There's no reason to have any interest whatever in Foles when Alex Smith is available.

I refuse to be trolled by this blockhead. Somebody take out the trash.

Exactly.

We could get a DL there, or an ILB, or a starting S, all of which are bigger needs than some "faux" competition at QB.

Geno Smith/Nick Foles is an either/or proposition.

Yeah, the Rams traded a high draft pick to give Sam Bradford competition, didn't they?

That's what the Panthers did with Cam, right?

And Detroit did that with Stafford too, right?

If we draft a QB, we're bringing in a vet, or keeping Matt Cassel.

If we're bringing in Foles, we won't be drafting a QB high. Foles will be the starter.

:Lin:

What's wrong with that statement? If we're going to acquire a veteran QB, there's no reason to start over with Foles. There's someone who has played better, has experience starting in the league, has won playoff games, etc.

No they didn't, and I'm not a fan of those situations either.

Reveal yourself. Ncarlscorner?

How about Joe Flacco then? Or Andy Dalton?

Or Matt Ryan?

When you draft a guy that high, you commit to him, like it or not.

Furthermore, when you make a decisive move for a QB (like trade a 2nd for Matt Cassel), you're committing to him too.

The Matt Flynn/Russell Wilson scenario in Seattle last year is like winning the lottery - it NEVER happens to you.

Are you all in for any QB, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon? Or is it Smith or bust for you?

Wilson, absolutely. Barkley, sure, I guess if that's who they decide is best.

Big NO on Glennon.

that high 3rd pick will beat out Jon Baldwin and Dexter McCluster on the depth chart so dont trade it

Funny.

And yet sad.

:D

and yet true!