InChiefsHeaven |
12-13-2012 09:27 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
(Post 9204390)
I think there are less now, per capita, especially since things like that were swept under the rug back then.
|
I'm not going to look up the data, but you seriously think that the amount of teenage pregnancy and STD's and such was MORE back than than it is now? Since we're just talking opinions here, I have to respectfully disagree. yes, things were not talked about and pushed under the rug, but I'd say in an era of permissiveness and acceptance, it just stands to reason that this type of thing is much more prevalent now than back in the 50's.
Just my opinion.
|