ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Who would you rather have drafting for the Chiefs?

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Who would you rather have drafting for the Chiefs? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270140)

I don't think it would be hard to beat this...and this is only round 1

Spoiler!

We'd probably end up with a few decent players, but we'd severely overpay for every one of them.

Soren Petro talks about the draft and fans saying I'd be better than these guys, and after a player taken later, fans come out and say, I liked him, that was my guy, like Russell Wilson.

So he says, every year the day of the draft write down who you would take right before the Chiefs draft, for every pick, and keep a log of your actual picks, you'll be surprised that you won't just have great draft after great draft. Sometimes the Chiefs will do better than you, sometimes you might draft better, but it won't be as often as you'd think.

Yeah, we would be dealing with Mark Sanchez and Vernon Ghoulston instead of Tyson Jackson and Glenn Dorsey...

kinda fail all the way around imo....lol

In the "Alternate Reality" Chiefs game that Rainman set up four years ago, every planeteer that participated has so far done better than the real Chiefs. I expect that will continue.

damn straight.
Posted via Mobile Device

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9411988)

We'd probably end up with a few decent players, but we'd severely overpay for every one of them.

does it hurt your brain when you read curious george to start your day?
Posted via Mobile Device

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9412000)

Yeah, we would be dealing with Mark Sanchez and Vernon Ghoulston instead of Tyson Jackson and Glenn Dorsey...

kinda fail all the way around imo....lol

My record is only about 50/50 but that's much better than KC has done since 2001...

For those who voted to trust "The collective wisdom of ChiefsPlanet", the results of this poll suggest you too should rather have "Dorsey, Reid and Co." running the draft. So there's that. :)

Hhmmmmmm... two guys who get paid around 5 mil a piece per year and were each selected for only 32 available positions in the world vs guys who spend half their time watching youtube highlights and the other half in poop threads.

Very tough call, although there is the "Fat Scott" factor which does pose a serious challenge on how dumb an NFL big shot can be...but since we have two with equal power (basically, don't care what they told the media) I am definitely going with Andy Dorsey's opinion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9412134)

My record is only about 50/50 but that's much better than KC has done since 2001...

Yep.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 9412147)

For those who voted to trust "The collective wisdom of ChiefsPlanet", the results of this poll suggest you too should rather have "Dorsey, Reid and Co." running the draft. So there's that. :)

You're so much smarter than everybody else.

:clap:

Collective wisdom eh?

If Dorsey/Reid go QB at 1, I don't give a **** who they select with rounds 2-7, but I'll trust them on it.

If they don't go QB at 1, then I want a do-over, this time with Chiefs Planet making that pick. And then Dorsey/Reid can have the rest of the draft because again, I don't give a flying **** about 2-7

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9412001)

In the "Alternate Reality" Chiefs game that Rainman set up four years ago, every planeteer that participated has so far done better than the real Chiefs. I expect that will continue.

wht thread is that? I'l love to see it