yes this. Really just depends on where Bray's development is at this point. Should be more clear by September, eh?

Wilson and Tannehill.

Your level of knowledge exceeds my expectations for someone that thinks Foles was ever going to be a 1st round pick. Bravo, sir!

I'd go back in time and never bother signing Daniel in the first place.

From this list, though, I'd definitely cut Peyton Manning. Now THAT would help the Chiefs win a couple more games.

I like Murray as a 3rd round talent, but I tend to somewhat agree here. Not that it sucks to have him on the roster... just that imho KC would have been better served in using that pick elsewhere this draft.

Late first rounder in a weak draft class like '13. Why the **** not?

You just said the QB class was strong...

I said if he came out in a weak draft class

2 QBs don't make a QB drop to the ****ing late 3rd round. Sorry.

Same can be said for Murray, in his case the 5th round... but okay lol.

What's your point?

That was never the argument.

If Bray is not a long term answer, I'd actually rather keep Daniel. He's a decent backup. If Bray could be a viable future starter or trade bait, keep him.

You asked me how I know rookie Murray is better than rookie Foles. I used draft value as an example. You then gave the excuse that Murray's value was tampered with due to a strong draft class.

The only problem is both of these guys were taken in strong draft classes... one just didn't fall to the 5th round is all.

Draft value doesnt mean shit. If it did Foles wouldn't have been drafted until the ****ing late 3rd. He would have been drafted right after Wilson, who would have been picked right after RG3.

There was nothing particularly strong about the 2012 QB class outside of Luck and RG3. Just like there was nothing strong about this QB class. The only difference is Murray tore his ACL.

Keep bray if smith goes down we throw deep allllll day