Yeah, I don't want this to sound like I'm a big Romo homer or something. I don't disagree with anything Dane says about him. At all. But at the same time I'm guessing they'd have at worst 4 or 5 wins with him behind center, if not the same 6. And I have a suspicion that while they might have more turnovers (and hence risk giving up a few more points) they might also be scoring more.

I'm not as sold on "clutch" Alex Smith, because I tend to think the plays he's not making the rest of the game balance out the handful he's made at the end (or think about that the other way around, it sounds less negative that way). A statement that I contend applies to the offense as a whole. I think great for half a quarter, even if it's the fourth, paired with awful for 3.5 quarters makes for an overall "ugh".

Go **** your mother, you ****ing sack of shit.


LMAO

So, when Bill Parcells plucked him as an undrafted free agent, coached him up with Sean Payton for two years and unleashed him in his first starting season, Dallas has been flawed?

LMAO

Who's fault was it against Seattle that the snap was bobbled, sending them home?

LMAO

More ****ing, stupid, asinine bullshit.

Are we to believe that when the Cowboys went 13-3, mainly on the backs of Wade Phillips defense, that the Cowboys weren't Super Bowl contenders?

LMAO LMAO LMAO


What are his flaws? Why do the Cowboys continually shit the bed? Care to explain?

No one but you is comparing him to Alex Smith.

Butt****.

If he was what you say he is, how is it possible that he's been the best 4th quarter QB in the NFL since he entered the league? Wouldn't this choking bear itself out statistically?

I didn't miss anything. The Cowboys won their first playoff game over the Eagles at home (in which Romo played a great game) that season before losing to a superior Vikings team on the road. There was nothing surprising about it, nor should that season be any kind of indictment against Romo. Dallas accomplished what they should have and Romo himself did more than fine, especially when you consider it was his first full season as a starter.

Go **** yourself.

But in all honestly, I'm guessing you can't even do that.

WHO GIVES A ****?

The guy hasn't won SHIT.

Get back to us when he actually WINS SOMETHING.

It sure does seem that Romo comes up small in crucial moments, but damn if I wouldn't trade Alex Smith for him in a ****ing second.

First full season?

How many ****ing chromosomes are you missing?

He'd been a starter since 2004. They beat the Eagles in 2009.

You don't even know what the **** you're talking about.

Fantasy Football strikes again!

Well, why don't the packers, and Cowboys go get a defense like the Chiefs.

I mean, you make it sound so easy. Just GO DO IT.

The fact is, it isn't that easy. Also, trying to TRACK meet with the BRONCOS, I stated a long time ago was a STUPID IDEA. You saw how that worked out for the Cowboys. yet you saw when the Jags slowed them down, how even though they are pathetically weak talent wise, they were able to go out physical them for most of the game. That is how you are going to beat the Broncos. Trying to outscore them, isn't going to work.

But, per the usual, you completely missed the MARK.

Id take Romo in quarters 1-3 over Alex Smith.

No way in hell do I want Romo anywhere near my offense in a crucial situation in the 4th quarter though.

Not really. Alex Smith just ****ing sucks; it's not any more complicated than that.

:)

Alex Smith isn't Matt Cassel. He's not Geno Smith.

While he's certainly not putting up historic numbers, he's also not putting his team in bad situations, nor is he turning the ball over at crucial times.

You need to get over it, Dude. Alex Smith is who he is and he's not going anywhere.

Well, you're right that I probably need to get over it, but then I watch him play on Sundays and have renewed anger.

I completely disagree that he's not putting the team in bad situations, and last Sunday was a perfect illustration of this. The game was in doubt as long as it was, in large part, because Smith was garbage.

Yeah, the line play needs to be better (and it damn well should be better), but Smith gets more blame because more is (rightfully) expected of him.

Fisher is a very close second. Anyway, both are going to be in KC for the next 3-4 years for sure.

Amazing level of ignorance and so consistently from you on this board. It truly is.


Yes, Dallas has been flawed over the last 7 seasons. They've never been a legit SB contender and that has very little to do with anything Tony Romo has done with them (which, on the whole, has been very good).

A bobbled snap has nothing to do with Romo's QB ability, not that Dallas would have likely advanced any further than that considering they were a 9-7 team lucky to even be in the playoffs (due largely to the offense being the 4th most productive in the league, I should add).

Dallas scored the 2nd most points in the league that season. Their defense allowed the 13th most. But yeah, that was all "on the backs of Wade Phillips' defense." Romo ****ing carried that team.

Like Favre, Romo has a tendency to go for the big play and can often make mistakes because of it. But no more often than many other QBs in the league (including those often held up to be some of the greatest of all time).

Over the last 4 seasons, it's mostly because they haven't been a particularly good team. Before that, it was mostly because teams were better than them and beat them in a home game.


Try reading the thread again, dipshit. I actually specifically addressed a post that was comparing Romo and Smith.

Clown.