Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And he'll be a free agent next year, then would you pay for him? |
Quote:
Here's another factor...under Crennel we played RCB/LCB and didn't move guys around to shadow top receivers while the Jets did. We get Revis, he gets the top guy and Flowers would almost always get the #2 WR. That's a big factor when you figure in the quality of our potential as a disruptive front 7. |
It also violates a pretty good de facto rule: Unless the guy is a QB, don't give him a third contract.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cassel for Revis! We'll even throw in Quinn! :titus:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It just isnt a good idea for this team, if we were a top corner away from contending it'd be a different story. |
Draft honey badger
Team him up with our puff puff pass rush Profit |
Quote:
|
I'm also assuming he's gonna stay in his prime until he's 32,33. Probably won't, but if that were the case, I'd be more inclined.
|
Cue my usual "Cornerbacks don't win titles" rant. I don't feel like typing it anymore.
In reality, they can help... but teams that shoot their wad on CB never win. Although I know I've enjoyed watching Brandon Carr in the playoffs the last couple weeks. |
Quote:
What are the odds he would not take KC's offer of the biggest contract if he were in New York, Dallas, or Tampa? He'll go where the money is, IMO. Therefore unless one year of Revis> 4-5 of a #65 pick and the surplus money from not paying for that year, you don't make the trade. I don't see how that equation points to us trading for him, unless for some reason the guy likes holding out for reasons other than money. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.