" 16x9 widescreen. Hell, it came with a DirecTV HDTV tuner built-in for about $5000. Guess that extra $4985 just got me screwed huh? |
Quote:
Skip, That's pretty harsh. IF they are unpopular, it because they still cost $299 for NEW customers. See here. Add a $1000 for the HDDVR via Directv and you have an expensive setup. Now, lets talk cable. HD Cost Hardware cost - Nada. HD DVR cost - $10 per month. Now, in some areas (not sure about AR, when I was stationed there they did even HAVE tv ROFL ) the little dishes are a much better option for HDTV. But, in the Kanas City area, it's hard to beat TWC, which is what this tread's topic is about in the firstplace. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sounds like you're the one getting screwed here. |
This came from directv's website.
--- ENJOY AN INCREDIBLE HOME THEATER EXPERIENCE You'll see the puck, the sweat, even the seams on the curveball. You'll be moved again by your favorite movies with details you've never seen before. You'll go from ordinary to extraordinary in over two million pixels: Enjoy 10 times the pixels of ordinary TV - clear pictures, vibrant colors and wider images. -- Wow, 10 times. Sure seems like more than "a little better picture". Skip, don't you have some kind of business relationship with the guys that run that website, and make that statment? Source |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To me, it's like the difference between buying a Yugo and a Chevy (notice I didn't even go Caddy here). If you want to drive around in a piece of crap because it saves you money, fine. I myself work hard, and will treat myself to some of the luxuries in life. Since I was buying a big screen anyway, and 16x9 was an important feature for me, going HD was a minminal upgrade cost. It didn't cost me anywhere near $3000. The non-HD systems I was looking at were all about $4500 WITHOUT a built-in DTV tuner. |
Quote:
Besides, HD was crowned the format of the future. If you are buying non-HD now, you should EXPECT to have to replace it. Whether you do that now, or 5 years from now, that's your choice. The truth is that you WILL. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can actually understand this stance. $700, $1000, or $10,000 grand means different things to different people. If you have a fairly new TV, and you don't have any desire to replace it, I wouldn't try to talk you into it. I'm sure you spend money in areas that would have no appeal to me. Myself, I love tech stuff. Always have. This pc I'm typing on is a 925x chipset. Too new to be cost effective? You bet. Expensive? You bet. Will I replace it the first time something better comes along? You bet. My Home Theater has a dedicated room, and close to 10 grand in electronics. I watch it once a week or so during the off season (twins, don't forget). Much more during the season. Money, I can understand, this is totally different than coming in and arguing the tech specs of HDTV (picture quality) which is not a smart battle to pick. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.